• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Senate Health Bill: Federal Micromanagement of Health Insurance

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) giant new health care bill contains the same provisions as the other House and Senate bills to establish Federal micromanagement of all private health insurance.

    Like the others, the Reid bill would subject all private health insurance — whether purchased from an insurance company by employer groups or individuals, or provided through an employer or union self-insured plan — to detailed Federal regulation.

    These so called “insurance reform” provisions amount to a de facto nationalization of health insurance and they would produce that effect regardless of whether or not Congress creates another, new government-run health insurance plan.

    Benefit Control. Of particular concern to patients should be that the detailed benefits in their health insurance coverage will soon be determined by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services. Last week, Americans got a foretaste of what Federal health benefit regulation means when the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force changed its recommendation for breast cancer screening (mammography) for women aged 40 to 50 from “B” (recommended) to “C” (not recommended).

    Normally, such recommendations would not create controversy as, until now, they have been merely suggestions to guide providers and health plans in making their own decisions for their patients or members. But under the proposed legislation they would take on the force of law, since the legislation will require all plans — starting in 2011 in the Reid bill — to provide coverage (with no patient co-pays) for, “items or services that have in effect a rating of ‘A’ or ‘B’ in the current recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force.”

    Thus, a decision by a, heretofore, obscure HHS Task Force to recommend a specific medical service would in the future carry the force of law, and would impose additional costs on insurers and employer health plans. Conversely, any decision by the Task Force to issue a “C” or “D” rating (not recommended) — as it did last week in the case of breast cancer screening — will be henceforth viewed by insurers and employers as a justification for discontinuing coverage.

    Cost Impact. Over time the more specific HHS gets in its benefit requirements — driving up the cost of coverage — the greater the incentive will be for insurers and employers to control those escalating costs by not covering anything that they aren’t absolutely required to cover by federal law.

    The eventual result will be that the only medical care paid for through private health insurance will be the specific, items and services required by federal regulations promulgated by HHS. At that point, Congress will have effectively nationalized the entire American health insurance system under the supervision of the Secretary of HHS — regardless of whether or not it also sets up yet another government health insurance program in the process.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    13 Responses to The Senate Health Bill: Federal Micromanagement of Health Insurance

    1. Pingback: New Mammogram Recs Spark Passions Across Spectrum – Blog Watch

    2. Pingback: The Senate Health Bill: Federal Micromanagement of Health Insurance « Conservative Policy News

    3. Pingback: A Tax-and Spend Bill of the Very Highest Order! Affordable Care Indeed! « American Elephants

    4. Evan says:

      Nice Site layout for your blog. I am looking forward to reading more from you. http://bit.ly/2Lsw39

    5. Gary J AZ says:

      Women, you are not alone. We can/will add prostate screening to these guidelines. According to the AZ Republic last spring "….Prostate(PSA) screenings are not reliable…" You would not believe how many of us are survivors. People ask "What are the symptoms?" I tell them there are not any. Only when it moves somewhere else. Bones, Lymph system, blood, testicles. Then it is too late. The new form of genocide. Let the cancer do it and save the costs and the Social Security payments!

    6. Bobbie Jay says:

      15 years ago, I knew one person in my life time that was diagnosed, and died from cancer. Prostate. 15 years to present, it's become unsurprising to hear. My sister just past. My other sister was just diagnosed, a friend of mine just passed, another friend, with cancer, developed a permanent mental disability from steroids, who is young but now resides in a nursing home. Quite a few others with cancer, I'm told in passing. hmm…

      Isn't it funny, not too long ago a spokesperson for some medical association claim they're coming close to a cure for cancer? Yet 100's maybe 1000's are diagnosed daily? Isn't it funny, they've implied the same thing about diabetes, and yet come out with costly conveniences to live with it? hmm…

      LET THE FREE MARKET WORK WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE! THEY'RE KILLING US! Many private insurances are backed by government! Government, where regulations, mandates, limitations are forced on the doctor and the patient.

    7. Pingback: Morning Bell: The Obamacare Rationing Threat To Your Mammograms | Conservative Principles Now

    8. Pingback: Get Equipped on What’s at Stake with ObamaCare | Conservative Principles Now

    9. Pingback: The Senate Health Bill: Federal Micromanagement of Health … PC just to Me

    10. Pingback: Obamacare in the Senate: First Week Amendments | Fix Health Care Policy

    11. Pingback: Obamacare in the Senate: First Week Amendments | Step Down Obama

    12. Pingback: The Reid Compromise Does Nothing to Improve A Very Bad Senate Health Bill | Fix Health Care Policy

    13. Pingback: The Reid Compromise Does Nothing to Improve A Very Bad Senate Health Bill | Conservative Principles Now

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×