• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Barney Frank's Plan: A Permanent TARP?

    The House Financial Services Committee yesterday OK’d a key part of Barney Frank’s agenda for reform of the financial industry yesterday, voting to 31-27 to adopt his plan for so-called “too-big-to-fail” banks. The measure has been widely touted as providing a way to avoid future budget-busting bailouts of the industry.

    That would be welcome. After a year of seemingly endless TARP bailouts and abuses, most taxpayers want to make sure that we never go down that road again. The problem: far from making future TARPs less likely, the Frank plan actually paves the road for more.

    The bill would give financial regulators sweeping powers to control firms deemed “too big to fail” — those whose messy failure would put the entire financial system at risk. But this puts quite a lot of faith in regulators, who — having missed the last crisis — clearly have no magic ball for determining risk. As Heritage senior fellow David John points out, the authority will likely be used to limit newer lines of business instead of traditional ones, depriving consumers of the real benefits of financial innovation.

    Making things even worse, the real life effect of the new powers will be to signal to markets that the targeted firms are supported by the federal government, and guaranteed against failure — thus leading them to take more undue risks, not more.

    American Enterprise Institute scholar Peter Wallison summed it up well, saying: “Regulation doesn’t work,” adding: “And now they’re proposing regulation that doesn’t work for the entire financial industry.”

    But the Frank bill doesn’t stop at regulation. It also would give the FDIC broad power to seize and close failing financial institutions, with limited court review of its actions. And most disturbingly, it would establish a fund for FDIC to use to resolve the affairs of firms it takes over. This is the final irony: Rather than avoid future bailouts, the proposal would facilitate them. As Wallison put it, Congress will have created a permanent TARP.

    There is an alternative: bankruptcy, the time-tested procedure for dealing with economic failure. With a few minor changes, the bankruptcy code could be more effectively used by failing financial firms to allow them to fail in an orderly fashion, without threatening the broader financial system.

    Congress should rethink its rush to regulation and more bailouts, and instead work to make failure a real option for financial firms. This is a task which is too big to get wrong.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    10 Responses to Barney Frank's Plan: A Permanent TARP?

    1. joe maine says:

      perm tarp govt guranteed business through govt!! no buiness entrepreneurs? no private sector

    2. Bill Sinclair says:

      $1 trillion defecit under Bush; $14 trillion under the obamma regeime. Seriously, can we not demand resignations? Can 'we the people' not join together and have these fools tried for treason? They party like there's no tomorrow.

    3. James Baldwin says:

      Okay… you know what… instead of a $1 trillion bailout…

      Wait for it… wait for it…

      $50 TRILLION BAILOUT!

      Given the Kleptocracy that we currently live under and their fundamental inabilities to understand global finance, I say let's just get the crash over with and then start all over, enabling Darwinism to take its course.

    4. mindy from chattanoo says:

      wake up! do not do one thing barney is in favor of…this is one of the people who was happy when the steagall glass banking act was repealed in 1999! the one act that protected Americans from financial meltdown!

      he will do anything to bring us crashing down!

    5. John Kearney says:

      Once again good old Barney is trying to get something by all to give Obama bailout authority without having to come back for permission from congress/Senate on tarp $$$.

      Also backing of Acorn and refinancing them!

      Who elected this fool anyway?

    6. Pingback: Speaker Pelosi’s Job-Killing Agenda « Thoughts Of A Conservative Christian

    7. Pingback: Morning Bell: Speaker Pelosi’s Job-Killing Agenda | Fix Health Care Policy

    8. Pingback: Morning Bell: Speaker Pelosi’s Job-Killing Agenda | Step Down Obama

    9. Pingback: Morning Bell: Speaker Pelosi’s Job-Killing Agenda | Conservative Principles Now

    10. Pingback: Speaker Pelosi’s Job-Killing Agenda | RightReborn.com

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×