• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Behind Closed Doors: The Obamacare Arm Twisting Begins

    The heat is happening behind closed doors as the U.S. House prepares for a Saturday showdown vote on health care. Access is everything. By keeping Members of Congress in Washington, D.C., this weekend, Democratic leaders keep them away from angry constituents back in their home states, where the Members normally would depart from Friday to Monday. (Note: The tactics aren’t different from what Republicans sometimes used when they held the majority.)

    The first step is to keep Congress in town. The second is to keep them monitored and available for whenever leaders want to summons them for backroom meetings—sometimes to discuss and sometimes to pressure and browbeat and offer deals. A “buddy system” is sometimes assigned so a fellow Congressman from the party’s whip team keeps tab on each undecided member’s whereabouts, their cell and other private phone numbers, the places they tend to hangout between votes, and similar information.

    Members don’t like to be found and pressured. As one speaker noted at Thursday’s “House Call” tea party event at the U.S. Capitol: “There may be some members hiding right now. They may be in the basement. They may be in the cafeteria, pretending they’re not a Congressman.”

    So special gatherings are created, not only to communicate but also to attract the reluctant to join their party’s herd. Then they can be culled out by party leaders for individual attention, much as a sheepdog picks out individual sheep from a flock.

    That’s one benefit of scheduling a group meeting with President Obama, as party leaders have set for Saturday. It’s also a reason for scheduling other votes on the House floor, to flush individuals out of hiding and work them over. It’s common for members to rush into the chamber, cast a vote, and try to rush out before they’re caught. So multiple votes are scheduled.

    It’s all part of the behind-the-scenes effort to whip crucial votes. It’s not unique to the health care vote. But it’s part of Congress that most people never see. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is taking a big risk with her self-imposed Saturday deadline. Her party has 258 House seats; she only needs 218 of them to support her.

    For months she told the media she had the votes. Recent events demonstrate that she didn’t then and still doesn’t now. Pelosi therefore emboldens internal Democrat opposition if she cannot deliver. There’s already talk that Saturday’s deadline will be missed. The problem getting her own party’s approval exposes significant rifts among Democrats. Once Pelosi expends energy on this all-out effort, many within her own party might deny her a second chance if she cannot win this weekend.

    Ernest Istook served 14 years as a U.S. Congressman, and is now a distinguished fellow at The Heritage Foundation

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Behind Closed Doors: The Obamacare Arm Twisting Begins

    1. Freedom of Speech TX says:

      We do need COWARDS as representatives of the people.

      We need representatives that will do what is best for the country. By now, it is "transparent" that Pelosi's health bill will ultimately break the bank. It will not increase the quality of Americans' health care. It will lead to rationing. It will lead to a single-payer system.

      It will not cover everybody now – eventually it will as amendments are slipped in. Then the whole rotten egg will burst and the actual price will be staggering.

      So, if ANY CONGRESSMEN OR WOMEN ARE HIDING AND CHECKING OUT THE HF – do what is right for America – VOTE NO.

      If you get threatened, go to the press and name names and statements. Better to lose a career as a self-serving political hack and walk away with respect and honor.

      You many be surprised by getting reelected…

    2. Freedom of Speech TX says:

      Correction: WE DO NOT NEED COWARDS AS REPRESENTATIVES.

      WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH OF THOSE…

    3. Dennis, Virginia says:

      This is another good reason for term limits. Serving your country as an elected representative should be limited and not allowed to become a "career". Re-election should not be a consideration when representing the will of the people that elected them. It would be hard to pressure someone who has no career interest in doing the job. Coupled with a paring down of the current "executive priveleges" of these folks like retirement, compensation, and medical care (which should be no better than the rest of Government service's Blue Cross and only while serving)we can hopefully bring back some acountability to the electorate. We have allowed the creation of a privledged class in a country founded on equality. It is time to correct that mistake.

    4. Pingback: Morning Bell: Who is the President Calling “Extremist?” | Fix Health Care Policy

    5. Pingback: House Democrat: Pelosi Plan Raises Taxes And Funds Abortion | Conservative Principles Now

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×