• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Consensus for Marriage Vote in DC

    Last week the District of Columbia’s Board of Elections and Ethics (BOEE) rejected, for the third time, a request by five D.C. citizens to put the issue of same-sex marriage to a popular vote.

    If the Board’s decision is upheld by the D.C. Superior Court and appeals fail, only the U.S. Congress will be able to ensure that a vote occurs before the same-sex marriage law approved by the D.C. Council takes effect early next month. Advocates of the traditional definition of marriage, represented by the public interest law firm Alliance Defense Fund, immediately filed an appeal of the BOEE ruling last Friday, and they are seeking an expedited ruling on the public’s right to vote under the D.C. Charter.

    Now it appears that a solid majority of D.C. citizens, including a sizable number of supporters of same-sex marriage, favor allowing the people of the District of vote on the issue. In a poll conducted by The Washington Post published on Sunday, 59% of D.C. adults said that they favor allowing the people of the city to vote on the issue. This despite the fact that, according to the poll, 56% of D.C. residents favor same-sex marriage and only 35% are opposed. There is also a racial split among D.C. adults. Eighty-three percent of D.C.’s white residents favor same-sex marriage, while only 37% of black D.C. residents do. The poll had a sample size of 1,135 and a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.

    Adding to the pressure for a vote is new legislation introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and the U.S. Senate by Robert Bennett (R-UT), which would disallow implementation of the same-sex marriage law until the people of D.C. have had a change to vote on the measure. Thirty-one other U.S. jurisdictions have exercised that option and rejected same-sex marriage at the ballot box. Residents of the nation’s capital should enjoy that same option, regardless of the outcome on Election Day.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Consensus for Marriage Vote in DC

    1. Dan-Coalinga, CA says:

      I believe most people do not object to extending equal rights to 'gay' persons. I do object to changing the 3000 yr. old definition of "marriage". Changing the definition would allow a free-for-all on what, who or how many could "marry".

    2. Pingback: ADF Alliance Alert » Consensus for marriage vote in DC

    3. Lynn Bryant DeSpain says:

      Our Nation and its foundation was written by founders believing in judeo/christion beliefs or at least a Supreme Power overseeing us all. This included the natural order of all species and their propagation, meaning it takes a male and a female to produce offspring.

      Congress may consider a 'Team' one horse and one rabbit, but our Constituion does not.

    4. Sam, WI says:

      If same-sex marriage becomes legal, then why shouldn't plural marriage be legal?

    5. Gary, San Francisco says:

      Pluiral marriage will not follow, because it has historically been, and based on recent Mormon scandals, is still inherently abusive to women.

      Marriage equality for same sex couples harms no one.

    6. Bobbie Jay says:

      Gary, quit it! Who are you to take the example of the president and put words in the mouths and minds of people. Same sex marriage hurts those that know and live the true meaning of marriage now seeing it changed to include a class of people who's preferential sex is hypocritical to the true definition of the word.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.