• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • President Obama’s Fictional Spending Cuts

    Last spring, President Obama proposed $11.3 billion worth of discretionary spending cuts. Today’s Washington Times notes that Congress accepted $6.9 billion worth of these cuts, a 61 percent success rate.

    In a $3.6 trillion federal budget, that comes to just 0.2 percent of the federal budget.

    But there is a larger issue:100 percent of the savings from these “cuts” were automatically shifted into new spending. Total federal spending was not reduced by one dollar.

    Here’s why: By the time President Obama released his proposed cuts, Congress and the White House already agreed on a top-line figure of $1,091 billion in discretionary spending. The only remaining issue was how to divvy up the funds. So Congress merely took $6.9 billion from the targeted programs, and shifted that money to other programs. At the end of the year, total discretionary spending remained at exactly $1,091 billion.

    Furthermore, nearly all of the spending cuts proposed by the president and accepted by Congress were in defense. Thus, all they did was shift billions of dollars from defense programs to domestic programs. It’s like an indebted family cutting its grocery budget, but then putting all the savings into entertainment.

    So how is that a victory for taxpayers?

    Cross-posted at The Corner.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to President Obama’s Fictional Spending Cuts

    1. Paul Dibble, Ada, MI says:

      Well put. Thank you for providing insights with precise facts like this.

    2. David, New York says:

      If this was a publicly traded company, our elected officials would be behind bars. How can they condemn the practices of Banking officials and then turn around and engage in this kind of financial shell game with the tax dollars of the American people? Not only do they get away with it, they're praised!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.