The Senate Health Bill: Higher Taxes from Harry Reid
Posted November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm in Health Care
Print This Post
In order to pay for a massive health care bill (H.R. 3590), Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) creates a host of new taxes. These taxes will total $370.2 billion in the next ten years, and many of the taxes will start being collected in 2010, even as the economy continues to struggle.
The most shocking tax increase is a payroll tax increase that will permanently sever the link between the Medicare Payroll tax and its contributions to Medicare. This payroll tax increase of .5% on earnings above $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for joint couples will contribute money to the general fund for health care instead of directly for Medicare payments.
This change means that Medicare taxes are no longer solely dedicated to social insurance and safeguarding Medicare. Instead, Medicare payroll taxes will be used for other government programs. It is ironic, that the shift emerges from the liberals as they have long been worried about turning social insurance programs into welfare programs that redistribute wealth. The Reid payroll tax is a huge step down the road of using social insurance payroll taxes as regular taxes to transfer income.
Senator Reid also keeps the excise tax on high value of insurance companies. This tax is expected to be $150 billion and is very similar to the similar tax in the Senate Finance Committee, but at a higher threshold level.
Senator Reid also imposes a host of new taxes on the health insurance industry. These range from taxes on branded drug companies to the makers of medical devices. The effect of these new taxes will be to increase medical costs and premiums for individuals. These taxes do nothing but raise the cost of health care as the companies will pass on these tax increases to the consumers of health care.
Reid Taxes as calculated by the Joint Tax Committee:
- 40% Excise tax on High Value plans such as $8,500 for Individual and $23,000 for a couple. $149.1 billion in new taxes over the next ten years.
- 0.5% Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax Hike, for single earners over $200,000 and joint earners over $250,000. $53.8 billion in new taxes over the next ten years.
- Changes to Health Savings Accounts, Archer Medical Spending Accounts and Health Flexible Spending Accounts and Health Reimbursement Arrangements, $5 billion in new taxes.
- Cap Flexible Spending Accounts at $2500 in cafeteria plans from the current status of unlimited FSA, $14.6 billion.
- Increase Penalty for early non-qualified Health Savings Accounts Withdrawals from 10 to 20 Percent, $1.3 Billion.
- Tax on Branded Drugs: manufacturers and importers of branded drugs that will cost taxpayers $22.2 billion.
- Annual tax on the health insurers. $60.4 billion in new taxes over ten years.
- Tax on companies who manufacture or import medical devices that will generate $19.3 billion in new taxes over the next ten years.
- 0. 5% excise tax on cosmetic surgery. This is basically a new 5% federal sales tax on cosmetic surgeries and procedures. $5.8 Billion in new taxes over ten years.
- Increase the floor of the Medical Expenses Deduction from 7.5% of Adjusted Gross Income to 10%. The floor for seniors will be maintained at 7.5%. This means that the cost of being sick has increased, and sick taxpayers will pay $15.2 billion in new taxes in the next ten years.
- Eliminate the Deduction of Medicare Part D(prescription Drug Plan) generates $5.4 billion in new taxes over the next ten years.
- Cap salaries for all employees of health insurance companies at $500,000 by making any remuneration all of that not deductible for tax purposes. $.6 billion over ten years.
- Established mandates on employers of companies with more than fifty employees to provide health coverage or pay a fee, and requires individuals to maintain qualified health coverage or pay a fee. Companies would pay a penalty of $750 per employee if any employee obtained coverage through the insurance exchange. Full-time workers would have to accept company coverage unless company coverage would cost more than 9.8 percent when they could be on the government exchange, but companies would still face the $750 penalty yielding $36 billion over ten years.
9 Responses to “The Senate Health Bill: Higher Taxes from Harry Reid”
Rick, Norfolk, Va on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
It is naive to think that government run health care will provide better care for all at less cost. Anyone who has ever been involved in government can see this for the rhetoric that it is. We should be far more focused on our nation’s productivity and economic welfare and adding additional tax burden on the heart and soul of what remains of our economy is not the answer.
Rick Texas on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
All these extra taxes and contributions by taxpayers, just to insure to additional 12 million or so? This is ridiculous, if not socialist. I cannot believe the radical extremes this administration has exhibited over the last 10 or so months – the least of which is lying to eveybody, including the ones who voted for Obama.
And I don’t believe anything that comes out of the mouth of Obama, Pelosi or Reid (throw in Dodd, Holdren, and the rest) – an admistration like this one has NEVER been in this country, and I hope our great country will never see the likes of these renegades again. This group has absolutely no respect for the Founding Fathers or the Constitution – in fact, they have a great disdain for freedom.
CLIFF FREEMAN on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY NO ONE(CONSERVATIVES) ARE CHALLENGING THE HEALTH CARE BILL ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS. THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT GIVE OUR GOVERNMENT THE RIGHT TO FORCE THIS ON THE CITIZENS, AND A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLANGE COULD DELAY RATIFICATION BY CONGRESS, AND FORCE MORE OPEN AND TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE AND GIVE OUR CITIZENS ADDITIONAL TIME TO OBJECT TO THEIR APPROPRIATE REPRESENTITIVES. I FEEL AS A CITIZEN THAT THE CURRENT ADMINSTRATION HAS AND IS CONTINUING TO IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION ON SEVERAL ISSUES, SUCH AS THE APPOINTMENT OF CZARS, AND THE REGULATION OF COMPENSATION FOR PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEES.
Jim Peeke on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
11-19-09
Fox News
Discuss if you will the amount of ear mark costs given to get the votes from the house & senate to pass the health care package.
The cost of health care is not just the medical cost, it is also the cost of those ear marks.
Send me your report by e-mail. I probably won’t hear it.
Jim Peeke
Sam Barba IA on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
The cost of any social program the government has been involved with is always grossly under estimated.
David Banning on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
This is a job killer. Tax increases, pay limits and Medicare destroyer is the best that the Majority Leader can do? All of this backdoor methods to take more revenue and control over the insurance industry. All it does is make medical expenses more expensive with less tax incentitives to promote consumer health driven reform. This is the tipping point for government takeover of the health care delivery system. Congress put away your checkbook. This resembles nothing of the objectives of the Presidents reform.
Eric; St. Louis on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
As a small business owner and someone who makes over $250k, I would like to remind these boneheads how our system works. The more successful our businesses are, the more they generate in tax revenue. For the administration and its pawns to continue their socialist programs and choke the economy will only lead to one thing…….the fall of our great country. Don’t know about you but, I am very proud of being the world leader. Wouldn’t want to have it any other way but, it’s coming.
debbie in indiana on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
i am appalled at this administrations abuse of power i realize that most politicians seem to be untruthful looking out for their own interests but i think obama has a much more sinister reason ive never in my 61 years beleived that any president wanted to destroy this country and i pray that im wrong but he is sure headed in that direction
Dorie Pierce, California on November 19th, 2009 at 5:37pm said:
Well, looks like the thing to do is vote everybody out of house and senate, regardless of party. I know I am in 2010.