• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Another Government Boondoggle or Worthwhile Investment?

    With all the money that has been shelled out through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Act, it turns out that the State department has its hand out, too. The State Department is requesting funding for a Foreign Affairs Security Training Center — to provide U.S. diplomats, or at least those charged with protecting them, with a greater set of survival skills. Just this New year’s Eve, the killings of seven CIA employees at the CIA’s base in Khost Province, Afghanistan, near Pakistan, was a deadly reminder of the risks involved to civilians in the field. Nor is it a new phenomenon that diplomacy can be a dangerous business. Since and including the Iran hostage taking in 1979, 66 U.S. diplomats overseas have paid for their service to their country with their lives in violent incidents.

    Given this reality, a centralized training facility may not be such a bad idea. It would enable embassies to provide their own security personnel, and it might even convince embassy staff to venture out of their current fortress like structures more than they do now. Whether a new training center is considered a deplorable sign of the times or a much needed reality adjustment, it is clear that protection is critically important in some outposts. Diplomats better able to protect themselves may in the end feel less hesitant about engaging the local population. And the fact is that some of this training is already being done, piecemeal at other facilities.

    A complaint heard often from foreign capitals is that American diplomats are notoriously difficult to reach, ensconced as they are behind fortress like walls and draconian security screenings. Conducting diplomacy of any kind – the essence of which is human interaction – is almost impossible when fear for the personal safety of embassy staff overwhelms the mission. Since the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, and particularly since the U.S. engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan, embassy security has reached new levels.

    Private contractors providing protection have been controversial and difficult to oversee. The leadership and national security of the United States depends on the ability of our nation’s diplomats to function. The State Department needs people that are trained not just in traditional social interaction skills, but also in the use of modern technology,and survival in high risk environments. Ever since the near riot at State over deployments to Iraq, it has been clear that something had to be done.

    According to the State Department Fact Sheet No. 3, the Master Plan for the new Foreign Affairs Training Center requires a minimum of 1,250 acres of developable land, not including setback requirements, to accommodate the following program functions: Soft Skills Training, including simulation labs; Hard skills training, including driving tracks, outdoor firing and explosive ranges, mock urban environments, weapons and explosives storage; Life Support, including student housing and medical services, Infrastructure, and Operations, including cyber security, mobile security deployments, secure communications and defensive equipment and armored vehicle operations. The description of the facility certainly evokes a new kind of American diplomat, a kind of Agent 007, as facile in throwing grenades as bon mots.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Another Government Boondoggle or Worthwhile Investment?

    1. Jon, Minneapolis says:

      I nominate Detroit. They've already got the mock urban environment.

    2. Dan, Centreville says:

      Nope. They chose Ruthsburg, a small town on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. See http://wordpress.centreville-md.net/?p=1480 if you want to see how we are trying to keep this FASTC out of here.

    3. Pingback: Don’t Sell Your Property Without It | Resort Quest Mortgage

    4. Thomas, Centreville says:

      Yes, they chose Ruthsburg, a county in MD that suffers terribly in its economic woes. An unemployment rate that doubled in one year. Yet people like Dan from Centreville (currently employed by the Federal Govt.) are trying to keep it out by terrorizing business owners who support it and spreading false information. His got his Federal job. We want ours!

    5. Thomas, Centreville says:

      If you want an example of some of the threats going on…..there's a post of a threatening email from the crazy opposition posted on facebook. This is real folks. This is what happens when people get desperate.

      http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=46441&l

    6. J, Centreville says:

      Dan and his anti-business friends are nuts. Our area needs jobs and a local county board of commissioners that support the business community. This is about as green a project as we could ask for. Hopefully, if this project does not go through we can make the property a chicken poop recycling center.

    7. David Tuel ,Queen An says:

      I live in Ruthburg, MD where the GSA is planing to build FASTC and I feel it is not the place for this faciliy. It is not just a case of NIMBYism this faciliy (FASTC) belongs somewhere away from house and defnitely not next to Tuckahoe State Park ! How can anyone in good conscience believe this project will be good for the area ? I really think the lights and the noise

      will greatly impact the live of my community. The only ones I see for this project are the ones that think it will put money in their pockets and are not concerned with any of the effects it will have on the environment and family in the area.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×