<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Defeat the Death Tax, Know Your Opponent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/01/12/to-defeat-the-death-tax-know-your-opponent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/01/12/to-defeat-the-death-tax-know-your-opponent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macello Joe, Marin C</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2010/01/12/to-defeat-the-death-tax-know-your-opponent/#comment-83891</link>
		<dc:creator>Macello Joe, Marin C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=23330#comment-83891</guid>
		<description>In Knowlton v. Moore, where the U.S. Supreme Court heard objections to this so called &quot;Estate Tax&quot;, where it was argued as a &quot;Direct Tax&quot; the Supreme Court ruled that it was not a Direct Tax, however, the taxes collected on the subject estate was only .0164%.  It was not a huge sum as the rate is today (up to 55%).   Clearly it is a Direct Tax now, because it is &quot;Double Dipping&quot;, instead of it being a minor Transfer Tax.    What happened after the decision to cause the excessive rates as charged lately is what I would like to know?    I could live with .0164%! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Knowlton v. Moore, where the U.S. Supreme Court heard objections to this so called &quot;Estate Tax&quot;, where it was argued as a &quot;Direct Tax&quot; the Supreme Court ruled that it was not a Direct Tax, however, the taxes collected on the subject estate was only .0164%.  It was not a huge sum as the rate is today (up to 55%).   Clearly it is a Direct Tax now, because it is &quot;Double Dipping&quot;, instead of it being a minor Transfer Tax.    What happened after the decision to cause the excessive rates as charged lately is what I would like to know?    I could live with .0164%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

