Comments on: Climate Change and the Rhetoric of Belief http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/climate-change-and-the-rhetoric-of-belief/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Bobbie Jay http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/climate-change-and-the-rhetoric-of-belief/#comment-71228 Bobbie Jay Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:20:22 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=20634#comment-71228 The only catastrophe is the brainwashing of the human mind! Resulting in the endless thieving of tax dollars and freedoms, for an endless, fictitious need. While Al Gore and GOVERNMENT get bigger paychecks, more programs and provide unproductive to reality, useless jobs...make-work, the people could employee themselves where they can actually use their intelligence. In the free market! Where innovation in a free country is rewarded by the people, and choice. NOT GOVERNMENT. Remove any man-made global warming mandates and let private business, mfg, commence and the people work for their right and duty to live independently! Is that asking too much? AND WHY? The only catastrophe is the brainwashing of the human mind! Resulting in the endless thieving of tax dollars and freedoms, for an endless, fictitious need.

While Al Gore and GOVERNMENT get bigger paychecks, more programs and provide unproductive to reality, useless jobs…make-work, the people could employee themselves where they can actually use their intelligence. In the free market! Where innovation in a free country is rewarded by the people, and choice. NOT GOVERNMENT.

Remove any man-made global warming mandates and let private business, mfg, commence and the people work for their right and duty to live independently! Is that asking too much? AND WHY?

]]> By: Roger S., Ma. http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/climate-change-and-the-rhetoric-of-belief/#comment-71220 Roger S., Ma. Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:51:58 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=20634#comment-71220 Thanks, Katie, for ultimate PROOF: proof that the world has gone finally and irretrievably "bonkers"! Neither belief in "haunted houses", nor belief in AGW, exceed significantly the LACK of "belief" in evolution by natural selection. Each of these tallies at about 35pct of all Americans. In other words, fully one third of our population, and not necessarily the same third, "believes" in a significant admixture of "Magic" to life on earth. That IS shocking! -- "Houston, we have a problem." Which part of "spaceship" don't we understand? No wonder the world is in such a mess, when laws, and in England even the courts, now support "magical thinking". The same court which stopped "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in classrooms because it contained too little proof of its contentions to be considered anything other than political drivel, now supports an employee's "right" to terrorize his employer with exactly the same drivel? Motto: one man's politics is another's philosophy. --The one is drivel, the other plain sense, both are the same?-- Oh, open wide the "pearly gates" for that scourge of mankind, subjective law! Arise all ye dead jurists of "standpoint epistemology"! Pray tell: how long must we yet wait for the next "auto da fé"? The 16th century has been a long time coming. Who's selling tickets? Got any left? What, they were left on the Moon? In 1969? Don't bet on it! Thanks, Katie, for ultimate PROOF: proof that the world has gone finally and irretrievably "bonkers"! Neither belief in "haunted houses", nor belief in AGW, exceed significantly the LACK of "belief" in evolution by natural selection. Each of these tallies at about 35pct of all Americans.

In other words, fully one third of our population, and not necessarily the same third, "believes" in a significant admixture of "Magic" to life on earth. That IS shocking! — "Houston, we have a problem." Which part of "spaceship" don't we understand?

No wonder the world is in such a mess, when laws, and in England even the courts, now support "magical thinking". The same court which stopped "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in classrooms because it contained too little proof of its contentions to be considered anything other than political drivel, now supports an employee's "right" to terrorize his employer with exactly the same drivel? Motto: one man's politics is another's philosophy. –The one is drivel, the other plain sense, both are the same?– Oh, open wide the "pearly gates" for that scourge of mankind, subjective law! Arise all ye dead jurists of "standpoint epistemology"! Pray tell: how long must we yet wait for the next "auto da fé"?

The 16th century has been a long time coming. Who's selling tickets? Got any left? What, they were left on the Moon? In 1969? Don't bet on it!

]]> By: Freedom of Speech, T http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/25/climate-change-and-the-rhetoric-of-belief/#comment-71163 Freedom of Speech, T Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:37:17 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=20634#comment-71163 The reason Bush did not "believe" in climate change is because there is no SIGNIFICANT climate change. It has been getting colder. The whistleblower emails verify what millions of us already knew. It is just a giant scam which has accumulated millions of zealots. Many of the "Scientists" couldn't name the types of clouds because they are not climatologists. The truth is coming out and even the President Obama was duped or was he? The reason Bush did not "believe" in climate change is because there is no SIGNIFICANT climate change. It has been getting colder.

The whistleblower emails verify what millions of us already knew. It is just a giant scam which has accumulated millions of zealots. Many of the "Scientists" couldn't name the types of clouds because they are not climatologists.

The truth is coming out and even the President Obama was duped or was he?

]]>