• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Twenty Questions on Reid's Opt Out Plan

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced that he would bring to the Senate floor a bill that includes a new “public plan,” but with a provision allowing states to “opt-out.” In response to a reporter’s question, Reid said that states would have until 2014 to opt-out.

    Setting aside the debate over the merits of a “public option”,- a new government-run health plan to compete against private health plans- there are a number of additional questions about how such a state opt-out would work. Specifically:

    1. What process will a state have to follow if it wants to opt-out of the public plan?
    2. Will opting-out require an affirmative vote of the state’s legislature?
    3. Will an opt-out resolution approved by a state’s legislature need to also be approved by the state’s governor?
    4. In some states the legislature meets in a full-session only every other year. In keeping with the allowances given such states by Congress when it has enacted federal laws that required state action, will those states be given additional time beyond 2014 to decide if they want to opt-out?
    5. Can a state decision to opt-out be made through a ballot initiative or referendum?
    6. If the start date of the public plan is delayed — say, because of unanticipated implementation problems — will the deadline for state decisions be extended beyond 2014?
    7. If, after implementation, the government-run plan does not work well in a particular state — say, it has only limited provider participation or has high, Medicare level, rates of fraud — will the state have a second chance to opt out?
    8. If a state opts out, and wants to increase coverage and intensify competition through its own health insurance market reforms that it deems superior, will it be able to do so?
    9. What conditions will the federal government impose on a state that decides to opt-out?
    10. If a state chooses to opt-out of the public plan, will the federal government require it to establish or participate in an alternative arrangement or program? If so, what alternatives will the state be allowed to choose among?
    11. If a state permits the new government-run plan to operate within its boundaries, will the plan be subject to the state’s insurance laws, particularly those governing reserve requirements, solvency standards, rate reviews (to ensure premiums are sufficient to cover expected claims), market conduct (fair sales and marketing practices), or state rules governing coordination of benefits, subrogation of claims, third party liabilities, and Medicaid as payer of last resort?
    12. Will states have the authority to require the public plan to participate in state quality and transparency initiatives such as all-payer claims databases, health care price disclosure systems, health plan performance rating methodologies, state health IT standards, etc?
    13. Will the specific benefits and limitations of the government plan, including any coverage limitations, drug formularies or prior authorization requirements be finalized before a state must decide whether it wants to opt in or out?
    14. If provider participation in the plan is voluntary, will the list of participating providers in each state be publicly available before the state makes its decision?
    15. Will a state lose any direct federal funding if it decides to opt-out? If so, how much?
    16. Will a state’s residents lose eligibility for federal subsidies or tax benefits if the state opts-out? If so, which ones?
    17. What if a state initially opts out but then wants in later (after 2014), will it then be allowed to opt-in?
    18. If a state opts out of the public plan, will the citizens of that state still be required to pay the requisite federal taxes that would subsidize the citizens of other states?
    19. Why won’t a state be allowed to opt-out after 2014?
    20. Besides the public plan, what other provisions of the legislation will a state be able to opt-out of? The Medicaid expansion? The new federal insurance regulations?

    Co-authored by Dennis Smith.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to Twenty Questions on Reid's Opt Out Plan

    1. Ozzy6900, CT says:

      The whole Q&A is moot!

      1. Even if States can opt out, Citizens will still have to pay the taxes and subsidize the rest of the States that decide to go with the Government plan. You DO NOT opt out AND get out of paying "your fair share".

      2. The will be NO COMPETITION! Private Insurance must turn a profit or it ceases to exist as a business. The Government DOES NOT need to turn a profit and therefore will squeeze out the Private Sector.

      Please! Someone prove me wrong!

    2. Daniel Z, New Orlean says:

      Ok, i will prove you wrong. You are basing competition on only one factor (price) and ignoring the other factors that come into play for competition (like quantity and quality of service).

      If the private insurance companies provide a superior product as compared to the public option, MANY people will likely choose to remain on their private plans and the only people who are likely to choose the public option are those who would be financially limited from purchasing the more expensive plans (i.e. those people who are currently uninsured).

      And I believe that it is a typical conservative argument that private business will tend to be superior to government run entities, right?

      • Conn Carroll Conn Carroll says:

        Daniel Z-
        You're forgetting that the government will both subsidize the government run plan and tilt the regulatory environment in their favor. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did not gain an 80% market share in mortgage securitization by merit.

    3. Gary, CA says:

      The reason why I will always be unalterably opposed to direct government control of any service or industry whether it be health care or energy or anything else can be seen in the country's exploding debt burden. Politicians seem incapable of resisting the pressure to promise to "give" favors to their electorates in their quests to to obtain and retain their offices. They can't even manage to pay for the programs which already exist such as Medicare and Medicaid. On the current trajectory of the nation's finances, it appears that a time of economic reckoning and unfavorable judgment is fast approaching.

    4. Freedom of Speech TX says:

      Dear Daniel Z, New Orleans,

      After what you have seen since January 20, 2009, do you REALLY believe that government will allow private enterprise to flourish?

      I could tick off dozens of advocates who want a government run health care system, including BHO.

      If you want government run health care, fine say it!

      But trying to justify the opt out is like signing up Mickey Mouse as a registered voter.

    5. Pingback: Twenty Questions for Harry Reid’s Opt Out Healthcare Plan | EVERY THOUGHT CAPTIVE

    6. Pingback: Don’t be suckers: Twenty Questions on Reid’s Opt Out Plan « Eternity Matters

    7. Len Barend Henderson says:

      Each state gets tax dollars from insurance companies called a premium tx. In Nevada the state receives 31/2% of all premiums collected and that amounts to $270,000,000 annually. If we have a public option and don't get the premium tax dollars from the insurance companies; how do we replace that $270,000,000? I guess we will have to implement a personal income tax. That will really go over well with Nevadans. We are in a lose, lose situation unless we stop Congress in their tracks.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.