• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Ahmadinejad: Iran is a “Nuclear State”

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today used the annual celebration of the anniversary of Iran’s Islamic revolution to announce that Iran has become a “nuclear state.” Although the bombastic dictator has made this claim before, his exultant announcement came shortly after Iran had announced that it would enrich uranium to the 20 percent level that it claims it needs to fuel a research reactor that is scheduled to run out of fuel later this year.

    Ahmadinejad proclaimed: “I want to announce with a loud voice here that the first package of 20 percent fuel was produced and provided to the scientists.” In a speech broadcast live on state television he said: “We have the capability to enrich uranium more than 20 percent or 80 percent but we don’t enrich (to this level) because we don’t need it.” He told the crowd: “When we say we do not manufacture the bomb, we mean it, and we do not believe in manufacturing a bomb. If we wanted to manufacture a bomb, we would announce it.”

    Ahmadinejad spoke before a huge crowd in Tehran mobilized by the regime, in part by transporting loyalists in from outlying regions. The opposition Green Movement also staged counter-demonstrations despite the attacks and intimidating tactics used by Iran’s police, Revolutionary Guards, and Basij militia. Many opposition leaders were attacked by thugs when they tried to meet with protesters. Presidential candidate Mehdi Karrubi and former President Mohamed Khatami were physically beaten.

    Opposition sources charged that the police also fired tear gas and shots at an opposition rally led by Mir Hossein Mousavi, Ahmadinejad’s chief rival in the fraudulent presidential elections last June.

    Ahmadinejad yesterday also made a phone call to Syrian leader Bashar Assad in which he warned Israel against attacking Syria, Lebanon or elsewhere in the region. “If the Zionist regime should repeat its mistakes and initiate a military operation, then it must be resisted with full force to put an end to it once and for all.” Tensions have been rising along Israel’s border with Lebanon, which was the battlefield for a 34-day war between Israel and the Hezbollah terrorist group in 2006. Hezbollah has been supplied with thousands of Iranian-made rockets and other weapons and has regained its military muscle in southern Lebanon after losing many gunmen and much territory in 2006. Ahmadinejad’s phone call is a pointed signal to Israel that if it launches a preventive strike at Iran’s nuclear program, then Tehran will order Hezbollah to launch terrorist and rocket attacks against Israel.

    Iran’s provocative defiance of five U.N. Security Council resolutions and three sets of sanctions now puts additional pressure on the United States and other concerned countries to respond with much stronger sanctions. But China, which has opposed additional sanctions under the pretense that more sanctions would derail negotiations, is not likely to be cooperative.

    And Russia also has defended Iran’s interests at the Security Council and cannot be trusted to support effective sanctions against Iran.

    The United States is pushing for the strongest possible sanctions at the U.N. Security Council but the end result of these efforts will not approach the “crippling sanctions” that the Obama Administration has promised. Washington therefore must think outside the U.N. box and press its allies and other countries to impose stronger sanctions outside the U.N. framework. Iran would be hard hit by bans on foreign investment, gasoline exports, trade with firms affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other measures undertaken by the European Union, Japan, India, the Gulf Cooperation Council or other countries.

    But before it can ask other countries to impose stronger sanctions, the Obama Administration should support stronger U.S. sanctions which both houses of Congress have voted to approve.

    The Obama Administration also should take a lesson from Ronald Reagan and support Iran’s freedom-seeking opposition movement.

    Given the failure of the Obama Administration’s engagement policy to halt Iran’s nuclear efforts, Israel soon may be forced to take military action against Iran. For a look at the implications for the United States, see:
    An Israeli Preventive Attack on Iran’s Nuclear Sites: Implications for the United States.

    For more on U.S. Iran policy, see: Iran Briefing Room

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Ahmadinejad: Iran is a “Nuclear State”

    1. Randy,SA TX says:

      what happend to my post?

    2. Pingback: Michael J. Totten

    3. Pingback: Iran’s Natanz Nuclear Facility Suffers Growing Pains | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    4. Pingback: Has the Iranian Midget Overstated Iran’s Nuclear Capability? « Dancing Czars

    5. Tenn Slim Tennessee says:



      Iran, Nucs and Israel, a continuing saga of bluster.


      Eventually, someone, somewhere, will make a mistake. An errant missle, a gone wrong Spec Op, a Hit against a too prominent leader, and the fur will hit the fan. Eons ago, PBS did a similar scenario involving the USS KH. She is scrap now, so her feelings will not be hurt. Anyway, the KH was nuced, right after she launched her Alpha Strikes, and Iran was no more. Of Course, being PBS, the USA was entirely wrong in the scenario.

      Point is, the pot continues to simmer. Boiling points are easily reached. We are indeed fast approaching Megidio.


      Semper Fi

    6. Pingback: The President Must Stop Voting “Present” on Iran! « A Nation ADrift-Why?

    7. Dan, Detroit says:

      I want to pose a challenge to all readers of this comment. Go to http://mittromneycentral.com/resources/books-by-m… and listen to some of the clips from Mitt’s upcoming book. Once you have listened to a clip or two, then tell me how Mitt Romney wouldn’t be 100x better than Obama.

      As a side note, just wait to see how little media attention the left gives Mitt’s book compared to Sarah’s. Mitt’s entire book and even name is an attack on liberalism and progressism, but I’m willing to bed the lefties will try to sweep it under the rug because they don’t want people to hear what Mitt has to say. Mitt articulately and intelligently rips them to shreds and he scares them to death. The left’s best hope is for Mitt to lose the GOP nomination in 2012.

    8. Dennis, Netherlands says:

      This article reflects the ignornace of the author. Not even the CIA has called the elections fraudulent, but the result predictable. And calling Hezbollah a terrorist group is like calling the resistance in WO II who were fighting the Nazi's terrorists. By the way, why don't you mention that almost 50 million Iranians demonstrated in favour of the regime on the anniversary while the opposition could be found with difficulty, comprising of a few hundreds at most. Please spend a little less time watching CNN, BCC and especially Foxnews and look into more alternative sources like presstv

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.