<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Sen. Leahy Says No Need To Interrogate Osama bin Laden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/video-sen-leahy-says-no-need-to-interrogate-osama-bin-laden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/video-sen-leahy-says-no-need-to-interrogate-osama-bin-laden/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/video-sen-leahy-says-no-need-to-interrogate-osama-bin-laden/#comment-69803</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20243#comment-69803</guid>
		<description>Set-up for a future crisis...and of course catastrophe. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set-up for a future crisis&#8230;and of course catastrophe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan in York PA</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/video-sen-leahy-says-no-need-to-interrogate-osama-bin-laden/#comment-69783</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan in York PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20243#comment-69783</guid>
		<description>This is issue is moot, I am sure that OBL is not in custody because he is either being used by the CIA/NSA to derive new intel with his movements/contacts, or he is dead.   
 
and what, exactly would the BO administration use for interrogation techniques anyway, a cupcake induced sugar high, and feather tickles on his bare feet? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is issue is moot, I am sure that OBL is not in custody because he is either being used by the CIA/NSA to derive new intel with his movements/contacts, or he is dead.  </p>
<p>and what, exactly would the BO administration use for interrogation techniques anyway, a cupcake induced sugar high, and feather tickles on his bare feet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Miner Atlanta</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/video-sen-leahy-says-no-need-to-interrogate-osama-bin-laden/#comment-69778</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Miner Atlanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20243#comment-69778</guid>
		<description>Hey Mr Leahy, 
 Does the word treason mean anything to you? Why dont you and Murtha go for a beer....IN BAGDAD!!! And stay there you pinheads </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mr Leahy,</p>
<p> Does the word treason mean anything to you? Why dont you and Murtha go for a beer&#8230;.IN BAGDAD!!! And stay there you pinheads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiritof76</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/video-sen-leahy-says-no-need-to-interrogate-osama-bin-laden/#comment-69744</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritof76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=20243#comment-69744</guid>
		<description>We do have a terrorist case thrown out of our criminal court due to a technicality involving the FBI.  The case was against the home-grown terrorists, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn. 
Khalid Sheik Mohammed will more than likely be found not guilty because all the evidence against him will be inadmissible- was not properly arrested with reciting of Miranda rights, forced confessions, use of &quot;torture&quot;, etc. etc. 
Mr. Obama and Mr. Holder both claimed even before the trial, that he was guilty and would be sentenced to die.  Is this like the Stalin show trial where the outcome was already fixed before the trial.  How would that not prejudice the case? 
I am not even a lawyer and I can not see how the trail can result in anything but acquittal. 
How can Mr. Holder claim that KSM will still be incarcerated even if found not guilty?  How is that Constitutional? 
There is a different agenda at play here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do have a terrorist case thrown out of our criminal court due to a technicality involving the FBI.  The case was against the home-grown terrorists, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn.</p>
<p>Khalid Sheik Mohammed will more than likely be found not guilty because all the evidence against him will be inadmissible- was not properly arrested with reciting of Miranda rights, forced confessions, use of &quot;torture&quot;, etc. etc.</p>
<p>Mr. Obama and Mr. Holder both claimed even before the trial, that he was guilty and would be sentenced to die.  Is this like the Stalin show trial where the outcome was already fixed before the trial.  How would that not prejudice the case?</p>
<p>I am not even a lawyer and I can not see how the trail can result in anything but acquittal.</p>
<p>How can Mr. Holder claim that KSM will still be incarcerated even if found not guilty?  How is that Constitutional?</p>
<p>There is a different agenda at play here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

