• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Bankruptcy: A Better Answer to “Too Big to Fail”

    The financial reform bill that is currently before the House would give regulators virtually unlimited power over “too big to fail” financial institutions. Those are large, complex and usually international entities whose failure could cause such a shock to the interconnected financial system that others would be endangered. Under the House bill, if one of them does get into trouble, the FDIC would step in to reorganize and run the financial institution until it could be closed or sold. The FDIC has done an acceptable job closing small and medium banks, but does not have the expertise necessary to deal with such complex companies.

    A better approach – described here and here — would be to add a new chapter to the bankruptcy code that is explicitly designed to meet the special circumstances of “too big to fail” financial institutions. Properly structured, the new chapter would make it easier for large financial firms to be closed in an orderly way that reduces the potential for systemic risk. It would not give regulators virtually unlimited powers and would free the process from political interference by giving control to an unbiased court system that already has extensive experience with complex modern firms. By creating an open process controlled by an impartial judiciary guided by established statutory rules, financial firms, investors, taxpayers, and others would have the advance knowledge that large financial firms that were once known as “too big to fail” can now be closed if necessary without risking disaster.

    This is one of several interesting ideas contained in a substitute to the House financial reform bill that will be proposed by Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL) and several other legislators. Bankruptcy is a far better way to deal with “too big to fail” financial institutions than any other alternative.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Bankruptcy: A Better Answer to “Too Big to Fail”

    1. Mark, Pittsburgh says:

      Yes,in concept this makes complete sense. Every time a to big to fail situation arises it gives the government an opportunity to take over an industry…..they love that.

    2. Edward Hake, Cincinn says:

      Is our big government too big to fail? Yes it is. It is time to return much of our governance back to the states.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×