<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Dioxide Regulations Display EPA’s Arrogance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Dean Meyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-200205</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Dean Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-200205</guid>
		<description>Regulating the Earth&#039;s atmosphere is way above the EPA&#039;s grade level.  I know a lot of al gore&#039;s and ohbummah&#039;s buddies are looking for a big pay day, but other than that, there is no reason to bust the USA economy based on a lot of false conclusions by a bunch of junk scientists and crooked politicians. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regulating the Earth&#039;s atmosphere is way above the EPA&#039;s grade level.  I know a lot of al gore&#039;s and ohbummah&#039;s buddies are looking for a big pay day, but other than that, there is no reason to bust the USA economy based on a lot of false conclusions by a bunch of junk scientists and crooked politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the Green Room: Congressman Rob Bishop (R-UT) on Guns, Property and the EPA &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-92786</link>
		<dc:creator>In the Green Room: Congressman Rob Bishop (R-UT) on Guns, Property and the EPA &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-92786</guid>
		<description>[...] Executive Branch.&#8221; This is an issue about which Heritage is also concerned and on which we have written [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Executive Branch.&#8221; This is an issue about which Heritage is also concerned and on which we have written [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Congressman Rob Bishop (R-UT) on Guns, Property and the EPA &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-92722</link>
		<dc:creator>Congressman Rob Bishop (R-UT) on Guns, Property and the EPA &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-92722</guid>
		<description>[...] Executive Branch.&#8221; This is an issue about which Heritage is also concerned and on which we have written extensively.Tags: congress, EPA, Foundry Videos, in the Green Room, mcdonald v. chicago, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Executive Branch.&#8221; This is an issue about which Heritage is also concerned and on which we have written extensively.Tags: congress, EPA, Foundry Videos, in the Green Room, mcdonald v. chicago, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamas Havas, Budapes</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-84041</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Havas, Budapes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-84041</guid>
		<description>I do not want hurt anybody. There are facts that the CO2 theory is wrong. 
If I wrote the 10^6+n th study it would volatile as the others. 
 
Dear moderator please consider it was a trial only. So I will not emerge again. 
I know it does not matter for this site. 
 
Best regards 
Tamas HavasI </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not want hurt anybody. There are facts that the CO2 theory is wrong.</p>
<p>If I wrote the 10^6+n th study it would volatile as the others.</p>
<p>Dear moderator please consider it was a trial only. So I will not emerge again.</p>
<p>I know it does not matter for this site.</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
<p>Tamas HavasI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topanga, Los Angeles</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-74785</link>
		<dc:creator>Topanga, Los Angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-74785</guid>
		<description>Wow, love the comments: conspiracy theorists much? Ridiculous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, love the comments: conspiracy theorists much? Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-74222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Minnesota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-74222</guid>
		<description>To Ken in St. Louis, 
When Nixon created the EPA, the cuyohoga (that river in Ohio)had caught fire from the pollution, Lake Erie was a dead sea.  I believe the EPA WAS necessary, but I agree it is a snowball rolling downhill and I can only hope it can be stopped.  Maybe a new congress can simply eliminate the EPA and start over with a new EPA which will work with legitimate enviornmental problems, not this climate change crap. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ken in St. Louis,</p>
<p>When Nixon created the EPA, the cuyohoga (that river in Ohio)had caught fire from the pollution, Lake Erie was a dead sea.  I believe the EPA WAS necessary, but I agree it is a snowball rolling downhill and I can only hope it can be stopped.  Maybe a new congress can simply eliminate the EPA and start over with a new EPA which will work with legitimate enviornmental problems, not this climate change crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobRGeologist Tucso</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-73902</link>
		<dc:creator>BobRGeologist Tucso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-73902</guid>
		<description>This fixation on greenhouse gasses has been hyped by idiots such as Al Gore whose ignorance of real science is abysmal. Without greenhouse gasses the Earth would soon become an iceball because there would be nothing to retain the sun&#039;s heat from radiating back into space. It wouldn&#039;t matter all that much because without CO2 there would be no vegitation for animals to feed on. Without the chief greenhouse gas, water vapor, we would have no rain. So, villifying greenhouse gases as our EPA has done, if it were possible for man to eliminate them, which fortunately man cannot possibly do, saves us from comitting suicide by starvation and the Earth from resembling Mars. Now,followinf this obviously simple chain of scientific reasoning, this leaves EPA with out any excuse for existence, leaving us with proof that Government is our problem, not our solution. 
Just to make the cheese more binding, why are this bunch of idiots in Copenhagen this week trying to decide on how much CO2 to allow in the air when scientific research, funded by over $30 billion in research grants alone, has been unable  to prove one scrap of empirical evidence  
that CO2 produced by man&#039;s activities has any 
significant effect on the global climate. I can&#039;t imagine how this hare-brained scenario was conceived outside a nuthouse. As if this is not enough, only week ago &quot;climate gate&quot; came along to cast further illigitimacy in that a passel of emails were unearthed indicating a group of well known climate scientists at an English university that been a clearing house for climate data, had been a hotbed of scientific malfeasance to keep this sorry hypothesis of AGW alive and still our Government loves it, proof that love is blind, for the biggest scandal that science has ever had. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This fixation on greenhouse gasses has been hyped by idiots such as Al Gore whose ignorance of real science is abysmal. Without greenhouse gasses the Earth would soon become an iceball because there would be nothing to retain the sun&#039;s heat from radiating back into space. It wouldn&#039;t matter all that much because without CO2 there would be no vegitation for animals to feed on. Without the chief greenhouse gas, water vapor, we would have no rain. So, villifying greenhouse gases as our EPA has done, if it were possible for man to eliminate them, which fortunately man cannot possibly do, saves us from comitting suicide by starvation and the Earth from resembling Mars. Now,followinf this obviously simple chain of scientific reasoning, this leaves EPA with out any excuse for existence, leaving us with proof that Government is our problem, not our solution.</p>
<p>Just to make the cheese more binding, why are this bunch of idiots in Copenhagen this week trying to decide on how much CO2 to allow in the air when scientific research, funded by over $30 billion in research grants alone, has been unable  to prove one scrap of empirical evidence </p>
<p>that CO2 produced by man&#039;s activities has any</p>
<p>significant effect on the global climate. I can&#039;t imagine how this hare-brained scenario was conceived outside a nuthouse. As if this is not enough, only week ago &quot;climate gate&quot; came along to cast further illigitimacy in that a passel of emails were unearthed indicating a group of well known climate scientists at an English university that been a clearing house for climate data, had been a hotbed of scientific malfeasance to keep this sorry hypothesis of AGW alive and still our Government loves it, proof that love is blind, for the biggest scandal that science has ever had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-73874</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-73874</guid>
		<description>Truly worthless, including government, spending time, wasting money, debating a non-existence.  
 
All programs that started in the past had true intent, respect and discipline to do their job as intended. Today those programs fell from the disciplined initiated intent to the opposite. Costly and corrupt, continually make millions holding citizens back with their fear mongering of non-existent man-made global warming. creating senseless, wasteful, inefficient, unnecessary tax-paid green-jobs to credit their claim.  
 
Where did each of all who believe in man-made global warming get their closed minded education? government?  
 
It may be beneficial in defense of our liberty, to research the genesis of this government made global-crisis scam? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly worthless, including government, spending time, wasting money, debating a non-existence. </p>
<p>All programs that started in the past had true intent, respect and discipline to do their job as intended. Today those programs fell from the disciplined initiated intent to the opposite. Costly and corrupt, continually make millions holding citizens back with their fear mongering of non-existent man-made global warming. creating senseless, wasteful, inefficient, unnecessary tax-paid green-jobs to credit their claim. </p>
<p>Where did each of all who believe in man-made global warming get their closed minded education? government? </p>
<p>It may be beneficial in defense of our liberty, to research the genesis of this government made global-crisis scam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill, Charleston WV</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-73864</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, Charleston WV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-73864</guid>
		<description>The EPA can be controlled if Congress were to remove its authority to regulate carbon dioxide but this will not happen since they are using it as an excuse to force cap and trade.  If carbon dioxide is a health hazard in the atmosphere then why is it also not a health hazard if pumped into the ground where it is sure to escape into groundwater? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EPA can be controlled if Congress were to remove its authority to regulate carbon dioxide but this will not happen since they are using it as an excuse to force cap and trade.  If carbon dioxide is a health hazard in the atmosphere then why is it also not a health hazard if pumped into the ground where it is sure to escape into groundwater?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark, Maryland</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/08/carbon-dioxide-regulations-display-epa%e2%80%99s-arrogance/#comment-73847</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark, Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=21367#comment-73847</guid>
		<description>Hey EPA! 
 
The after-effect of your ruling on carbon dioxide is that I have chosen, starting yesterday, to take all the paper products out of my recycling bin and burn them instead in my open fire pit.  It is a minor gesture, but I hope it serves as a stick in your collective eye in reaction to your stupid, absurd declaration that CO2 is harmful to life.  It must be true that a requirement for employment in your agency is to have failed every science class at every level since Kindgergarten. 
 
Leave my lifestyle alone.  I burn what I can because you exist. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey EPA!</p>
<p>The after-effect of your ruling on carbon dioxide is that I have chosen, starting yesterday, to take all the paper products out of my recycling bin and burn them instead in my open fire pit.  It is a minor gesture, but I hope it serves as a stick in your collective eye in reaction to your stupid, absurd declaration that CO2 is harmful to life.  It must be true that a requirement for employment in your agency is to have failed every science class at every level since Kindgergarten.</p>
<p>Leave my lifestyle alone.  I burn what I can because you exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

