• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Video: How Obamacare Rations Mammograms

    Sens. John Barrasso (R-WY) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) recently hosted Center for American Progress blogger Igor Volsky on their Senate Doctors Show. Volsky challenged Sen. Barrasso to identify where in the Senate Health Bill it empowers the federal government to ration mammograms. And Sen. Barrasso does. Watch:

    Here is how we covered the issue last week:

    Both the House and Senate versions of Obamacare create detailed new federal regulations that micromanage all health insurance decisions. Specifically, Section 2713 of the Senate Health Bill would give the recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force the force of law by requiring all health insurance plans to provide coverage (with no patient co-pays) for “items or services that have in effect a rating of “A” or “B” [recommended] in the current recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force.”

    Conversely, under Obamacare, last week’s Task Force decision to give annual mammograms a “C” rating (not recommended) will henceforth be viewed by insurers and employers as a justification for discontinuing coverage. This move to give the evidence-based medicine determinations of health experts the force of law is not incidental to Obamacare: this cost control rationing is the very heart of Obamacare’s promise to control health care costs. Trying to convince wayward moderates that Obamacare would control health care costs, White House Budget Director Peter Orszag wrote in the Washington Post last Friday:

    An independent Medicare commission … will ensure that reforming the health-care system is not a one-time event but an ongoing process that implements the most recent progress in medical science with the goal of improving care and lowering costs.

    In other words, when the Obamacare health experts conclude that the “medical science” dictates that your mammograms must be cut to meet “the goal of … lowering costs,” then you’ll be out of luck.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Video: How Obamacare Rations Mammograms

    1. J.C. Hughes, Texas says:

      Although Conn's informative blogs are very much appreciated, I wish HF would focus more on challenging the constitutionality of "Obamacare" and/or any other tax funded federal competition to states and private healthcare markets. Maybe I'm off base, but to even debate the details of such proposed nationalized healthcare is wrong and down right nauseating. No thanks Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi, I'll buy the anti-emetic myself.

    2. Roger S., Ma. says:

      J.C. : Well said:

      My take is that the most perverted of the many unconscionable provisions in this bill are there for no other purpose than to get everybody debating their relative (de-)merits while forgetting that the whole thing is an abomination needing to be dumped. Thus, it becomes more likely to be passed into law minus (a few) particularly onerous clauses which will be replaced with ones equally onerous on some future date.

      The whole process resembles a used car salesman getting you involved in a discussion about reducing the price on account of some minor cosmetic flaws while you're supposed to forget that engine and tranny were making weird noises indicative of advanced age and poor health. God help you if you buy that jalopy at any price! (To palm it off to some "sucker" was all he wanted.)

      Basic principles of future governance are the real issue. Here it fails on all counts.

    3. Bobbie Jay says:

      Why isn't thermo imaging being used? It's more accurate, it's less invasive and less expensive! Too workable? Too easy of a fix? Too much of a convenience? Too comforting? Too much, a right and sustainable answer? Can't be used because government didn't think of it? Government Ignorance?


    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.