<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repealing the Death Tax Would Create 1.5 Million Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Petrillo, Mama</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-69198</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Petrillo, Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-69198</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that Bill Gates and Warren Buffet , two men that are worth approximately $ 100 billion dollars combined and plan to put their wealth into a charitable foundation without paying one dollar in estate taxes, both support the estate tax.  Clearly a new estate tax is needed so that the wealthy even if they have charitable purposes in mind, still contribute 15% of their wealth to the federal government and 5% to the state government upon their death so that there is a chance of balancing the federal budget deficit. Actually they support the estate tax for individuals and families that do not open a charitable foundation. So once again to tax the wealthiest 1000 families and or individuals in the United States and to move towards balancing our budget, place a non exempt charge of 20% on all estates in this country, with no exemptions for foundations and charities. It would be interesting to see what Sam Walton founder of WalMart actually paid in estate taxes, or did it simply go into a foundation for his children to inherit. At the time of his death the estate tax was 55%. Maybe President Bill Clinton signed an executive order helping with the estate tax nearing his death.  
The United States has a large deficit problem, and to correct this problem do not let the wealthy escape their tax obligations by simply opening up foundations where they must give 5% of their assets away a year meanwhile they are investing their assets to earn more then 5%, thereby keeping their wealth and political power.  The time for change is now! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that Bill Gates and Warren Buffet , two men that are worth approximately $ 100 billion dollars combined and plan to put their wealth into a charitable foundation without paying one dollar in estate taxes, both support the estate tax.  Clearly a new estate tax is needed so that the wealthy even if they have charitable purposes in mind, still contribute 15% of their wealth to the federal government and 5% to the state government upon their death so that there is a chance of balancing the federal budget deficit. Actually they support the estate tax for individuals and families that do not open a charitable foundation. So once again to tax the wealthiest 1000 families and or individuals in the United States and to move towards balancing our budget, place a non exempt charge of 20% on all estates in this country, with no exemptions for foundations and charities. It would be interesting to see what Sam Walton founder of WalMart actually paid in estate taxes, or did it simply go into a foundation for his children to inherit. At the time of his death the estate tax was 55%. Maybe President Bill Clinton signed an executive order helping with the estate tax nearing his death. </p>
<p>The United States has a large deficit problem, and to correct this problem do not let the wealthy escape their tax obligations by simply opening up foundations where they must give 5% of their assets away a year meanwhile they are investing their assets to earn more then 5%, thereby keeping their wealth and political power.  The time for change is now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack E Lohman</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67625</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack E Lohman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67625</guid>
		<description>Freedom, inheritances are the same as gift taxes, except one occurs before death and the other after. And yea, we revolted against oppressive taxation without representation, but today the special interests pay off the politicians to spend excessively, we pay taxes in return, and we, uh, suck it up.  
 
It is not big government that is pushing spending, it is big business, and they pay off our politicians to go along with it. They buy PORK and WASTE and we let the payola continue. We deserve every bit of taxation we get. Either get behind making our political system more honest by getting rid of the payola, or quit complaining. You are getting what you deserve. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom, inheritances are the same as gift taxes, except one occurs before death and the other after. And yea, we revolted against oppressive taxation without representation, but today the special interests pay off the politicians to spend excessively, we pay taxes in return, and we, uh, suck it up. </p>
<p>It is not big government that is pushing spending, it is big business, and they pay off our politicians to go along with it. They buy PORK and WASTE and we let the payola continue. We deserve every bit of taxation we get. Either get behind making our political system more honest by getting rid of the payola, or quit complaining. You are getting what you deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Delaware</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67574</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Delaware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67574</guid>
		<description>Da Dog,  
 
That was a brilliant account of what&#039;s going on today. I thank God for others who don&#039;t waolk around with their hands over their eyes and buy into all of the lies and deciet that we are being fed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Da Dog, </p>
<p>That was a brilliant account of what&#039;s going on today. I thank God for others who don&#039;t waolk around with their hands over their eyes and buy into all of the lies and deciet that we are being fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael, Las Vegas</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67570</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael, Las Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67570</guid>
		<description>For a real life story about the estate tax, watch this video: 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urvkfi134Ew&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urvkfi134Ew&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a real life story about the estate tax, watch this video:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urvkfi134Ew" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urvkfi134Ew</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Az</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67556</guid>
		<description>I will present you with the elitists point of veiw. Over the years we gave you the post office, Social security, Medicair, welfare, ect. And all we got in return was relected while you complained about our inept entitlements. So now we present you with what we like to call health care. In this bill if you manage to escape an abortion. You will be forced on penalty of imprisonment to buy our health insurance along with all other taxs we may levy upon you throughout your existance. Once you are no longer an asset to us we will deny health care until death occurs. At which time we will claim no less than 55% of any remaining assets. You like to call it a death tax. We like to call it atonement. 
  How&#039;s that hope and change working out for you? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will present you with the elitists point of veiw. Over the years we gave you the post office, Social security, Medicair, welfare, ect. And all we got in return was relected while you complained about our inept entitlements. So now we present you with what we like to call health care. In this bill if you manage to escape an abortion. You will be forced on penalty of imprisonment to buy our health insurance along with all other taxs we may levy upon you throughout your existance. Once you are no longer an asset to us we will deny health care until death occurs. At which time we will claim no less than 55% of any remaining assets. You like to call it a death tax. We like to call it atonement.</p>
<p>  How&#039;s that hope and change working out for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom of Speech, T</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67542</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom of Speech, T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67542</guid>
		<description>Dear Jack, 
 
The inheritance tax is a &quot;symbol&quot; of the giant tax fraud that is forced on the American people. There are many other ourageous taxes, fees, surcharges, and penalties. There has to be a limit on the &quot;power of the purse&quot;. Current events should show why.  
 
You state, &quot;But they should pay their fair share of taxes on it. I do not support zero taxes on inheritances that my kids did not work for.&quot; Fine, don&#039;t. 
 
This country was founded on a revolt against oppressive taxation without representation. 
 
George Washington warned us about the danger of political parties.  Founding Fathers were extremely concerned about corrupt big government ruling the people instead of vice versa. How prophetic is that? Obama was quoted as saying the &quot;so-called founding fathers&quot;. What does THAT mean? 
 
So, what do we do? Instead of using taxation in a limited role, it has exploded into a 40,000+ page series of documents no one entirely understands. On top of that, what kind of representation do we get? The PORK and WASTE is too numerous to mention. Entire regions of the US are shut down by environmentalists protecting &quot;endangered species&quot; (see no water in the Valley in California), when Earth has lost 70% of its species numerous times in history from catacylmic events. Wonder how those farmers are doing in the Valley? That&#039;s compassion for you. 
 
I say NO to any new taxation! In fact, they need to repeal thousands of pages of the tax code and live within a budget like the rest of us. Americans should DEMAND this. 
 
If YOU want your kids to pay taxes on money that YOU earned, then send a check to the IRS. 
 
Leave the rest of us alone. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jack,</p>
<p>The inheritance tax is a &quot;symbol&quot; of the giant tax fraud that is forced on the American people. There are many other ourageous taxes, fees, surcharges, and penalties. There has to be a limit on the &quot;power of the purse&quot;. Current events should show why. </p>
<p>You state, &quot;But they should pay their fair share of taxes on it. I do not support zero taxes on inheritances that my kids did not work for.&quot; Fine, don&#039;t.</p>
<p>This country was founded on a revolt against oppressive taxation without representation.</p>
<p>George Washington warned us about the danger of political parties.  Founding Fathers were extremely concerned about corrupt big government ruling the people instead of vice versa. How prophetic is that? Obama was quoted as saying the &quot;so-called founding fathers&quot;. What does THAT mean?</p>
<p>So, what do we do? Instead of using taxation in a limited role, it has exploded into a 40,000+ page series of documents no one entirely understands. On top of that, what kind of representation do we get? The PORK and WASTE is too numerous to mention. Entire regions of the US are shut down by environmentalists protecting &quot;endangered species&quot; (see no water in the Valley in California), when Earth has lost 70% of its species numerous times in history from catacylmic events. Wonder how those farmers are doing in the Valley? That&#039;s compassion for you.</p>
<p>I say NO to any new taxation! In fact, they need to repeal thousands of pages of the tax code and live within a budget like the rest of us. Americans should DEMAND this.</p>
<p>If YOU want your kids to pay taxes on money that YOU earned, then send a check to the IRS.</p>
<p>Leave the rest of us alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack E Lohman</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67538</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack E Lohman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67538</guid>
		<description>Da Dog, I recognize the value of small businessmen, having been one myself. And I did not support either of the Bush or Obama giveaways to the bankers and GE. I preferred a bailout of 100% of our businesses, which a Medicare-for-all system would have given us (to the tune of a 15% cut in the nation&#039;s wages). But some of that would have come back to us in taxes. Importantly, the Big Three make more cars in Canada than the US because healthcare costs $800 per employee per year there versus $6500 per year here.  
 
But guys, the insurance industry gave big cash dollars to retain the current system and create the &quot;deform&quot; that&#039;s coming. $46 million in campaign contributions and 1.5 times that amount from hospitals, physicians and pharma. 
 
How are you liking our privatized political system so far? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Da Dog, I recognize the value of small businessmen, having been one myself. And I did not support either of the Bush or Obama giveaways to the bankers and GE. I preferred a bailout of 100% of our businesses, which a Medicare-for-all system would have given us (to the tune of a 15% cut in the nation&#039;s wages). But some of that would have come back to us in taxes. Importantly, the Big Three make more cars in Canada than the US because healthcare costs $800 per employee per year there versus $6500 per year here. </p>
<p>But guys, the insurance industry gave big cash dollars to retain the current system and create the &quot;deform&quot; that&#039;s coming. $46 million in campaign contributions and 1.5 times that amount from hospitals, physicians and pharma.</p>
<p>How are you liking our privatized political system so far?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack E Lohman</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67526</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack E Lohman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67526</guid>
		<description>For those right-wingers unhappy with my views, I am generally a center-right republican. Voted for Bush twice and McCain last year. I spent 40 years in health care, the last 25 as owner and CEO of an independent cardiac monitoring lab with offices in four states, so I think I have a handle on the rewards of hard work and self-sufficiency. But thank you for your concern. 
 
I sold my company and retired 5 years ago, and yes, I&#8217;d like to leave my remaining assets to my kids. But they should pay their fair share of taxes on it. I do not support zero taxes on inheritances that my kids did not work for. They pay gift taxes and these are no different. 
 
I&#8217;m also one who remembers the &#8220;compassionate&#8221; part of conservatism. I support Work for Welfare and believe that nobody should get a free ride. But I also agree with the quote that &#8220;taxes are the price you pay for a democracy.&#8221; Without them we have Somalia or the wild west where they resolved issues with guns on the street. That&#8217;s not the system I want to live in. 
 
Importantly, I will not accept corrupt politicians or corrupt CEOs who got to the top on the backs of my kids and your kids. I would not tolerate an employee taking money from outsiders and giving away corporate assets in return. And likewise I do not accept politicians who take from the masses to give to their wealthy contributors. That is not the transfer of wealth I support. 
 
Jerry, if someone spent millions of their own money on an election, they are likely to lose to the publicly funded candidate. In the three states that have clean elections, 70% of their legislatures ran against moneyed candidates and won on the publicly funded system (AZ, MA, CT). 
 
To be against high taxes yet for the current moneyed political system that fuels them seems a bit contradictory, but what the hell, it takes all types. 
 
Bennet, politicians have increased the public debt because they were &#8220;paid&#8221; to increase the public debt!!! Don&#8217;t you get it? You and I want politicians to spend our money wisely, but the big campaign contributors want exactly the opposite. Who do you think is going to win? 
 
And J.S. and Peter, campaign finance reform matters if you want to decrease the taxes needed by the politicians to satisfy their funders. The inheritance tax is just another pot. And no, when I die my kids do not pay a death tax, they pay an inheritance tax. But only on that over the first $3-4 million. 
 
My blog is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://moneyedpoliticians.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://moneyedpoliticians.net&lt;/a&gt; &#8230; with a complete disclosure in &#8220;About&#8221; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those right-wingers unhappy with my views, I am generally a center-right republican. Voted for Bush twice and McCain last year. I spent 40 years in health care, the last 25 as owner and CEO of an independent cardiac monitoring lab with offices in four states, so I think I have a handle on the rewards of hard work and self-sufficiency. But thank you for your concern.</p>
<p>I sold my company and retired 5 years ago, and yes, I&rsquo;d like to leave my remaining assets to my kids. But they should pay their fair share of taxes on it. I do not support zero taxes on inheritances that my kids did not work for. They pay gift taxes and these are no different.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m also one who remembers the &ldquo;compassionate&rdquo; part of conservatism. I support Work for Welfare and believe that nobody should get a free ride. But I also agree with the quote that &ldquo;taxes are the price you pay for a democracy.&rdquo; Without them we have Somalia or the wild west where they resolved issues with guns on the street. That&rsquo;s not the system I want to live in.</p>
<p>Importantly, I will not accept corrupt politicians or corrupt CEOs who got to the top on the backs of my kids and your kids. I would not tolerate an employee taking money from outsiders and giving away corporate assets in return. And likewise I do not accept politicians who take from the masses to give to their wealthy contributors. That is not the transfer of wealth I support.</p>
<p>Jerry, if someone spent millions of their own money on an election, they are likely to lose to the publicly funded candidate. In the three states that have clean elections, 70% of their legislatures ran against moneyed candidates and won on the publicly funded system (AZ, MA, CT).</p>
<p>To be against high taxes yet for the current moneyed political system that fuels them seems a bit contradictory, but what the hell, it takes all types.</p>
<p>Bennet, politicians have increased the public debt because they were &ldquo;paid&rdquo; to increase the public debt!!! Don&rsquo;t you get it? You and I want politicians to spend our money wisely, but the big campaign contributors want exactly the opposite. Who do you think is going to win?</p>
<p>And J.S. and Peter, campaign finance reform matters if you want to decrease the taxes needed by the politicians to satisfy their funders. The inheritance tax is just another pot. And no, when I die my kids do not pay a death tax, they pay an inheritance tax. But only on that over the first $3-4 million.</p>
<p>My blog is at <a href="http://moneyedpoliticians.net" rel="nofollow">http://moneyedpoliticians.net</a> &hellip; with a complete disclosure in &ldquo;About&rdquo;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da Dog</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67521</link>
		<dc:creator>Da Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67521</guid>
		<description>Careful, Jack, your intellect, or lack thereof is showing. You propose increasing taxes on the rich. Who do you think provides jobs, Jack - the Congress of Fools and President Obimbo? It&#039;s the business owners who have taken the risks to become successful who provide the opportunity for others to WORK, Jack. But, I know real work isn&#039;t the goal of the followers of liberalism - it&#039;s handouts. I don&#039;t know who created the following and I gladly give credit to their efforts. Here&#039;s the liberal way, Jack. 
 
THE  ANT  AND THE  GRASSHOPPER 
 
OLD   VERSION:  The   ant works hard in the  withering heat all summer  long, building his house and laying up  supplies for the winter. 
 
The  grasshopper  thinks the  ant  is a fool  and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. 
 
Come  winter, the  ant  is warm and  well fed. 
 
The grasshopper  has no food  or shelter, so he dies out in the cold. 
 
MORAL   OF THE STORY:  Be   responsible for yourself 
 
MODERN   VERSION: 
 
The  ant   works  hard in the withering heat all summer  long, building his house and  laying up supplies for the winter. 
 
The   grasshopper   thinks the ant   is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. 
 
Come   winter, the shivering grasshopper   calls a press conference and demands to know why the  ant   should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and   starving. 
 
CBS,  NBC ,  PBS, CNN, and ABC  show up to provide pictures of  the shivering grasshopper   next to a video of the  ant   in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.  America   is stunned by the sharp contrast. 
 
How   can this be,  that in a country of such wealth,  this poor grasshopper   is allowed to suffer so? 
 
Kermit   the Frog  appears on Oprah   with the grasshopper   and everybody cries when they sing, &#039;It&#039;s Not Easy Being  Green.&#039; 
 
Acorn   stages a demonstration in front of the ant   &#039;s  house where the news stations film the group  singing,  &#039;We  shall overcome.&#039;   Rev.  Jeremiah Wright   then has the group kneel down to pray to God for the  grasshopper&#039;s   sake. 
 
Nancy  Pelosi &amp;  Harry Reid  exclaim in an interview with Larry   King  that the ant has gotten rich off the back  of the  grasshopper,   and both call for an immediate tax hike on the  ant   to make him pay his fair share. 
 
Finally, the  EEOC   drafts the Economic  Equity &amp;  Anti-Grasshopper Act  retroactive to the  beginning of the  summer. 
 
The   ant is  fined for failing to hire a proportionate  number of  green  bugs   and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is   confiscated by the Government   Green  Czar. 
 
The   story ends as we see the grasshopper   finishing up the last bits of the ants   food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the  ant&#039;s   old house, crumbles around him because he doesn&#039;t maintain  it. 
 
The  ant  has  disappeared in the snow. 
 
The grasshopper   is  found dead in a drug related incident and the  house, now abandoned, is  taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize  the once peaceful  neighborhood. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Jack, your intellect, or lack thereof is showing. You propose increasing taxes on the rich. Who do you think provides jobs, Jack &#8211; the Congress of Fools and President Obimbo? It&#039;s the business owners who have taken the risks to become successful who provide the opportunity for others to WORK, Jack. But, I know real work isn&#039;t the goal of the followers of liberalism &#8211; it&#039;s handouts. I don&#039;t know who created the following and I gladly give credit to their efforts. Here&#039;s the liberal way, Jack.</p>
<p>THE  ANT  AND THE  GRASSHOPPER</p>
<p>OLD   VERSION:  The   ant works hard in the  withering heat all summer  long, building his house and laying up  supplies for the winter.</p>
<p>The  grasshopper  thinks the  ant  is a fool  and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.</p>
<p>Come  winter, the  ant  is warm and  well fed.</p>
<p>The grasshopper  has no food  or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.</p>
<p>MORAL   OF THE STORY:  Be   responsible for yourself</p>
<p>MODERN   VERSION:</p>
<p>The  ant   works  hard in the withering heat all summer  long, building his house and  laying up supplies for the winter.</p>
<p>The   grasshopper   thinks the ant   is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.</p>
<p>Come   winter, the shivering grasshopper   calls a press conference and demands to know why the  ant   should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and   starving.</p>
<p>CBS,  NBC ,  PBS, CNN, and ABC  show up to provide pictures of  the shivering grasshopper   next to a video of the  ant   in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.  America   is stunned by the sharp contrast.</p>
<p>How   can this be,  that in a country of such wealth,  this poor grasshopper   is allowed to suffer so?</p>
<p>Kermit   the Frog  appears on Oprah   with the grasshopper   and everybody cries when they sing, &#039;It&#039;s Not Easy Being  Green.&#039;</p>
<p>Acorn   stages a demonstration in front of the ant   &#039;s  house where the news stations film the group  singing,  &#039;We  shall overcome.&#039;   Rev.  Jeremiah Wright   then has the group kneel down to pray to God for the  grasshopper&#039;s   sake.</p>
<p>Nancy  Pelosi &amp;  Harry Reid  exclaim in an interview with Larry   King  that the ant has gotten rich off the back  of the  grasshopper,   and both call for an immediate tax hike on the  ant   to make him pay his fair share.</p>
<p>Finally, the  EEOC   drafts the Economic  Equity &amp;  Anti-Grasshopper Act  retroactive to the  beginning of the  summer.</p>
<p>The   ant is  fined for failing to hire a proportionate  number of  green  bugs   and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is   confiscated by the Government   Green  Czar.</p>
<p>The   story ends as we see the grasshopper   finishing up the last bits of the ants   food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the  ant&#039;s   old house, crumbles around him because he doesn&#039;t maintain  it.</p>
<p>The  ant  has  disappeared in the snow.</p>
<p>The grasshopper   is  found dead in a drug related incident and the  house, now abandoned, is  taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize  the once peaceful  neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Asher</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/09/repealing-the-death-tax-would-create-15-million-jobs/#comment-67444</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=19493#comment-67444</guid>
		<description>I think Jack just changed the subject. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jack just changed the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

