• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Cold Feet on Climate … and the EPA


    Yesterday, as if he knew the results of the Massachusetts Senate race, retiring Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) ruled out the possibility of the Senate considering a cap-and-trade bill. The reluctance of the Senate to take up a comprehensive global warming bill coincides with increasing public skepticism. Despite these obvious warning signs that global warming policies are quickly becoming a third rail in American politics, intelligent insiders suggest the President will continue to emphasize cap-and-trade and its job creation ability in his State of the Union Address next week.

    Of course, readers of the Foundry know that cap-and-trade does not create jobs – it destroys them. Heritage found that the House-passed cap-and-trade bill would result net job losses approaching 1.9 million in 2012 and 2.5 million by 2035.

    Why then is the President pushing an unpopular policy that doesn’t help the economy? Conventional wisdom suggests the threat of regulatory action will spur lawmakers to pass a cap-and-trade program of their own. That argument has failed to persuade even a majority of Senators to act.

    Now, the Senate is poised to begin a frontal assault on the Administration’s failing strategy. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) plans to introduce a Resolution of Disapproval, which is one of the only ways for elected officials to block regulations enacted by our unelected bureaucracy. The effort is widely considered a long shot because it must be passed by both chambers and signed by the President.

    However, it would be dangerous to dismiss the effort as Senators take notice of a changing public mood and the continued economic malaise. It is clear that cap-and-trade is a non-starter in the Senate. The question becomes why is repealing a regulation that costs job, increases the cost of energy and hurts small businesses a non-starter? In short, it may not be.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.