• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The President's Anemic Speech on the State of National Defense

    On foreign policy and national defense, President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address was anemic.

    It brushed over key issues like Iran and terrorism and skipped some important issues, like how best to handle detainees, entirely. There were, in fact, moments when the President’s rhetoric flew in the face of his actions, such as when he praised the very Iranian protestors whom had been ignored in the days after the Iranian election. Another example is that while he sounded supportive of free trade, what he said (e.g., his emphasis on export subsidies that will likely violate WTO rules and his non-reference to ratifying the free-trade agreements with Colombia and others) is actually quite protectionist in nature.

    The comments on Afghanistan were perfunctory at best, focusing on bringing U.S. troops home rather than prevailing. There were other times when the President tried to shift blame for things which he had been partly responsible himself, such as in lamenting the loss of national unity since 9/11 — a development in which he had played such a huge role during the campaign when attacking U.S. policy in Iraq.

    The President continued his ungracious habit of contrasting himself with the previous administration, such as when he claimed to have killed or captured more al-Qaeda “fighters” than in 2008, all the while taking credit for “ending the war” in Iraq without making the slightest attempt to credit President Bush’s policies for enabling that outcome.

    One of the more awkward moments was when President Obama tried to claim the legacy of Ronald Reagan in his campaign to rid the world of nuclear weapons. This is disingenuous at best coming from a President who cut back on Reagan’s dream of missile defense. President Reagan’s entire claim to “make nuclear weapons obsolete” was based on his Strategic Defense Initiative, or SDI — the idea of defending against missile attack. It was not based on the empty dream of eliminating all nuclear weapons by arms control treaties, as President Obama has envisioned.

    Finally, the speech had a couple of spurious claims that defy reality, such as when he pretended his policies have “strengthened our hand” in dealing with nations violating international proliferation agreements. If anything, North Korea and Iran have become more defiant on President Obama’s watch.  While there were a couple of attempts to reach out to his critics, they fell short on a commitment to action.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to The President's Anemic Speech on the State of National Defense

    1. Jacqueline Stemberga says:

      Since is so visible our high rate of unemployment which is unexcusable, why still so many retired people and rich, holding jobs on the expense of young that need work experience and need to provide for their families and send their children into Colleges and go about to their life.

      Would old government people leave finally their high paid position to young population? Let,s get back to old retirement policy. To go to retirement in 55 of age, and MUST go!

      President Obama, send them home!

    2. Fabien Benjamin says:

      Sorry Jacqueline I really don't understand why you make such a comment for those who worked for the Government, Being an enlisted man for 23 years and involved in two wars and leaving the service at 39 I still had a lot of me to give . At the time private sectors in my field descriminated against males . So I turned and the Military accepted me as a civil servant. Pay is not what you must think. the majority of employees are low payed. They are hard working. So watch what you say, give us the credit where its due, don't blame all for a few misfits,.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×