Comments on: Understanding Boxer’s Procedural Gambit http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Boxer’s Procedural Gambit Pushed Bill Out of Committee | Conservative Principles Now http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-67937 Boxer’s Procedural Gambit Pushed Bill Out of Committee | Conservative Principles Now Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:35:05 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-67937 [...] may be ready to ignore decades of committee precedent and report out the Kerry-Boxer bill. The procedural gambit gets complicated though, because committee rules prevent amendments from being considered without [...] [...] may be ready to ignore decades of committee precedent and report out the Kerry-Boxer bill. The procedural gambit gets complicated though, because committee rules prevent amendments from being considered without [...]

]]> By: The Cap and Trade Boycott Continues | Conservative Principles Now http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-67377 The Cap and Trade Boycott Continues | Conservative Principles Now Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:03:24 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-67377 [...] than use a procedural gambit to trounce the rights of the minority, Senator Boxer announced the committee would receive a [...] [...] than use a procedural gambit to trounce the rights of the minority, Senator Boxer announced the committee would receive a [...]

]]> By: Kerry-Boxer – Fifth Version Still Not the Charm | Conservative Principles Now http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-67373 Kerry-Boxer – Fifth Version Still Not the Charm | Conservative Principles Now Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:01:37 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-67373 [...] we discussed earlier, there is a need for transparency in this debate and a full understanding of the economic [...] [...] we discussed earlier, there is a need for transparency in this debate and a full understanding of the economic [...]

]]> By: Shopfloor » Blog Archive » Contact the Imperial EPA about its Power Grab on C02 Emissions http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-65666 Shopfloor » Blog Archive » Contact the Imperial EPA about its Power Grab on C02 Emissions Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:37:58 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-65666 [...] as the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee mucks around procedurally with the Kerry-Boxer bill, the Environmental Protection Agency is marching ahead with proposed regulations to restrict carbon [...] [...] as the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee mucks around procedurally with the Kerry-Boxer bill, the Environmental Protection Agency is marching ahead with proposed regulations to restrict carbon [...]

]]> By: Tax-alot http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-65715 Tax-alot Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:10:58 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-65715 Cap 'N Tax, terror of the high seas. Cap 'N Tax, terror of the high seas.

]]> By: Freedom of Speech TX http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-65695 Freedom of Speech TX Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:37:14 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-65695 Yes Ma'am. Please address me as Senator. I have worked hard for this position. Yes, you have. Yes Ma'am.

Please address me as Senator. I have worked hard for this position.

Yes, you have.

]]> By: Bill Lee, ArkLaTex a http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-65691 Bill Lee, ArkLaTex a Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:31:50 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-65691 Correction"All this for a theory that has not been proven to be true" Correction"All this for a theory that has not been proven to be true"

]]> By: Bill Lee, ArkLaTex a http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-65689 Bill Lee, ArkLaTex a Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:30:01 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-65689 Cap and Trade or the nickname, Cap and Tax is the most economically devasting bill to ever be proposed by Congress. This bill if enacted will ruin this country. The poor who struggle by will fail to survive, the middle class will be no more, and the rich will have a much lower style of life. Production of wealth by free market activities will grind to a slow pace. Life will never be the same again for America. All this for an unproven theory that has been proven to be true! We must move to stop this nonsense. Cap and Trade or the nickname, Cap and Tax is the most economically devasting bill to ever be proposed by Congress. This bill if enacted will ruin this country. The poor who struggle by will fail to survive, the middle class will be no more, and the rich will have a much lower style of life. Production of wealth by free market activities will grind to a slow pace.

Life will never be the same again for America.

All this for an unproven theory that has been proven to be true!

We must move to stop this nonsense.

]]> By: Leon, Durango, CO http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/03/understanding-boxer%e2%80%99s-procedural-gambit/#comment-65668 Leon, Durango, CO Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:41:43 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=18981#comment-65668 Look, the new Plutocratic 'think' is it is cheaper and easier to feed people than it is to kill them. The Democrat's final solution, the next holocaust is by lock down. What individual economic is "harmless" politically? That will be the new American norm. Graduated Income Tax will keep individuals in the harmless catagory. It is so sad to watch Boxer (and the gang) take over American Medicine with phony procedures. Isn't that also illegal? Regressive is such a kind word for Cap and Trade, so much worse than Income Tax, just give the Plutocrats all the money they want. That's the same kind of gambit as the Federal Reserve, it is THEFT, plain and simple. But let's not forget our History, how the half vast left wing conspiracy put in the Income Tax (graduated for 'social justice' HA!) Theft is justice! Doesn't that just kill you? The new theft (cap and trade) is even better than the Income Tax, completely underground if Nancy and Barbara Boxer get their way. Regressive is said of Income Tax, and that is such a kind word for something that is destructive of our Country in so many ways. It is the source of runaway Greed! See? The rich are never allowed to be secure. Instability is a crazy thing for a government to be installing in Economics! Not a tax collection system, the IRS, but a Control System. The monstrous Tax Code is political manipulation. The Constitution does not allow within the enumerated powers the Animal Farm that Obama intends. So the trick is, nobody can bring the Case to prove the IRS is Unconstitutional. Cap and Trade has to be unconstitutional, but likewise it will never see the light of day (the Supreme Court). The Income Tax abomination has never been challenged in Court! It is absolutely illegal, easy to see, a criminal tax system. God! It wastes the People's capital. It lets the government spy, list and track all its citizens by number, the 'dangerous' ones (that means you have a little money to be activist with) the IRS can get them four times a year. The Supreme Court (bound by oath (ha, ha)) has looked the other way for almost a hundred years. Don't they abuse their Oaths failing to take the test case? Oh, they will rule on something else but they will never rule on the Constitutionality of the Income Tax. Likewise, they will never Rule on the Constitutionality of Cap and Trade. Look, the new Plutocratic 'think' is it is cheaper and easier to feed people than it is to kill them. The Democrat's final solution, the next holocaust is by lock down. What individual economic is "harmless" politically? That will be the new American norm. Graduated Income Tax will keep individuals in the harmless catagory. It is so sad to watch Boxer (and the gang) take over American Medicine with phony procedures. Isn't that also illegal?

Regressive is such a kind word for Cap and Trade, so much worse than Income Tax, just give the Plutocrats all the money they want. That's the same kind of gambit as the Federal Reserve, it is THEFT, plain and simple. But let's not forget our History, how the half vast left wing conspiracy put in the Income Tax (graduated for 'social justice' HA!) Theft is justice! Doesn't that just kill you? The new theft (cap and trade) is even better than the Income Tax, completely underground if Nancy and Barbara Boxer get their way.

Regressive is said of Income Tax, and that is such a kind word for something that is destructive of our Country in so many ways. It is the source of runaway Greed! See? The rich are never allowed to be secure. Instability is a crazy thing for a government to be installing in Economics! Not a tax collection system, the IRS, but a Control System. The monstrous Tax Code is political manipulation. The Constitution does not allow within the enumerated powers the Animal Farm that Obama intends. So the trick is, nobody can bring the Case to prove the IRS is Unconstitutional. Cap and Trade has to be unconstitutional, but likewise it will never see the light of day (the Supreme Court).

The Income Tax abomination has never been challenged in Court! It is absolutely illegal, easy to see, a criminal tax system. God! It wastes the People's capital. It lets the government spy, list and track all its citizens by number, the 'dangerous' ones (that means you have a little money to be activist with) the IRS can get them four times a year. The Supreme Court (bound by oath (ha, ha)) has looked the other way for almost a hundred years. Don't they abuse their Oaths failing to take the test case? Oh, they will rule on something else but they will never rule on the Constitutionality of the Income Tax.

Likewise, they will never Rule on the Constitutionality of Cap and Trade.

]]>