- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Cap and Trade: A $3.6 Trillion Gas Tax

Posted By Nicolas Loris On October 21, 2009 @ 3:00 pm In Energy | Comments Disabled

Here in Washington, people are discussing two things: Jim Zorn’s job security as the Washington Redskins’ head coach and health care, in that order. But there’s a $3.6 trillion gas tax on the table that already passed the House and is making its way through the Senate, and cap and trade has Americans all over the country concerned. The $3.6 trillion gas tax figure, which includes gasoline and diesel gas, comes from a new report [1]from Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) and Kit Bond (R-MO) on the effects of climate change legislation. And the energy tax has rippling economic effects, as Senators Hutchison and Bond explain [2]in their Washington Times op-ed:

Americans will be double-hit by the gas tax when it raises the costs of goods and services such as groceries and utilities they must continue to purchase. Energy costs are among businesses’ top operational expenses already. While companies face a variety of energy expenses, ranging from heating and cooling their work space to powering equipment and lighting, operating their vehicles is the most costly. Every company, from the small-town local florist to a package delivery service with nationwide operations, will be hard hit. In order for these businesses to withstand the heavier tax burden and to remain profitable, they will be forced to pass these energy cost increases along to consumers through higher prices.”

Some industries are more energy-intensive than others, and  farmers and ranchers are hit particularly hard. Heritage Senior Policy Analyst Ben Lieberman writes [3], “In addition to higher diesel fuel and electricity costs, prices for natural gas-derived fertilizers and other chemicals will also rise. Everything else affecting agriculture, from the cost of constructing farm buildings to the price of tractors and other farm equipment, will also go up.”

According to the Hutchison-Bond report, U.S. farmers and ranchers will incur higher fuel costs of $550 million in 2020. That figure will jump to $1.65 billion by 2050. According to The Heritage Foundation’s cap and trade analysis [3], farm profits are expected to decline by 28 percent in 2012 and will be an average 57 percent lower from 2012-2035. Congress is attempting to buy the farm vote by touting them as the beneficiaries of a carbon offset program because farmers can use cleaner technology, reduce nitrous oxide emissions, or simply not grow crops. However, the revenue gained from offset revenue will pale in comparison [4]to lost income from cap and trade.

Economic gains and environmental improvements aren’t mutually exclusive goals; in fact, they often go hand-in-hand. Hutchison and Bond say [2], “We can improve the environment and economy through American ingenuity and technological advancement, not with taxes and mandates that increase costs and burden American families and businesses.”

Instead, cap and trade significantly reduces the amount of resources the private sector can invest in newer, cleaner technology.

The full report is available here [1].


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/21/cap-and-trade-a-36-trillion-gas-tax/

URLs in this post:

[1] new report : http://hutchison.senate.gov/resources/HutchisonBondGasTaxReport.pdf

[2] explain : http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/21/democrats-hidden-gas-tax/print/

[3] writes: http://www.heritage.org/research/energyandenvironment/wm2553.cfm

[4] will pale in comparison : http://www.foundry.org/2009/06/22/carbon-offset-program-won%E2%80%99t-offset-farmers%E2%80%99-lost-income-from-cap-and-trade/

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.