- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
CBO Report Shows ObamaCare Raises Premiums
Posted By Mike Gonzalez On December 3, 2009 @ 3:34 pm In Obamacare | Comments Disabled
Media coverage of the CBO scoring  of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s health care bill  left out some of the fine print and heroic assumptions that were in the report. The Heritage Foundation believes they merit your consideration.
The media quotes the CBO as saying that ObamaCare would not make premiums rise for people who get their insurance through their job or other groups. This is mostly because millions of people would no longer receive coverage from their employer, and instead would buy insurance in the so-called “non-group” market that sells individual health plans. These would likely be older and sicker Americans.
While this transition could make premiums cheaper for those who would continue to receive health benefits through their workplace, they would likely see higher taxes down the road for subsidies that would be offered to people buying individual insurance, the CBO reports . And the CBO notes that other taxes imposed on medical device manufacturers, insurers and other providers would be passed onto consumers “in the form of higher premiums for private coverage.”
Additionally, the CBO said Sen. Reid’s health care bill would raise premium rates for people who buy it in the so-called “non-group” markets, and these increases would be 10 to 13 percent. So anyone who cites the CBO as saying Americans would not see their premiums jump assumes that employers will not dump their workers into an exchange where people get insurance individually.
There Is a Crowd-Out Effect
And that’s an assumption that goes too far. In fact, the CBO notes that roughly 6.4 million people who have work-based health coverage under the current law would lose it under Sen. Reid’s bill. That’s because some businesses would find it unaffordable to offer health care to their workers under the Reid bill. They’ll opt for paying the $750 fine and dumping their workers onto a health exchange. Many older and sicker employees would likely lose their job-based coverage, even if they like it, according to the CBO. Businesses would push these workers to get their health care in the “non-group” or individual market because it’s cheaper for companies. But as noted above, it’s not a better deal for the individuals.
Younger People Assumed to Fall in Line
At the other end of the spectrum, the CBO analysts make the assumption that younger, healthier workers are going to comply with the “individual mandate” in the bill. That’s the one that forces every American to buy health insurance or pay a fine (a provision whose constitutionality has been and will continue to be questioned). However, these younger workers will look at the option between a much more expensive, mandated health plan — providing benefits they don’t want or need — and a less expensive annual fine and be much more likely to forgo the health insurance plan and pay the fine. As the CBO reports , it’s the younger workers who are the biggest losers in this “reform.”
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/03/cbo-report-shows-obamacare-raises-premiums/
URLs in this post:
 CBO scoring: http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=434
 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s health care bill: http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act.pdf
 media quotes the CBO as saying that ObamaCare would not make premiums rise : http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/health/policy/01health.html
 the CBO reports: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10781/11-30-Premiums.pdf
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.