- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Did You Want More Spending with VAT?
Posted By Conn Carroll On October 14, 2009 @ 11:52 am In Economics | Comments Disabled
P.J. O’Rourke once quipped  about spending in Washington: “The budget grows because, like zygotes and suburban lawns, it was designed to do nothing else.” To help pay for their addiction to more spending, the left is now calling for a value-added tax  or VAT.
Cato Senior Fellow Dan Mitchell , in conjunction with the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation , has produced a video conclusively showing that the VAT will do nothing to stop deficits since governments that have adopted VATs have a proven track record of only raising spending even further after they pass. Watch:
Heritage’s own Curtis Dubay wrote on the VAT  this July:
A VAT piled on top of current income and payroll taxes would suffer from the following additional problems:
Hidden Tax Increase. Sound tax policy requires that taxes be transparent to taxpayers. But taxpayers will not see the portion of the VAT paid by businesses unless Congress requires that businesses show the full VAT paid on receipts. Even then, however, taxpayers could be unaware of the total amount they pay because they are unlikely to keep their receipts and add up the total annually.
Economic Distortion. Taxes impose a cost on society above their explicit price because they reduce economic efficiency. Economists generally agree that VATs are more efficient than most of the taxes currently imposed on U.S. taxpayers. But that is only if they apply to all goods and services in an economy.
Due to political considerations, a VAT in addition to current taxes would likely exempt politically sensitive items like food, clothing, health care, and housing. This would drive the tax rate higher to achieve the same amount of revenue and impose new economic distortions. Industries that get an exemption will be more profitable, compared to taxable industries, than they would have been without the tax. This means more capital will flow to these industries. This will lower economic well-being because capital will not flow to its most efficient market-determined use.
More Economic Power to Washington. A VAT not levied on all goods and services would give Congress even more power over the economy. Industries would lobby heavily for exemptions from the VAT for the economic benefits described above. This would give Congress an even larger roll in picking winners and losers in the marketplace. Success would depend less on ingenuity
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/14/did-you-want-more-spending-with-vat/
URLs in this post:
 once quipped: http://books.google.com/books?id=bdCuBxhAkPEC&dq=parliament+of+whores&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=-PDVSvLpGsatlAeHsrSdCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=lawns&f=false
 the left is now calling for a value-added tax: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125426937758851077.html
 Dan Mitchell: http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/10/14/a-tax-that-would-finance-the-road-to-serfdom/
 Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation: http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/
 VAT: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/wm2532.cfm
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.