<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Status Quo on Abortion and Federal Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consistency on Life and Conscience &#124; The Foundry</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-303125</link>
		<dc:creator>Consistency on Life and Conscience &#124; The Foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 17:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-303125</guid>
		<description>[...] amendment governing the FEHBP is particularly significant because it represents the principle that the federal government should not provide subsidies in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] amendment governing the FEHBP is particularly significant because it represents the principle that the federal government should not provide subsidies in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAT Wrong on Stupak, Wrong on Life &#124; National Review Institute Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-96367</link>
		<dc:creator>LAT Wrong on Stupak, Wrong on Life &#124; National Review Institute Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-96367</guid>
		<description>[...] is exactly the status quo in the federally funded Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (the health care plan available [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is exactly the status quo in the federally funded Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (the health care plan available [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Few Standing Between Current Law and Tax Payer Funded Abortion &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-80343</link>
		<dc:creator>The Few Standing Between Current Law and Tax Payer Funded Abortion &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-80343</guid>
		<description>[...] in the promotion, administration and subsidization of plans that cover elective abortions. The long-standing current policy is that health insurance programs subsidized with federal money—including those for Congressional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the promotion, administration and subsidization of plans that cover elective abortions. The long-standing current policy is that health insurance programs subsidized with federal money—including those for Congressional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Few Standing Between Current Law and Tax Payer Funded Abortion &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-80143</link>
		<dc:creator>The Few Standing Between Current Law and Tax Payer Funded Abortion &#124; The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-80143</guid>
		<description>[...] in the promotion, administration and subsidization of plans that cover elective abortions. The long-standing current policy is that health insurance programs subsidized with federal money—including those for Congressional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the promotion, administration and subsidization of plans that cover elective abortions. The long-standing current policy is that health insurance programs subsidized with federal money—including those for Congressional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid Roils the Abortion Debate &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-78144</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid Roils the Abortion Debate &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-78144</guid>
		<description>[...] the current FEHBP policy prohibiting all subsidies for plans that cover elective abortion will be cu.... Federal involvement in the active management of plan options that include elective abortion and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the current FEHBP policy prohibiting all subsidies for plans that cover elective abortion will be cu&#8230;. Federal involvement in the active management of plan options that include elective abortion and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid Roils the Abortion Debate &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-77389</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid Roils the Abortion Debate &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-77389</guid>
		<description>[...] the current FEHBP policy prohibiting all subsidies for plans that cover elective abortion will be cu.... Federal involvement in the active management of plan options that include elective abortion and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the current FEHBP policy prohibiting all subsidies for plans that cover elective abortion will be cu&#8230;. Federal involvement in the active management of plan options that include elective abortion and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Three Senators Who Could Save You From Government-Run Health Care &#124; Conservative Principles Now</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-75616</link>
		<dc:creator>The Three Senators Who Could Save You From Government-Run Health Care &#124; Conservative Principles Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-75616</guid>
		<description>[...] Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) As we have thoroughly documented before, there are nearly two dozen abortion funding prohibitions in current federal law that reflect two basic principles: 1) that, except in situations involving the life of the mother, rape and incest, the federal government will not pay for or reimburse for abortions under federal programs like Medicaid; and 2) that, with the same exceptions listed above, the federal government will not subsidize insurance plans that offer coverage for abortion. This is why the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB), military insurance through TRICARE, and the Indian Heal.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) As we have thoroughly documented before, there are nearly two dozen abortion funding prohibitions in current federal law that reflect two basic principles: 1) that, except in situations involving the life of the mother, rape and incest, the federal government will not pay for or reimburse for abortions under federal programs like Medicaid; and 2) that, with the same exceptions listed above, the federal government will not subsidize insurance plans that offer coverage for abortion. This is why the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB), military insurance through TRICARE, and the Indian Heal&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Three Senators Who Could Save You From Government-Run Health Care &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-75457</link>
		<dc:creator>The Three Senators Who Could Save You From Government-Run Health Care &#124; Fix Health Care Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-75457</guid>
		<description>[...] Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) As we have thoroughly documented before, there are nearly two dozen abortion funding prohibitions in current federal law that reflect two basic principles: 1) that, except in situations involving the life of the mother, rape and incest, the federal government will not pay for or reimburse for abortions under federal programs like Medicaid; and 2) that, with the same exceptions listed above, the federal government will not subsidize insurance plans that offer coverage for abortion. This is why the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB), military insurance through TRICARE, and the Indian Heal.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) As we have thoroughly documented before, there are nearly two dozen abortion funding prohibitions in current federal law that reflect two basic principles: 1) that, except in situations involving the life of the mother, rape and incest, the federal government will not pay for or reimburse for abortions under federal programs like Medicaid; and 2) that, with the same exceptions listed above, the federal government will not subsidize insurance plans that offer coverage for abortion. This is why the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB), military insurance through TRICARE, and the Indian Heal&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USA Today Abortion Q&#38;A Leaves Out Key Answer &#124; National Review Institute Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/11/the-real-status-quo-on-abortion-and-federal-insurance/#comment-67776</link>
		<dc:creator>USA Today Abortion Q&#38;A Leaves Out Key Answer &#124; National Review Institute Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19686#comment-67776</guid>
		<description>[...] and even Indian tribes. So how is abortion treated in those plans. Former Congressman Ernest Istook reports: The FEHBP (Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan) provides the insurance for millions of federal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and even Indian tribes. So how is abortion treated in those plans. Former Congressman Ernest Istook reports: The FEHBP (Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan) provides the insurance for millions of federal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

