• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Ready, Fire, Aim: GAO Questions Timing of Broadband Stimulus Grants

     As if the Administration’s stimulus program didn’t have enough problems, the Government Accountability Office has now issued a report raising concerns on the handling of $7.2 billion in broadband communications grants warning the programs “present risks of waste, fraud and abuse“.

    The agencies – the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service were charged with awarding grants to help build out broadband Internet infrastructure, such as bringing wireless broadband connectivity to 41 Minneapolis public housing high-rises. But the complete mapping data on where investment is needed won’t be available until March 2010. This lack of data, the GAO warns, combined with staffing challenges and a deadline of September 2010 to award the grants, “may pose risks to the thoroughness of the application evaluation process.”

    The GAO also had concerns about agencies ability to administer a program of that scale. The NTIA and RUS both expect to fund around 1000 projects each before the September 30th deadline. Previously, the NTIA’s Technology Opportunities Program has averaged a total of 55 grants per year while the RUS’s Broadband Access Loan Program averaged 15. The average amounts for each project by the NTIA and RUS is estimated to be $4.35 million and $9 million respectively. In the past, the average grant for the Technology Opportunities Program was $382,000 while the average amount for the Broadband Access Loan Program was $521,000. The GAO has also warned that the programs may lack the ability to effectively monitor the projects to completion.

    This is not the first time that concerns have been raised on the handling of the stimulus funds for broadband infrastructure. Some have also questioned the seemingly excessive $350 million that Congress has allocated for the production of a national broadband map to aid the government on where to best direct the funds. Currently, approximately $125 million has been requested. And, as the AP reported: Rory Altman, director at telecommunications consulting firm Altman Vilandrie & Co., noted that “even $100 million may be high”. Altman added that his firm “could create a national broadband map for $3.5 million and would gladly do it for $35 million.” Similarly, the AP added: “Dave Burstein, editor of the DSL Prime broadband industry newsletter, believes a reasonable cost for the map would be less than $30 million.”

    Of course for many, spending is the whole point of a stimulus. But, as the GAO report shows, spending is easy. Spending effectively is the hard part.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Ready, Fire, Aim: GAO Questions Timing of Broadband Stimulus Grants

    1. Freedom of Speech, T says:

      MORE taxpayer dollars down the cra—r.

      How much more "lost" unaccountable money are we going to tolerate? As much as congress wants to spend.

      On a side issue, where's the federal investigation on ACORN? Where's the AG on this one? Nowhere.

    2. Roger S., Ma. says:

      Allegedly the "stimulus" had been meant for "shovel ready"

      projects. The only thing(s) apparently "ready" here were –

      the shovels! Ready to shovel your/our (future) money.

      Way to go, Government! Nothing like having a shovel by your

      side at all times, right? Money by the truckload, except to

      those who'll have to pay. That's us! Thanks a lot! 2010's

      already on the calendar! (No wonder the budget's always in the red!)

    3. Emily3264, Rainier, says:

      I encourage everyone to spend a few minutes looking at the backgrounds of your state & federal rep's. If your district is anything like mine, you may be shocked to find out that not one person representing you has done anything except work for the government, sit on fine arts boards, work for a government agency or non-profit. We need to put people in office that have held real jobs in the private sector.

    4. Pingback: Posts at Heritage « Meinan's Blog

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.