• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Truth about Abstinence Education: What Obama and Pelosi Don’t Want You to Know

    Yesterday, a new study was released showing that abstinence education programs were effective in reducing teen sexual activity while conventional safe sex programs had no positive effects. Ironically, this finding comes at a time when President Obama and the Pelosi/Reid Congress have abolished all federal funding for abstinence and created a new funding stream to promote so-called “comprehensive” sex education. In order to understand this issue, it is important to dispel common myths about abstinence education and sex ed in general.

    Myth: Abstinence Programs Don’t Work. The newly released study (which appeared in the February 2010 Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, published by the American Medical Association) was far from the first demonstrating the effectiveness of abstinence education. Prior to the current study, there had been 15 scientific evaluations of abstinence education, 11 of which had shown that abstinence programs were effective in reducing sexual activity. (See this 2008 Heritage paper for a review of these earlier studies.) However, before this week, the mainstream media had simply ignored the abundant evidence in favor of abstinence.

    Myth: Under the Bush administration, the federal government funded only abstinence education. In fact, a funding analysis by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows that, in recent years, the federal government spent four dollars on condom education and distribution for teens for every dollar spent on abstinence. Obama and Pelosi have now abolished all federal funding for abstinence. The left wing advocates who currently run Congress do not want a balance between abstinence and safe sex; they want “safe sex” to be the only message available to young people.

    Myth: Comprehensive sex ed programs emphasize abstinence. Advocates for comprehensive sex ed contend that these programs stress abstinence as the first option and talk about contraceptives only as a fallback if students become sexually active. This is false. In the real world, “comprehensive” curricula barely mention abstinence, and, when they do, the treatment is often derisive. Abstinence is taught as a minor option for the hyper risk averse or for those who are simply too immature for the real rewards of teen sex. Teen sexual activity is trumpeted as the acceptable social norm. In reality, “comprehensive” sex ed programs are nothing more than old style “safe sex” programs hiding under a new label. Their message to teens is simple: hook up on Friday night but wear a condom. (See this paper on messages in comprehensive sex ed)

    Myth: Parents want “comprehensive” sex ed. In reality, 91 percent of parents want youth taught to abstain from sexual activity until they have at least finished high school. Nine out ten teens agree with this message. All abstinence programs support this message. By contrast, no “comprehensive” sex ed curricula teach this core value. Instead, “comprehensive” sex ed programs teach that it is okay for teens to be sexually active as long as they use contraceptives. Only nine percent of parents approve of this message. (See this poll on parent attitudes.)

    Myth: Abstinence education leaves youth ignorant about contraception. It is true that former federal abstinence programs taught only about abstinence—but that doesn’t mean teens were ignorant about contraception. A single focus on abstinence made sense since the programs had only a few hours in the classroom. Moreover, teens were unlikely to get a clear abstinence message elsewhere in society, certainly not in the popular media. But most young people who were taught abstinence in school were also taught factual information about contraception elsewhere in the school curricula, for example, in biology or health class.

    Myth: More condoms are the answer to teen and non-marital pregnancy. The left argues that lack of access and information about contraception is the main cause of teen and non-marital pregnancy. The answer to these problems is therefore more promotion of birth control. This is false. Contrary to conventional wisdom, lack of access to birth control is not a significant factor contributing to non-marital pregnancy among teens or non-teens.

    Harvard sociologist Kathryn Edin recently conducted a survey of lower income men and women who had experienced (or, in the case of men, caused) one or more non-marital pregnancies. The survey asked whether the individuals had ever in their lives been in a situation where they wanted to use birth control, but could not afford it or could not obtain it. All answered no.

    Many laughed at the suggestion that their pregnancies had been caused by a lack of access to contraceptives, pointing out that contraceptives are abundantly available and aggressively promoted by schools and clinics in their communities. Of all the non-marital pregnancies reported in the study, not one was caused by lack of availability of contraceptives.

    Teens Deserve Better. The current goal of the Obama administration is to kill abstinence education and to hype condoms in every school in the nation using programs that condone and encourage teen sex. This campaign is unacceptable to nearly all parents and will do nothing to solve real problems.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to The Truth about Abstinence Education: What Obama and Pelosi Don’t Want You to Know

    1. Ozzy6900 says:

      1. Condoms provide a barrier against sexually transmitted disese (most) and pregnancy (98%), abstinence provides 100% protection from both!

      2. Sex education is the job of PARENTS not the Government, States or Schools.

      3. Family values do more for teens than any Government Program ever could.

      Simply put, when teenage girls keep their legs closed and teenage boys keep it in their pants, there is little risk of problems!

    2. Amy, Fletcher OH says:

      If the law of God and the fear of God was still taught in schools and at home then there would be no discussions needed or money spent on programs such as these.

    3. Ron Derry NH says:

      The hall mark of civility is SELF control. Now it is possible to teach that as that is what general morality is, a social obediance to a standardized civility where you teach children to observe certain abilities within themselves that will keep them in a somewhat personally directed and more satisfying life. The liberals appear to see this as a threat to self independence and a challenge to government rule.

      The liberals have been teaching self destruction in the name of freedom and then using that chaos to alarm everyone to the need of government intervention to save the masses from themselves. After they have given the responsibility of growing up with out guidelines to their children, and they predictably fail and are put at risk, they then turn on anyone whose ideas are superior at intervening in the behalf of responsibility.

      It seem liberalism has become so disjointed that all it is left preaching is destruction of the ability to teach children responsibility first. We have watched liberals dismantle the tools of education, of learned responsibility of self and the removal of borders designed to protect the innocent all so they can create an atmosphere where the government is needed to clean up the ensuing mess. This is just more of how the government can use funding to attack people in the name of more government forced destruction of personal responsibility.

      You can't put the yoke of servitude on a free people until you dissolve their allegiance to self destiny and control. The desire to force government imposed liberal idealism that defies personal responsibility is mandated destruction of the foundation of independence which building blocks are personal responsibility , self control, and independent free will. That means independence from the government not from self responsibility.

      To accept that liberalism methodology has made American schools better would be to accept that failure is an achievement.

      Liberalism is the single best weapon to fleece the youth of a chance to enjoy a life of purpose and chosen independent will, and force them into a struggle for survival that a real education would give them the tools to void.

    4. Pingback: The Left’s Trouble With Abstinence | Caffeinated Thoughts

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×