• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Outside the Beltway: California Dreamin' Up Ways to Avoid Economic Disaster

    California, the land of sunshine, surfing, soaring unemployment and ballooning deficits, may be making moves to strip itself of one of its most costly and draconian environmental regulations: the cap-and-trade carbon tax. Meanwhile, the City of Los Angeles is turning to private industry for help in digging out of a financial hole.

    As reported in The Wall Street Journal, California Assemblyman Dan Logue started a campaign to suspend the state’s Global Warming Solutions Act, which The New York Times calls the “nation’s furthest-reaching global-warming law.” It was designed to reduce the state’s carbon emissions and is set to take effect in 2012. However, all indications are that the law would have devastating effects on the state’s already dismal economy.

    From The Wall Street Journal:

    This feel-good law to reduce the state’s carbon footprint was enacted with great hoopla by the Democratic legislature and Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006 when the state’s economy was growing and the jobless rate was 5%. The law requires that starting in 2012 the state must ratchet down its carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The politicians and green lobbies told voters this energy tax would create jobs—the same fairy tale many in Washington are repeating today.

    Now the jobless rate is 12.3%, 2.25 million Californians are unemployed, and the state government is broke. So Republican Assemblyman Dan Logue has begun collecting signatures for “The Global Warming Solutions Act,” a ballot initiative that would suspend California’s cap-and-trade scheme until the unemployment rate falls below 5.5%. He’s aiming to get it on the November ballot.

    According to The Wall Street Journal, recent studies have predicted that implementing the cap-and-trade legislation “could easily exceed $100 billion” and would cost the average household $3,857 per year. Logue’s Web site says the legislation will cost small businesses $49,691 per year, lead to a loss of 1.1 million jobs, and “result in a total loss of output of $182.649 billion.”

    In other words, the environmental law would create an entirely poisonous business environment.

    Regulations abound in California. The Wall Street Journal cites a study by the Governor’s Office of Small Business Advocacy which estimates that “the direct cost of current California regulation is $175 billion, or nearly twice the size of the state general fund budget and about $134,000 per small business each year.”

    Los Angeles, too, is recognizing the cost of regulations (not to mention budget deficits and plunging revenue.) The Wall Street Journal reports that the city could face a $1 billion budget deficit in two years and is currently suffering a 12.6% unemployment rate (it has lost 150,000 jobs since 2008.) Now, the city’s mayor is turning Austin Buetner, a private-equity executive, to help make the city “more business friendly.” The Wall Street Journal says Beutner “faces a daunting task.”

    Los Angeles business owners have long complained they are trapped in a tangle of regulations and taxes that make doing business in the city difficult and expensive. In a November survey of Los Angeles business owners, 74% characterized the city as unfriendly to business.

    “We have a city government that thinks last about the effects of laws and regulations on the business community, and how [those laws and regulations] affect businesses staying in Los Angeles and new business coming into the city,” said David Fleming, founder of the Los Angeles County Business Federation, an association of business chambers that conducted the survey.

    Extreme environmental regulations are costly and crippling to the economy? Deficit spending can cause fiscal catastrophe? Maybe California’s woes should be a message to Congress.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Outside the Beltway: California Dreamin' Up Ways to Avoid Economic Disaster

    1. Bobbie Jay says:

      Most members of government and all their affiliates need immediatel dismissal. After they take necessary steps in their personal expense of rehabilitating themselves BACK TO THE PRINCIPLES OF AMERICA, maybe they’ll meet requirements to run.

    2. Sara, California says:

      I believe they meant to say "so-called" Republican Governor…

    3. Kimberley in Albquer says:

      The global warming scare is based on scientific models of the global climate. Two characteristics of these types of models are that they become less reliable with increasing complexity and that reliability declines with time.

      Simple models can be very reliable over a relatively short term of time. That is why you can use modeling technology to develop nuclear weapons. There are actually a small number of important variables and the timeframe of an explosion is fairly short.

      The global climate is another matter. There are many variables (some including solar behavior that are not even on the globe) that must be included. The models have not proved to be predictive of even the number of hurricanes each year, or average annual temperature. We have these models for 20 years and the data is not that good. Yet the climatologist are very confident in predicting average temperature 100 years into the future. The 20-year predictions were not that good. Why should I believe the 100-year predictions?

      This is very consistent with common sense. What is not consistent with common sense is to reorder the economy based inherently unreliable models.

    4. Bob Marcus, Colorado says:

      This "global warming/climate change" movement has become a pseudo religion world wide and some of our politicians and other world leaders are caught up in the emotions and political correctness that feeds this pesudo religion. Where has common sense gone? Yes, we all need to do our part to conserve and take care of our planet but to continue to make rules, regulations and laws which attack other areas of our lives is non-sense. We used to live in California and moved to Colorado to buy and start small businesses due to the anti-business climate of that state.

    5. Global Law Guide says:

      CNSNews.com) – Elena Kagan, Presidency Barack Obama's pick to put unobtrusive Supreme Court Magistrate John Missionary Poet on the Dominant Regime, is superior familiar for squirming University Law Civilize absent from the 100-year old "case-law method" of legal learn.

      But in the process, critics say, she captive the nation's perform law civilise away from requiring the speculate of U.S. inbuilt law towards the contemplate of the laws of adventive nations and planetary law

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.