Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


What Are We Incentivizing Exactly?

Posted October 19th, 2009 at 11:34am in American Leadership 3 Print This Post Print This Post

It seems that every week the administration tries to find a new excuse cut and run in Afghanistan. This week the line is that without a stable government and a clear winner in the elections sending more troops to the country would be unwise. On the other hand, Secretary Clinton is about ready to roll out a new strategy on the Sudan that calls for greater US engagement with Khartoum –offering the its leaders “incentives” for good behavior.

So apparently in the Obama era, US foreign policy means being overly cautious when engaging with fledgling democracies but embracing dictatorships that practice genocide.

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “What Are We Incentivizing Exactly?”

  1. Freedom of Speech TX on at said:

    INCENTIVES FOR “GOOD BEHAVIOR”???

    The Clinton Administration through Secretary of State Madeline Albright tried this with N. Korea – look where we are at now.

    INCENTIVES = MONEY AND/OR FOOD WHICH COST MONEY.

    We are going to get taxed into oblivion in every possible way and we’re going to give “incentives” to Sudan?

    When are our supposed experts going to study history and understand that an agreement with a non-believer is not worth the paper it is written on?

    Don’t take my word, study history.

  2. Bobbie Jay on at said:

    without a stable government and a clear winner in the elections sending more troops to the country would be unwise?…..huh? doesn’t the military go to protect the people from government’s of no stability? This seems like a definite, clear reason for military TO GO IN! The government members excuses are infantile and dangerous.

  3. Todd, Iraq on at said:

    Americans will have to suck up yet another tax after another tax and so on. How are we ever going to pay for any of this, healthcare, bailouts, two wars, foreign aide, education reform and so on. We are more than 11+ Trillion in debt and that’s just for starters. The military is stretched so thin thanks to another Dumbocrat Bill Clinton and Obama’s answer is smoke and mirrors. Look at his right hand while he rips you off with his left. By the way he’s left handed so any bill he signs will be with his left hand. (haha) Anyway, the old adage “our children will be paying for it” is out the window. Now it’s our children’s great grand children’s children will still be paying for all of this nonsense. Wake America if we don’t start doing something now and “Change” in 2010/2012 it will be to late.

    Just A Point of View

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.