<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Support for ObamaCare Collapses under the Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/27/pollsters-public-support-for-obamacare-collapses-under-the-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/27/pollsters-public-support-for-obamacare-collapses-under-the-facts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom of Speech TX</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/27/pollsters-public-support-for-obamacare-collapses-under-the-facts/#comment-64520</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom of Speech TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=18167#comment-64520</guid>
		<description>&quot;...serious violations of America&#8217;s core values: individual choice, personal responsibility and rewards for hard work.&quot; 
 
To the fanatic liberal there is a much different definition: 
 
1) selfishness (how dare you exercise individual choice when others may not agree with your choices) 
 
2) no one is responsible (for a variety of sociological reasons) 
 
3) no one should get more than a fair share (the fair share to be determined by an ever-increasing tyrannical socialist government). 
 
There is one way out.  Join the &quot;Party&quot; and foster the growth of the movement. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230;serious violations of America&rsquo;s core values: individual choice, personal responsibility and rewards for hard work.&quot;</p>
<p>To the fanatic liberal there is a much different definition:</p>
<p>1) selfishness (how dare you exercise individual choice when others may not agree with your choices)</p>
<p>2) no one is responsible (for a variety of sociological reasons)</p>
<p>3) no one should get more than a fair share (the fair share to be determined by an ever-increasing tyrannical socialist government).</p>
<p>There is one way out.  Join the &quot;Party&quot; and foster the growth of the movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/27/pollsters-public-support-for-obamacare-collapses-under-the-facts/#comment-64277</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=18167#comment-64277</guid>
		<description>This government plan of the president&#039;s is anything but moral! 
  
Those behind the presidents plan to &quot;reform&quot; are just as corrupt as he. What is moral, Mr. president, is freedom and with that freedom, choice. People can&#039;t be free unless they&#039;re self reliant. Without your &quot;feel sorry for me&quot; programs, people will become self-reliant. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This government plan of the president&#039;s is anything but moral!</p>
<p>Those behind the presidents plan to &quot;reform&quot; are just as corrupt as he. What is moral, Mr. president, is freedom and with that freedom, choice. People can&#039;t be free unless they&#039;re self reliant. Without your &quot;feel sorry for me&quot; programs, people will become self-reliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Anfinrud, Bell</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/27/pollsters-public-support-for-obamacare-collapses-under-the-facts/#comment-64230</link>
		<dc:creator>David Anfinrud, Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=18167#comment-64230</guid>
		<description>It is so true that once people understand what really is in the bills, the opposition will grow even more.    
  The fines against doctors for not telling patients of investments they have in running thier own lab.  Interesting idea that doctors would run tests to make more money. And yes there may be a small minority of Doctors that run unnecessary tests to make a few extra dollars.  Yet no attempt to do tort reform.  Fine Doctors but no accountabiltiy for lawyers.  I guess lawyers have a right to keep up filing lawsuit after lawsuit. Which in my opinion is one way to cut medical costs. Limit the pain and suffering.  Too many people see it as a lottery that they can win big bucks from doctors. Yet the lawyers take home the lions share of the money. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so true that once people understand what really is in the bills, the opposition will grow even more.   </p>
<p>  The fines against doctors for not telling patients of investments they have in running thier own lab.  Interesting idea that doctors would run tests to make more money. And yes there may be a small minority of Doctors that run unnecessary tests to make a few extra dollars.  Yet no attempt to do tort reform.  Fine Doctors but no accountabiltiy for lawyers.  I guess lawyers have a right to keep up filing lawsuit after lawsuit. Which in my opinion is one way to cut medical costs. Limit the pain and suffering.  Too many people see it as a lottery that they can win big bucks from doctors. Yet the lawyers take home the lions share of the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

