Comments on: Iranian Official Promises a Diplomatic Slowdown and Gloats: “Time is on our side” http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/iranian-official-promises-a-diplomatic-slowdown-and-gloats-%e2%80%9ctime-is-on-our-side%e2%80%9d/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Iran’s Shaky and Deceptive Nuclear Deal | Conservative Principles Now http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/iranian-official-promises-a-diplomatic-slowdown-and-gloats-%e2%80%9ctime-is-on-our-side%e2%80%9d/#comment-63775 Iran’s Shaky and Deceptive Nuclear Deal | Conservative Principles Now Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:52:48 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=17340#comment-63775 [...] enrichment plant at Qom.  Before the latest round of talks, a senior Iranian official gloated that “Time is on our side” and that Iran would send junior officials who did not have the authority to make concessions to the [...] [...] enrichment plant at Qom.  Before the latest round of talks, a senior Iranian official gloated that “Time is on our side” and that Iran would send junior officials who did not have the authority to make concessions to the [...]

]]> By: Iran’s Nuclear Poker | Conservative Principles Now http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/iranian-official-promises-a-diplomatic-slowdown-and-gloats-%e2%80%9ctime-is-on-our-side%e2%80%9d/#comment-62818 Iran’s Nuclear Poker | Conservative Principles Now Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:56:01 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=17340#comment-62818 [...] to the talks adds fuel to the speculation that Iran might be using the talks to play for time. Reuters reported last week that Iranian officials admitted as [...] [...] to the talks adds fuel to the speculation that Iran might be using the talks to play for time. Reuters reported last week that Iranian officials admitted as [...]

]]> By: Freedom of Speech TX http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/iranian-official-promises-a-diplomatic-slowdown-and-gloats-%e2%80%9ctime-is-on-our-side%e2%80%9d/#comment-62161 Freedom of Speech TX Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:26:37 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=17340#comment-62161 What did ANYONE expect from the Iranians? They are the primary supporters of terrorist groups. The ARE a terrorist regime. AFTER they obtain nucs - we'll join the impotent UN and "condemn" Iran. Meanwhile, thanks Russia, thanks China, and thanks UN. Any bloodshed coming from this Regime will be YOUR fault. What did ANYONE expect from the Iranians?

They are the primary supporters of terrorist groups. The ARE a terrorist regime.

AFTER they obtain nucs – we'll join the impotent UN and "condemn" Iran.

Meanwhile, thanks Russia, thanks China, and thanks UN. Any bloodshed coming from this Regime will be YOUR fault.

]]> By: Leon, Durango, CO http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/iranian-official-promises-a-diplomatic-slowdown-and-gloats-%e2%80%9ctime-is-on-our-side%e2%80%9d/#comment-62151 Leon, Durango, CO Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:55:53 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=17340#comment-62151 Phillips has put his finger on a specific that is lost in the discussion because nobody really understands the process of enriching uranium. If it weren't enough proof that Iran built the new enrichment site, the fact that they have conned the Europeans into cleaning up the contaminants ought to give the Israelis proof positive. Recall how Bush gave Israel the Bunker Busters a few years ago. By now they ought to have fitted them with nukes. I thought they would have attacked Iran's nuclear program before Obama took office. Now their situation is dire, Americans in Iraq probably will shoot down Israeli planes on their way to Iran. Democrats love to crap all over our friends and support our enemies, they've done it for years. Rob Emanuel won't want to waste the coming Iran Crisis, either. I figure Obama will press a losing strategy in Afghanistan so as to embarrass our military and give the Left more anti-military press. If we go bombing the Afghans with drones just think of all the civilian casualties that will produce. Code Pink loves Obama's new 'strategy' (see, it is really calumny) because it will eviscerate our Military in the end. You'd think Obama want Iran to have the bomb. What is one American city? There are plenty more where that came from. And gosh! What a useful crisis that would be! Phillips has put his finger on a specific that is lost in the discussion because nobody really understands the process of enriching uranium. If it weren't enough proof that Iran built the new enrichment site, the fact that they have conned the Europeans into cleaning up the contaminants ought to give the Israelis proof positive.

Recall how Bush gave Israel the Bunker Busters a few years ago. By now they ought to have fitted them with nukes. I thought they would have attacked Iran's nuclear program before Obama took office. Now their situation is dire, Americans in Iraq probably will shoot down Israeli planes on their way to Iran. Democrats love to crap all over our friends and support our enemies, they've done it for years. Rob Emanuel won't want to waste the coming Iran Crisis, either.

I figure Obama will press a losing strategy in Afghanistan so as to embarrass our military and give the Left more anti-military press. If we go bombing the Afghans with drones just think of all the civilian casualties that will produce. Code Pink loves Obama's new 'strategy' (see, it is really calumny) because it will eviscerate our Military in the end.

You'd think Obama want Iran to have the bomb. What is one American city? There are plenty more where that came from. And gosh! What a useful crisis that would be!

]]> By: Patrick Scullin, Atl http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/iranian-official-promises-a-diplomatic-slowdown-and-gloats-%e2%80%9ctime-is-on-our-side%e2%80%9d/#comment-62058 Patrick Scullin, Atl Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:49:56 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=17340#comment-62058 No wonder Gadhafi trashed Ahmadinejad at U.N. Read the funny story @ <a href="http://bit.ly/15Wtzv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/15Wtzv</a> No wonder Gadhafi trashed Ahmadinejad at U.N. Read the funny story @ http://bit.ly/15Wtzv

]]>