• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Race, Marriage and a False Analogy

    Brushing aside criticism that it is savaging religious liberty and some of the most reliable social services in the District of Columbia, the D.C. City Council today is set to approve a bill to end the protected status of traditional marriage. The collision between the redefinition of marriage and religious liberty is being closely followed – and now more attention is being devoted to the collision between that redefinition and the traditional understanding of civil rights.

    A new column over the weekend by Johns Hopkins graduate student Taylor Harris makes the point in a compelling way. Harris, who is African American, takes NAACP leader Julian Bond to task for equating opposition to same-sex marriage with racial prejudice. Harris faults Bond for trying “to peg African Americans’ morals and opinions to our socio-historical identities.” Harris underscores that two-thirds of African-American Protestants support traditional marriage, and that, at 12.8 percent of the population, they are not the difference makers in all of the 31 states that have voted to date to uphold the traditional understanding.

    African-Americans are prominent among the 167 religious leaders who have signed the Manhattan Declaration, released on November 20, which commits its signatories to defend traditional marriage, the sanctity of human life, conscience rights, and religious liberty. They include Bishops Harry Jackson and George Dallas McKinney, and Pastors Herb Lusk of Philadelphia and Ken Hutcherson of Kirkland, Washington. The vast majority of the signers, however, are not African American. What they have in common is best understood by the Declaration’s assertion that it seeks to “reaffirm fundamental truths about justice and the common good, and to call upon our fellow citizens, believers and non-believers alike, to join us in defending them.”

    For this reason and others, like the leadership of civil rights leader Walter Fauntroy in behalf of traditional marriage, attempts to parallel redefinition of marriage with the civil rights marches of the 1960s are doomed from the outset.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×