• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • "Reset" on START Needs Another Reset

    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s recent rant regarding missile defense and arms control shows that U.S. and Russian negotiators failed to meet the December 5th deadline to sign a new arms control treaty to replace the now-expired START Treaty, not because of technical difficulties, but because of a fundamental question: what both sides see as necessary to “reset” U.S.-Russian relations.

    The START follow-on negotiations were to result in a treaty reducing strategic nuclear arms that also would serve as the cornerstone of the new bilateral relationship. Putin has made it clear that he, and presumably the Russian government, oppose U.S. missile defense systems because he views Russia’s preferred relationship with the U.S. as one based on its ability to threaten the U.S. with nuclear annihilation. He would include a provision in the new treaty that effectively prohibits an undefined set of missile defense options for the U.S. Putin’s statement clearly places the ball in the Obama Administration’s court in the arms control negotiations.

    The Obama Administration will have to make a decision whether Putin’s view of U.S.-Russian relations is the right one and that the U.S. deserves to be threatened by Russian nuclear forces or whether he will use the negotiations to convince Putin and the Russian government that the appropriate basis for improved U.S. and Russia relations is for both sides to adopt more defensive strategic postures. Opting for the former will improve the near-term prospects for signing the START follow-on treaty, but at the expense of missile defense. The latter will require lengthy diplomacy, but will preserve missile defense options for both the U.S. and Russia and establish a clearly more appropriate foundation for improved U.S.-Russian relations.

    That President Obama would not reject the Putin vision out of hand speaks volumes about his lack of confidence in the moral standing of the United States.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to "Reset" on START Needs Another Reset

    1. Pingback: Why Putin Fears U.S. Missile Defense | Conservative Principles Now

    2. Pingback: Why Putin Fears U.S. Missile Defense | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    3. POst. Vladimar as a member of WAND I am

      For reset on START I do not want WAR

      Nor like WAR's however I realize they

      Are needed at times except they do not

      Need to be Nuclear WAR'4 SIGN

      And AMEND if needed first so START

      Treaty is fair between America and

      Russia HIH Margaret Fullerton

      Henderson Spencer stuart Metrenich Helgiloland Romanov

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.