Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Growing Momentum for Iran Sanctions in Congress, But Not So Much at the U.N.

Posted January 29th, 2010 at 6:00pm in American Leadership 1 Print This Post Print This Post

The Senate yesterday passed a bill that would impose new sanctions on Iran and on companies that assist Iran’s oil industry. The legislation, S.2799, targets companies that supply Iran with gasoline and other refined products or help it to expand its refinery capacity. Although Iran possesses the world’s third largest oil reserves, it must import approximately 40 percent of its gasoline supplies because of a lack of refinery capacity. The House voted to pass similar legislation last month by a vote of 412-12.

The Senate vote came the day after nine senators wrote a letter urging President Obama to take stronger action to escalate pressure on Iran over its suspect nuclear efforts. The letter, which urged the administration “to do everything that is necessary to stop Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability in the critical months ahead,” was signed by Republican Senators Jon Kyl, John McCain, Johnny Isakson, and David Vitter, independent Joe Lieberman, and Democratic Senators Evan Bayh, Robert Casey, Charles Schumer, and Benjamin Cardin.

Meanwhile, the Obama Administration’s efforts to ratchet up pressure on Iran in the United Nations Security Council faces resistance from the usual suspects: China and Russia. The Wall Street Journal reported that the administration will push for enhanced financial sanctions on Iran and measures aimed specifically at Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its huge constellation of enterprises and front companies.

China, which has a growing trade relationship with Iran, has been dragging its feet on another round of sanctions. It forced a cancellation of a meeting of the five permanent members of the Security Council on Iran in December and only sent a low-level delegation to a meeting on that issue two weeks ago. Russia also has sought to dilute and delay any sanctions at the Security Council. Yesterday Moscow signaled that this resistance is likely to continue: a top arms trade official issued a statement that reassured Iran that it is a valued market for Russian arms exports and noted that no international agreements bar Russia from selling weapons to Tehran.

This is one more sign that if and when the United Nations Security Council takes action, it is likely to be a day late and a dollar short.

For more on Iran, see: Iran Briefing Room

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “Growing Momentum for Iran Sanctions in Congress, But Not So Much at the U.N.”

  1. marym sc on at said:

    This is insanity. Do we not have enough problems in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan? We should be concentrating on our economy and mining our own energy sources. I hope that this snowstorm had Congress left D.C. empty and that they never return.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.