• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • House 'Minibus' Not So Mini

    Congressional leadership has unveiled an a $446.8 billion “minibus” that will cover six annual appropriations bills, leaving only the defense bill to pass separately. Assuming these bills pass, discretionary spending will have jumped by 8 percent for the third consecutive year since the Democrats took control of Congress in 2007. In those three years, regular discretionary spending has jumped 25 percent, from $873 billion to $1,090 billion. But that’s not all. The recent stimulus bill provided an additional $311 billion in “emergency” discretionary spending. Altogether, the last three Congressional Democratic budgets have spent $561 billion more in discretionary spending than if they had limited growth to the baseline inflation rate.

    Non-defense discretionary programs—which have received most of the increases—have not exactly been starved in the past, either. From 2001 through 2008, these outlays grew 32 percent faster than inflation, due in part to large increases for education (31 percent), health research (30 percent), and international affairs (47 percent). Clearly, these programs do not need even more budget increases. Yet rather than ask federal agencies to join the American people in some recessionary belt-tightening, Congress gave these programs an 8 percent increase in FY 2009, and is in the process of adding another 8 percent for FY 2010 —not even counting the historic $311 billion in additional “stimulus” funding for these programs.

    This is not the budgeting of a Congress even minimally serious about the budget deficit. And each large annual discretionary spending increase becomes part of the permanent discretionary spending baseline. In fact, the steep increases over the past three years have added $1.7 trillion to the 2011-2020 discretionary spending baseline – nearly $1,500 per household annually.

    Unfortunately, the President’s budget agenda would continue this spending spree indefinitely. Federal spending (which has remained around 20 percent of GDP since the 1950s), would surpass 28 percent of GDP by 2019. Federal spending per household would rise from $25,000 per household in 2008 to more than $37,000 per household by 2019. This represents an enormous, permanent increase in the size of government.

    This spending would drive a permanent, unprecedented increase in the national debt. After borrowing just under $6 trillion from 1789 through 2008 (plus nearly $2 trillion in 2009), Washington would borrow $13 trillion over the next decade—nearly $100,000 for every household. By 2019, annual budget deficits would approach $2 trillion and push the public debt to nearly 100 percent of GDP. Merely paying the interest on this debt would soon cost taxpayers $1 trillion annually, and spending and deficits would continue rise.

    If a recession and $1.4 trillion budget deficits are not enough to persuade Congress to pare back the 8 percent growth rate in discretionary spending, what will it take? It’s business-as-usual in Washington.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to House 'Minibus' Not So Mini

    1. Freedom of Speech, T says:

      Why would ANYONE want to hire these people once they leave office?

      Simple. Their new job as lobbyists as a perfect fit. They now the ins and outs of Washington. They know how to game the system and they do it. Of course, this is perfectly legal – right now.

      No politician should be allowed to work as a lobbyist or be involved in government bids.

      Far too many "serve" the people on a silver platter while they enrich themselves.

      Americans should ask candidates their views or position on this topic. The corruption and virtual theft of taxpayer dollars is beyond criminal. This is the root of their power.

      They call it "compromise"; in reality it is quid pro quo, threats, political blackmail, payoffs.

      The average folks go to jail for FAR LESS. We won't even get into the pass these people get from the IRS.

      Wonder how those of us that speak out will be treated?

    2. Pingback: Is Obama offended by Norway’s ‘whiteness?”; BHO snubs royalty and concert but likely will blame Bush for it « VotingFemale Speaks!

    3. Pingback: Morning Bell: Speaker Pelosi’s Spendapalooza | Conservative Principles Now

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×