Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Budget 2011: Why Our Debt Matters

Posted January 4th, 2010 at 12:13pm in Ongoing Priorities 11 Print This Post Print This Post

Interest. Or to be more precise, interest payments. That, Heritage Senior Fellow J.D. Foster explains, is the biggest reason why Americans should be very concerned with the trillions of dollars in debt our federal government is piling up in Washington. Watch:

And the situation is only going to get worse under President Barack Obama’s budget. Heritage Foundation fellow Brian Riedl reports:

Federal spending (which has remained around 20 percent of economy since the 1950s) would surpass 28 percent of economy by 2019. Federal spending per household would rise from $25,000 per household in 2008 to more than $37,000 per household by 2019.

This spending would drive a permanent, unprecedented increase in the national debt. After borrowing just under $6 trillion from 1789 through 2008 (plus nearly $2 trillion in 2009), Washington would borrow $13 trillion over the next decade–nearly $100,000 for every household. By 2019, annual budget deficits would approach $2 trillion and push the public debt to nearly 100 percent of the economy. Merely paying the interest on this debt would soon cost taxpayers $1 trillion annually, and spending and deficits would continue to rise.

debtalbumgdp

For more charts see Heritage’s National Debt Charts Facebook photo album.

Tags: , , ,

11 Responses to “Budget 2011: Why Our Debt Matters”

  1. Paul Rinderle on at said:

    Spending is now so reckless the only way you can defend it is to say its purposeful so as to bankrupt America.

  2. susan prince Austin Texas on at said:

    Before we would allow ANYONE to “bankrupt America” financially, we must first have bought into the groundwork-lies of liberals which infiltrated our churches, the school systems and the media which infiltrated every American home; effectively “bankrupting America morally”.

  3. Bobbie Jay on at said:

    No taxes should be put on the people before government sacrifices! Imagine, without government perks and amenities and a reduction of pay to make more adequate, how more efficient this country would run.

    The economy will move forward, when government is removed everywhere it’s unconstitutional.

  4. Richard, Sparta NJ on at said:

    Paul Rinderle, you hit the nail on the head; it is purposeful. The Cloward-Piven Strategy in action as it has been by the left in the US for decades. This is just the latest version.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

  5. Tea Party Republican, Suwanee, GA on at said:

    Dave Ramsey for Secretary of the Treasury!

    Clark Howard for Comptroller of the Currency!

  6. Joe, Philadelphia on at said:

    Not sure it’s purposeful. The D (and many R’s) strategy is to give people “stuff” for their vote. That strategy only contemplates 2 year election cycles. They’re caught up in a death spiral now and there’s no way out.

  7. Mike, Wichita Falls on at said:

    As sad as this picture is to freedom-loving people, it doesn’t even address the looming SS, Medicare & Medicaid obligations and debt being imposed on current and future workers. (The proposed health care bill already has a hike in the Medicare tax.) How would this chart look with those programs in the mix?

    I believe candidates in the next few election cycles must also address these programs.

    I propose a SS opt-out program for workers under 45, or eliminate it entirely, while supplementing the plans of those older than 45 with general revenue, royalties from increased federal oil & gas production, etc.

    Slowly increase Medicare-recipient’s share of costs until it becomes self-sufficient or until private plans look more attractive.

    Slowly transfer Medicaid costs back to the states for their experimentation.

    I know…easier said than done, but it must at least be said.

  8. Tim Az on at said:

    I don’t think there will be enough wealth in the world to cover the spending of this evil administration if we do not stop it now. The election year has begun it may not be as hard as we think to stop it now. Those up for re-election must make public appearances. All that is needed is a replay of the town hall meetings every time they show themselves in public. You don’t have to say a word just hold up signs for them to read.

  9. Ron, ND on at said:

    If Obama can suceed in bankrupting America, it would create chaos and anarchy, reason to declare martial law and install a marxist government.

  10. Drew Page, IL on at said:

    Not only must the reckless spending stop, a new Congress must strive to undo much of what has been done by this Congress. Unspent TARP and Stimulus money needs to be used to pay down the national debt. Taxes on businesses and on capital gains must be lowered, not increased, in order to stimulate job growth.

    There must be no new social welfare programs established and/or funded until the national debt is brought down to 2007 levels. There needs to be a Constitutional amendment passed limiting government spending to budgeted amounts, except in time of war which is declared by both Houses of Congress. We also need to set term limits for members of Congress; no more than three terms in the House and no more than two terms in the Senate for any individual. A seat in the Senate or the House of Representatives should not be a career position. Salaries and insurance benefits should be provided for these positions, but not pensions. Representatives and Senators should be covered under Social Security and Medicare, just like the rest of us. If they were, I guarantee both systems would be fixed in short order.

  11. Lynn B. DeSpain on at said:

    You don’t need a high I.Q> nor a PHD., to know that if your debt exceeds your income, no one, no business, no nation, will sell, lend, or buy anything connected to you.
    Just look at Ford. They’ve had a great yar! People trust a company that did not take handouts, that stood its own ground and made it on its own. Meanwhile, no one is buying GM or Chrysler products, because they don’t know if the companies will be around long enouph to honor their warrenties, also that every time they see an advertisement, its our Tax dollars, and if a Citizen were to buy one its like paying your own money, for your own money!
    Credit given to Obama for bailing out the top two or three largest Banks, doesn’t mean anything either, even done twice! Check back in our own History and find that J.P. Morgan did the same thing, Twice, to forstall the Great Depression, but said ‘No’ to the third time, because it was inevitable, the system had to fail to rebuild.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.