• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obamacare in the Senate: Cutting Medicare

    Last week’s consideration of amendments to Obamacare focused on Medicare, which is used as one of the main sources of funding for the expansion of Medicaid and the establishment of a new health care entitlement under Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) bill.

    The McCain Amendment. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) offered an amendment to recommit and require the Senate Finance Committee to revise Sen. Reid’s health care bill to exclude all spending cuts to Medicare. Senate Democrats include nearly $500 billion in Medicare cuts to pay for the legislation. Sen. McCain said that simply cutting the funding of one entitlement program to create another federal entitlement program would not constitute reform. Instead, hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending will be added to the federal deficit.

    With an estimated $60 billion lost each year to fraud, waste, and abuse, Medicare needs reform. But the Congressional Budget Office’s score of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shows minuscule savings from eliminating or reducing fraud, waste, or abuse in the bill. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) noted: “We could cover everybody in the country or extend the life of Medicare 20 years by eliminating the fraud that’s in Medicare today. What are we going to do? We’re not. We’re going to create more government programs and more agencies that are going to be designed to be defrauded.” Sen. McCain’s Medicare amendment was defeated by a vote of 42-58.

    The Bennett Amendment. Meanwhile, Senator Michael Bennett (D-CO) offered an amendment that would prohibit any reduction in the guaranteed benefits of Medicare enrollees, and would require that savings in Medicare that result from the legislation would increase Medicare solvency, lower premiums, expand benefits, and improve access to providers.

    But Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and others pointed out that the Bennett amendment is less than meets the eye: “ the concern on our side…is that it does not require that the savings from Medicare would only — with emphasis upon the word only — be used for that purpose.” In other words, savings in Medicare would still be used to fund a new federal health entitlement.

    In any case, promised cuts to Medicare rarely materialize, because they are often restored after they are enacted in the next legislative cycle. In the case of the Senate bill, the cuts would come from reductions in payments to Medicare Advantage and health care providers such as hospitals, hospices, and nursing homes. While the benefits may be formally guaranteed – thus remain on the books- by the Bennett Amendment, it is the effective reduction in Medicare reimbursement that results in reduced access to those benefits. Cuts to medical professionals who deliver services result in less access to those services, regardless of the paper formality of their provision in the Medicare program. In that respect, Senator Bennett’s amendment is either one that would result in real reductions in services for seniors or one that would not result in real savings and thus be effectively meaningless. Nonetheless, the Bennett Amendment was unanimously agreed to by the Senate.

    Kathryn Nix currently is a member of the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Obamacare in the Senate: Cutting Medicare

    1. Freedom of Speech, T says:

      The giant shell game continues.

      Why would ANYONE not want to eliminate fraud and waste?

      This just shows, ad nauseum, that most politicians could care less about the taxpayers' money.

      It's easier to just further tax and squeeze Americans than to act morally and responsibly.

      These people are sick.

    2. Bobbie Jay says:

      The government majority is immoral with increasing irresponsibilities. INVADING, CORRUPTING, DESTROYING THE LIVELIHOODS OF THE PEOPLE!

    3. Norris Hall says:

      A very well thought out piece.

      Just one mention

      "With an estimated $60 billion lost each year to fraud, waste, and abuse, Medicare needs reform"

      Has any reputable and unbiased institution done an official estimate of how much medicare fraud occurs each year. I assume it's a big amount but to throw out figures like "an estimated $60" sounds like shaky journalism to me.

      Could someone cite an official CBO report or some other exhaustive research into the actual amount.

      I say this because for years Tort reform advocates were throwing out figures like $50 to $200 billion dollars a year on how much legal liability and defensive medicine added to health care costs.

      2009 when the Congressional Budget Office crunched the numbers it downsized that $200 billion dollar estimate down to a much smaller $5.4 billion dollars.

      To be sure $5.4 billion is a lot of money…about as much as we've been spending each month for the last 8 years in Iraq and Afghanistan. But no where near $200 billion a year

      cite your sources please

    4. Pingback: Obamacare in the Senate: Medicare Solvency and Patient Satisfaction | Fix Health Care Policy

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×