<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama’s Northern Exposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/10/obama%e2%80%99s-northern-exposure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/10/obama%e2%80%99s-northern-exposure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Obama Doctrine:What we heard articul&#8230; &#171; Legislative Aid</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/10/obama%e2%80%99s-northern-exposure/#comment-74349</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obama Doctrine:What we heard articul&#8230; &#171; Legislative Aid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21607#comment-74349</guid>
		<description>[...] Heritage: The most interesting aspect of the address was the effort to reconcile the Peace Prize with the fact that Obama is the president of a nation at war, leading to a lengthy and somewhat confused exposition of the concept of just war and defense of the troop surge in Afghanistan. In many ways, the speech was typical Obama, a masterpiece of one the one hand, on the other hand. No wonder the stoic Norwegian audience failed to show much enthusiasm. Indeed, the only line that aroused much enthusiasm was the reference to the closing of Guantanamo Bay. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Heritage: The most interesting aspect of the address was the effort to reconcile the Peace Prize with the fact that Obama is the president of a nation at war, leading to a lengthy and somewhat confused exposition of the concept of just war and defense of the troop surge in Afghanistan. In many ways, the speech was typical Obama, a masterpiece of one the one hand, on the other hand. No wonder the stoic Norwegian audience failed to show much enthusiasm. Indeed, the only line that aroused much enthusiasm was the reference to the closing of Guantanamo Bay. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/10/obama%e2%80%99s-northern-exposure/#comment-74333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21607#comment-74333</guid>
		<description>I also have a question of priority. Which comes first, the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT OR FREEDOM OF HER PEOPLE? We all know, live and breath the answer surrounding us. I want Obama&#039;s answer! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a question of priority. Which comes first, the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT OR FREEDOM OF HER PEOPLE? We all know, live and breath the answer surrounding us. I want Obama&#039;s answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

