<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morning Bell: Victory In Afghanistan Is No Excuse For Raising Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Datinnoth</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-85674</link>
		<dc:creator>Datinnoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-85674</guid>
		<description>Very nice Blog, I will tell my friends about it. 
 
Thanks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice Blog, I will tell my friends about it.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock, New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71686</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock, New Hampshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71686</guid>
		<description>Murtha can dare mention revenue spending when he&#039;s already been exposed as the ear-mark champ he is? .... that airport in Pa (named after him, servicing about 30 people a day) is only one example and I hope he&#039;s being investigated for more 
 
Perhaps I&#039;m naive (even tho a former Marine) but what are the REAL additional costs when our Armed Forces are in combat?  REAL meaning over and above what is already expended (pay, basic materiel, etc) wherever they are, whatever the &quot;wartime&quot; situation is </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murtha can dare mention revenue spending when he&#039;s already been exposed as the ear-mark champ he is? &#8230;. that airport in Pa (named after him, servicing about 30 people a day) is only one example and I hope he&#039;s being investigated for more</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#039;m naive (even tho a former Marine) but what are the REAL additional costs when our Armed Forces are in combat?  REAL meaning over and above what is already expended (pay, basic materiel, etc) wherever they are, whatever the &quot;wartime&quot; situation is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athens, Alabama</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71389</link>
		<dc:creator>Athens, Alabama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71389</guid>
		<description>Instead of adding taxes to overtaxed hardworking citizens to help pay for the war, why not charge a tax on these crooked congressmen for their wasteful vote-buying projects. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of adding taxes to overtaxed hardworking citizens to help pay for the war, why not charge a tax on these crooked congressmen for their wasteful vote-buying projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Dolven- Arizon</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71343</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Dolven- Arizon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71343</guid>
		<description>Best solution to the out of control spending by Obama&#039;s administration and Congress ----We need to send Congress on a 1 year recess!  We don&#039;t need any more bills passed or laws made!!  When we, as individuals and businesses can&#039;t pay our bills, we cut our spending.  Why can&#039;t our Congress and Obama get it thru their thick skulls that we are headed for bankruptcy if we don&#039;t stop the spending and proposed spending NOW! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best solution to the out of control spending by Obama&#039;s administration and Congress &#8212;-We need to send Congress on a 1 year recess!  We don&#039;t need any more bills passed or laws made!!  When we, as individuals and businesses can&#039;t pay our bills, we cut our spending.  Why can&#039;t our Congress and Obama get it thru their thick skulls that we are headed for bankruptcy if we don&#039;t stop the spending and proposed spending NOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger S., Ma.</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71235</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger S., Ma.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71235</guid>
		<description>Really connecting the dots is the quote of Kevin Williamson: &quot;...&#8220;temporary&#8221; taxes levied during war time, like the 1898 tax on telephone services to pay for the Spanish-American War, have a nasty habit of becoming permanent.&quot;  
 
That seems to be about the understatement of a century. -- Has ANY tax ever been removed (not -temporarily- reduced, repealed) without being replaced by a similar tax to cover much the same entity? That would be a list to &quot;study&quot;. Intuition tells me it might be short. -- However the case, taxes to support entitlements are the most destructive of all, for being the most disruptive of individual responsibility. That not only applies to the recipients, but also in a far worse way to the dispensers of such &quot;gifts&quot;, whom it apparently corrupts almost totally, even to the point of ignoring or denying constitutional mandates. 
 
Below, the short history of a &quot;long&quot; tax:  
 
In the very late 1800&#039;s Germany&#039;s young emperor, Wilhelm_II, decided that his country&#039;s &quot;...future lay upon the high seas.&quot; Heavy commercial trade with China and a few &quot;fresh colonies&quot; in SE_Africa  confirmed him in his view. Being also somewhat the &quot;poor relation&quot; of Queen Victoria, and a bit insecure, he felt the need to impress. He rationalized that it would be appropriate to Germany&#039;s new status as an emerging world power to have a navy able to demonstrate this &quot;fact&quot; to an astonished world. 
 
But, how to pay for it? Well, ships being traditionally christened by the breaking of a good bottle of Champagne, and the moneyed classes enjoying this beverage rather copiously and conspicuously, the good emperor thought he could scarcely do harm by imposing a tax on all &quot;sparkling wines&quot;. So he did. 
 
His navy got built in time to enter WWI, where it was still out-gunned by the British. The war was lost. The emperor was exiled to Holland, all remaining ships surrendered as per armistice agreement to the Admiralty in 1919 -- albeit scuttled by their own crews.  
 
The &quot;young&quot; ships of an aging former emperor now &quot;resting&quot; at the bottom of the ocean, guess what wasn&#039;t scuttled, to this very day? Right: the tax. What once applied to an &quot;emperor&#039;s&quot; more prosperous subjects survived the &quot;Revolution&quot; of 1919; the Weimar Republic, including the great hyperinflation of the early 20&#039;s; the Third Reich and its total collapse between 1945 and 1948.  Survived, to now be &quot;shared&quot; by all, including the &quot;lowliest&quot; of free citizen who may have acquired a taste for now no longer unaffordable sparkling wine of any kind. Had Charles Dickens lived a century later, he might have written &quot;A Tale of Two Navies and A Tax&quot;. 
 
Taxes have long legs. Tough to outrun them. 
Taxes have long lives. Tough to outlive them. 
Taxes adapt to a changing body politic. Tough even to out-morph them. Some would say, &quot;impossible&quot;. I would tend to agree. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really connecting the dots is the quote of Kevin Williamson: &quot;&#8230;&ldquo;temporary&rdquo; taxes levied during war time, like the 1898 tax on telephone services to pay for the Spanish-American War, have a nasty habit of becoming permanent.&quot; </p>
<p>That seems to be about the understatement of a century. &#8212; Has ANY tax ever been removed (not -temporarily- reduced, repealed) without being replaced by a similar tax to cover much the same entity? That would be a list to &quot;study&quot;. Intuition tells me it might be short. &#8212; However the case, taxes to support entitlements are the most destructive of all, for being the most disruptive of individual responsibility. That not only applies to the recipients, but also in a far worse way to the dispensers of such &quot;gifts&quot;, whom it apparently corrupts almost totally, even to the point of ignoring or denying constitutional mandates.</p>
<p>Below, the short history of a &quot;long&quot; tax: </p>
<p>In the very late 1800&#039;s Germany&#039;s young emperor, Wilhelm_II, decided that his country&#039;s &quot;&#8230;future lay upon the high seas.&quot; Heavy commercial trade with China and a few &quot;fresh colonies&quot; in SE_Africa  confirmed him in his view. Being also somewhat the &quot;poor relation&quot; of Queen Victoria, and a bit insecure, he felt the need to impress. He rationalized that it would be appropriate to Germany&#039;s new status as an emerging world power to have a navy able to demonstrate this &quot;fact&quot; to an astonished world.</p>
<p>But, how to pay for it? Well, ships being traditionally christened by the breaking of a good bottle of Champagne, and the moneyed classes enjoying this beverage rather copiously and conspicuously, the good emperor thought he could scarcely do harm by imposing a tax on all &quot;sparkling wines&quot;. So he did.</p>
<p>His navy got built in time to enter WWI, where it was still out-gunned by the British. The war was lost. The emperor was exiled to Holland, all remaining ships surrendered as per armistice agreement to the Admiralty in 1919 &#8212; albeit scuttled by their own crews. </p>
<p>The &quot;young&quot; ships of an aging former emperor now &quot;resting&quot; at the bottom of the ocean, guess what wasn&#039;t scuttled, to this very day? Right: the tax. What once applied to an &quot;emperor&#039;s&quot; more prosperous subjects survived the &quot;Revolution&quot; of 1919; the Weimar Republic, including the great hyperinflation of the early 20&#039;s; the Third Reich and its total collapse between 1945 and 1948.  Survived, to now be &quot;shared&quot; by all, including the &quot;lowliest&quot; of free citizen who may have acquired a taste for now no longer unaffordable sparkling wine of any kind. Had Charles Dickens lived a century later, he might have written &quot;A Tale of Two Navies and A Tax&quot;.</p>
<p>Taxes have long legs. Tough to outrun them.</p>
<p>Taxes have long lives. Tough to outlive them.</p>
<p>Taxes adapt to a changing body politic. Tough even to out-morph them. Some would say, &quot;impossible&quot;. I would tend to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: audrey Mississipp</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71231</link>
		<dc:creator>audrey Mississipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71231</guid>
		<description>Why not sell WAR bonds as was done in WWII? It would help OUR Country and American citizens rather than tax us to death. 
 
Of course, that would be too simple and not on their NWO agenda. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not sell WAR bonds as was done in WWII? It would help OUR Country and American citizens rather than tax us to death.</p>
<p>Of course, that would be too simple and not on their NWO agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stirling, Huntingdon</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71226</link>
		<dc:creator>Stirling, Huntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71226</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s becoming very clear that the government doesn&#039;t want the people to have any disposable income to use as they see fit (they want us to give it all to the government to make the decisions where to spend it.) Here&#039;s an idea... Let&#039;s have the politician&#039;s (with their 6 or 7 figure salaries) be the first to sacrafice their pay and lifestyles to show that they can spend their own money before that of the rest of us. So far it&#039;s just &quot;our&quot; money, not &quot;theirs&quot; as far as I can tell. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s becoming very clear that the government doesn&#039;t want the people to have any disposable income to use as they see fit (they want us to give it all to the government to make the decisions where to spend it.) Here&#039;s an idea&#8230; Let&#039;s have the politician&#039;s (with their 6 or 7 figure salaries) be the first to sacrafice their pay and lifestyles to show that they can spend their own money before that of the rest of us. So far it&#039;s just &quot;our&quot; money, not &quot;theirs&quot; as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sheahen, Hickor</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71218</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sheahen, Hickor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71218</guid>
		<description>Such a case as that of so-called &#8220;Progressives (Leftists)&#8221; such as Pelosi using the war in Afghanistan (and/or anywhere else) as an excuse for imposing and/or raising any tax, is yet another example of how it has absolutely nothing to do with how just or right anything is and everything to do with any excuse for another government elitist and statist so-called &quot;Progressive (Leftist)&quot; power and money-grab, in this case through their wanting to impose and/or raise any tax or taxes, or actually imposing and/or raising any tax or taxes; which has the effect, here in the real world, of being such an income reducing disincentive against all us private citizens, outside of government, who are the ones who actually do the creating, investing in, selling, and buying which provide the existence of the businesses and jobs which provide the goods, services, income, and, (though you wouldn&#039;t know it by the way the Left talks and acts), the tax revenues which government gets, that such creating, providing, and continuing the existence of businesses and jobs is thus driven downward; so then the bad things, including unemployment, go up, and, the way so-called &quot;Progressive (Leftist)&quot; politicians and their bureaucrats in the U.S. have made it, especially during more than 100 years now, that means that many more ways for them to make that many more people dependant upon them, as in government, and so also they &quot;just happen&quot; to assure themselves of a job in and/or for government with that much more government power, at the expense of the freedoms and power of the people.  
 
In short, any of Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and/or their Comrades, using the war in Afghanistan as an excuse for imposing and/or raising any tax or taxes, such as and especially now when there is more than enough government abuse, fraud, and waste to more than pay for the war in Afghanistan and elsewhere, is yet another example of the government elitist and statist so-called &#8220;Progressives (Leftists)&#8221; trying to vainly &quot;justify&quot; yet another of their power and money-grabs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a case as that of so-called &ldquo;Progressives (Leftists)&rdquo; such as Pelosi using the war in Afghanistan (and/or anywhere else) as an excuse for imposing and/or raising any tax, is yet another example of how it has absolutely nothing to do with how just or right anything is and everything to do with any excuse for another government elitist and statist so-called &quot;Progressive (Leftist)&quot; power and money-grab, in this case through their wanting to impose and/or raise any tax or taxes, or actually imposing and/or raising any tax or taxes; which has the effect, here in the real world, of being such an income reducing disincentive against all us private citizens, outside of government, who are the ones who actually do the creating, investing in, selling, and buying which provide the existence of the businesses and jobs which provide the goods, services, income, and, (though you wouldn&#039;t know it by the way the Left talks and acts), the tax revenues which government gets, that such creating, providing, and continuing the existence of businesses and jobs is thus driven downward; so then the bad things, including unemployment, go up, and, the way so-called &quot;Progressive (Leftist)&quot; politicians and their bureaucrats in the U.S. have made it, especially during more than 100 years now, that means that many more ways for them to make that many more people dependant upon them, as in government, and so also they &quot;just happen&quot; to assure themselves of a job in and/or for government with that much more government power, at the expense of the freedoms and power of the people. </p>
<p>In short, any of Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and/or their Comrades, using the war in Afghanistan as an excuse for imposing and/or raising any tax or taxes, such as and especially now when there is more than enough government abuse, fraud, and waste to more than pay for the war in Afghanistan and elsewhere, is yet another example of the government elitist and statist so-called &ldquo;Progressives (Leftists)&rdquo; trying to vainly &quot;justify&quot; yet another of their power and money-grabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Obama&#8217;s America, Our Heroes Are Put On Trial</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71160</link>
		<dc:creator>In Obama&#8217;s America, Our Heroes Are Put On Trial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71160</guid>
		<description>[...] Morning Bell: Victory In Afghanistan Is No Excuse For Raising Taxes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morning Bell: Victory In Afghanistan Is No Excuse For Raising Taxes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prevailer76AZ</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/morning-bell-victory-in-afghanistan-is-no-excuse-for-raising-taxes/#comment-71167</link>
		<dc:creator>Prevailer76AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20566#comment-71167</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it interesting that the administration doesn&#039;t bat an eye over a debt of trillions for all their busy work so far: the stimulus package, bailing out major financial entities, Cap and Trade, and even the Health Care Bill, yet when it comes to anything connected to the military, it suddenly becomes an issue of financial concern. Ms Nancy&#039;s stated priorities are positively askewed, as obviously are those of our president and his chosen abettors. One can&#039;t help but wonder at a president who has traveled more air miles than any other president in history and spent record amounts on his personal pleasures. He assumes an attitude of privilege while condemning the masses to certain poverty, and short changing those who serve by offering their very lives. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t it interesting that the administration doesn&#039;t bat an eye over a debt of trillions for all their busy work so far: the stimulus package, bailing out major financial entities, Cap and Trade, and even the Health Care Bill, yet when it comes to anything connected to the military, it suddenly becomes an issue of financial concern. Ms Nancy&#039;s stated priorities are positively askewed, as obviously are those of our president and his chosen abettors. One can&#039;t help but wonder at a president who has traveled more air miles than any other president in history and spent record amounts on his personal pleasures. He assumes an attitude of privilege while condemning the masses to certain poverty, and short changing those who serve by offering their very lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

