Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


The House Health Care Bill: A $700 Billion Tax Hike

Posted October 29th, 2009 at 5:45pm in Health Care 6 Print This Post Print This Post

The New House Health Care Plan has several tax increases that will cost taxpayers $700 billion in the next ten years. Several of these taxes are new and were not in the earlier House bills.

The Surtax
The new Pelosi plan establishes a 5.4% surtax on joint filers with over $1 million in adjusted gross income or $500,000 for single filers. This is a single rate, which is different from the earlier House bills that had surtaxes at lower income levels. This surtax is not based on final adjusted gross income, but instead modified gross income. Thus the effective rate of the surtax is higher than just increasing marginal tax rates by 5.4%.

This surtax is also not indexed to inflation. This will cause more and more taxpayers to be hammered by the surtax even as their real income does not increase. This is one of the reasons that the Joint Tax Committee expects the cost of the surtax to more than double in year 10 of its estimate to $68.4 billion from $30.9 billion in 2011. The Joint Tax Committee estimates that taxpayers will be forced to pay $460.5 billion in higher taxes due to this provision. This is a larger tax increase than the 1993 Clinton income tax increase provisions that created a new tax bracket for high income taxpayers, increased the AMT, limited deductions and exemptions for high income earners.

Business Taxes
Businesses could pay a penalty of 8% on the average wage of their employees if they do not offer qualified health insurance. Small businesses with less than $500,000 in total payroll will be exempt from the business. Businesses with total payroll from $500-$750,000 will pay less than the full 8% depending on their total payroll size.

Business Rate Table
Does not exceed $500,000 ………………………….0 percent
Exceeds $500,000, but does not exceed $585,000 2 percent
Exceeds $585,000, but does not exceed $670,000 4 percent
Exceeds $670,000, but does not exceed $750,000 6 percent

Copying Baucus
The House bill copies the Baucus framework of having several small tax increases in an effort to raise additional income. For example, the House bill now also limits Flexible Spending Accounts to $2500 and limits the ability of FSA or HSAs to purchase goods by excluding over the counter drugs.

Here is a full list of the additional House tax increase items and their cost:
1. Health Savings Account Tax: Increases tax on health savings account funds not used for medical purposes from 10% to 20%. ($1.3 billion)
2. Flexible Spending Arrangement Cap: Caps contributions to flexible spending accounts at $2,500. ($13.3 billion/ ten years)
3. Medical Devices Excise Tax: Imposes 2.5% excise tax on sale of medical devices. ($20 billion/ ten years)
4. Self-Insured Health Fee: Imposes fee on insured and self insured health plans.
5. Itemized Deductions Definition: Conforms the definitions of medical expenses from employer-provide health insurance, merging flexible spending arrangements, health reimbursement arrangements, health savings accounts and archer MSAs to the definition of itemized deduction. ($5 billion/ ten years)
6. Medicare Part D: Eliminates deduction for expenses that can be allocated to the Medicare Part D subsidy. ($3 billion/ ten years)
7. Payments to Corporations: “Requires information reporting on payments to Corporations” ($17.1 billion/ ten years)
8. Worldwide Interest Allocation: Delays implementation of interest allocation. ($26.1 billion/ ten years)
9. Treaty Benefits Limit: Limits the treaty benefits for some deductible payments. ($7.5 billion/ ten years)
10. Economic Substance Payments: Codifies economic substance doctrine and imposes penalties for underpayments. ($5.7 billion/ ten years)

Tags: ,

6 Responses to “The House Health Care Bill: A $700 Billion Tax Hike”

  1. b nuckols Texas on at said:

    Absolutely designed to kill patient ownership of their health care, to run self insured and non-profit insurances out of business and to kill any hope of choice.

  2. Bill Smith on at said:

    Is the $1.3B figure in item 1 an annual figure or an aggregate over 10 years?

    Thanks.

  3. Mike Brasovan, Fort Worth, TX on at said:

    Is there anywhere we can get more information on Items 1 through 10 above? I understand some of them but the rest seem to have to to do with some arcane income tax rules. For Example – what are 9 and 10 talking about? What is the Economic Substance Doctrine? If nothing else, these kinds of games point us more towards the FairTax!

  4. Freedom of Speech TX on at said:

    The House Ways and Means Committee.

    We’ll find a way and we have the means…

    Not if they don’t run the committees.

    Vote intelligently in 2010!

  5. Change, Houston TX on at said:

    i understand the people with vested interests in the status quo screaming bloody hell about change. the ones i do not get are the misguided who think the elite conservatives have them in mind when they wail against Obama and the Democrats. It is always amusing to hear the people that would benefit from policy changes echo what rich and powerful conservatives rightfully advocate for themselves. i think folks get caught up in wanting to belong to the clique they aspire to be in.But they forget that the big shots are,at the end of the day, just trying to find more ways of fattening their deep pockets. They know how to shape the debate,and the aspiring “conservative” eats it up.

  6. Freedom of Speech TX on at said:

    Change Houston,

    Most of us, I believe, do not think that “elite conservatives have us in mind”.

    There is one point. We are going to do everything we can do to “screen” politicians and demand conservative values beginning with taxation, spending, and a balanced budget.

    If these people lie, then in two years in th House Elections, we need to get rid of them

    No one said democracy was easy. What would YOU have us do? Just give up? Just accept the same garbage from both sides?

    This old boy (and old girl) way of doing politics has got to be challenged before there is no Republic left.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.