• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Inhofe Calls for Independent Investigation of IPCC

    More than 25 U.S. senators, led by Oklahoma Republican Jim Inhofe, are calling for an independent investigation of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the wake of the Climategate scandal.

    Inhofe, ranking member on the Environment and Public Works Committee, outlined several reasons for an independent investigation in a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is among those who signed the letter.

    Speaking at The Heritage Foundation this week, Inhofe said he had no confidence in the United Nations’ conducting an investigation of its own panel. “The U.N. isn’t accountable to anyone,” he argued, highlighting the problem of rooting out possible corruption in the IPCC.

    “The investigation must be conducted without political interference and manipulation from individual countries, non-governmental organizations, those within the U.N., those who have contributed to the IPCC, those being investigated, or any closely related associates,” Inhofe wrote in the letter (PDF).

    During his Heritage Foundation visit to The Bloggers Briefing on Tuesday, Inhofe noted how 10 years ago he began calling for his colleagues to slow down in taking action on climate change. Worried about the high costs estimated for action on climate change, Inhofe began his own investigation into the validity of the science behind the theory.

    He found that many scientists he talked to, including some from the IPCC, had been intimidated by the larger scientific community to stay quiet about their skepticism. Through these investigations he realized that the science had been “cooked.”

    Since then Inhofe has been leading the fight against climate change hysteria. The latest chapter in this fight has unfolded with the Climategate scandal. In light of evidence that not only has data been ignored and manipulated, but that dissenting voices were silenced, Inhofe vowed to aggressively pursue an independent investigation.

    There is precedent for an investigation. Irregularities in the U.N.’s Oil for Food Program led to an independent inquiry from Paul Volcker.

    When asked what it feels like to be proven right after all these years, he simply answered, “It’s called redemption.”

    With the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference in full swing, his timing couldn’t be better.

    “Countries from around the globe are in the process of negotiating agreements that could result in trillions of dollars of expenditures to mitigate the impacts of climate change,” Inhofe wrote. “We believe the actions proposed thus far are too costly and ineffective to address the task at hand. While we may disagree on policy, we should be able to agree that any such policies proposed rest on an accurate, credible, and objective scientific foundation.”

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Inhofe Calls for Independent Investigation of IPCC

    1. der schwarze Ritter says:

      It's time to bring the global cooling deniers to account and make them pay for their crimes. There should be Nuremburg-type show trials and their punishment should be everything they wanted to force upon the world: clown cars, vegetarianism, one-child policy, no commercial air travel, no SUVs, no big-screen TVs, no beer fridges, etc., etc.

    2. Alessandra of Austra says:

      Does the law not apply to these corrupt organisations? What legal system lets you investigate yourself? I hope we get our independent investigation, its the right way to go of we want the truth.

    3. Roger S., Ma. says:

      Stop funding the U.N. until they clearly and objectively practice the same openness and transparency which they demand of the rest of us! Make them publicly accountable for everything they do! Or no money from US! (Something Congress could do without much cost and which would benefit, for once, the whole world.)

    4. Stas Peterson says:

      Increasingly the recent, scientific evidence of the 21st century is that the whole CO2 sky-is-falling idea, is wrong.

      That is why Climategate happened.

      They would not have had to resort to all the nefarious lying, cheating, stealing, data destruction, character assassination and suppression of the evidence, if the scientific results were truly as bad as they say. It was because it increasingly appeared that there was no problem, that the AGW hypotheses were disproven, that they had to do so.

      Ask yourself the simple question. Why else LIE?

    5. R Morini New Hampsh says:

      Kudos to James Inhofe!!!!! Stop this calamity, and all this other bullcrap that is going on!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.