The Heritage Foundation - Leadership for America

The Foundry

Morning Bell: The Nobel Intentions Prize

As fellow Americans we always take pride in the achievements and awards of our compatriots. Although we congratulate President Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize today, he should accept the award on behalf of the American people for all our many sacrifices to make the world a better place.

Everyone recognizes, however, that the Nobel Committee awarded the prize to President Obama on the basis of hope for the future rather than achievements of the past. The politicization of this award saddens us when dissident leaders in China, Zimbabwe, Cuba and other dictatorships are passed over despite substantial achievements and not just hope for things to come.

More recently, former President Jimmy Carter won the award in 2002, and former Vice President Al Gore won it in 2007 for his environmental activism. It is clear to everyone that in recent years, the Nobel Prize has taken on a form of a political football that Europeans are able to lob into U.S. domestic politics when they desire to.

President Obama has built high expectations for himself since he began his campaign in 2007. He was going to turn around Afghanistan, the “good war.” He was going to restore America’s leadership role internationally, and deliver global consensus on issues as weighty as nuclear arms or universal emissions standards. So far, Obama  has been given little time to show results to match this “promise.”

While some nations  have embraced him,  former allies like Poland, the Czech Republic and others have condemned his policies. While he has spoken of a nuclear free world, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called this vision “naïve.” While he has delivered speeches looking to bridge the Muslim and western worlds, he has also failed to recognize that Muslim women and men are fighting against a Taliban intent on oppression, poverty and terrorism.

The Nobel Peace Prize is not the Nobel Intentions Prize. Past winners have risked life, freedom and their families to deliver world change. Former Polish President Lech Walesa led the Solidarity movement to free Poland from brutal Russian oppression. Mother Teresa was given the award after decades spent saving children from famine. Begin and Sadat in 1978  had made a giant leap forward in Middle East security, bridging the gap between Israel and Egypt.

The Nobel committee should have given President Obama the opportunity to meet these weighty expectations rather than diminish past achievements with a public relations award. However, the Nobel organization is a private one. And it has every right to give this award to whomever it  chooses. The real measure of success for President Obama will be how well he serves the American people, safeguards our sovereignty and keeps the nation secure, free and prosperous.

Quick Hits:

  • Author: Rory Cooper
  • Interact: Sphere
  • Share This
  • Print This Post

83 Comments

October 9, 2009 Worldbfree4me writes:

Leave it to the GOP / NEOCONS to try and diminsh the Presidents latest achievement. As an American, I am proud to see change making its way through the Country. Some argue that POTUS is destroying their Country as they know it, but I like the America POTUS has in mind, one with a diminished southern voice..

October 9, 2009 Diane, Washington, D.C. writes:

I could not agree more. I think it is offensive for those who have risked their lives and poured blood sweat and tears to deserve the award in the past, and this diminishes the importance of the prize.

I now have “HOPE” that I can win a Nobel Prize without actually accomplishing anything.

October 9, 2009 Barb in New York writes:

The Nobel Peace prize has become a joke. It is purely political but of course it won’t be spun that way. No one has a conscience anymore. Given the absolute slap in the face Obama’s ego had to endure with the Olympics shut down…this will probably make him feel better…eh? After all it’s how people feel about themselves that’s most important right, not if they are truly deserving. The example starts at the top. Mmmm Mmmm Mmmm.

October 9, 2009 Department of Offense » Morning Bell: The Nobel Intentions Prize » The Foundry writes:

[...] Morning Bell: The Nobel Intentions Prize » The Foundry [...]

October 9, 2009 Steve, Michigan writes:

The Nobel Prize for Obama is an embarrasment and should be rejected by him and offered by him to someone more deserving. Moreover, it is clearly a political act having nothing to do with the actual accomplishment of peace. Many, many well intentioned people in the thrall of wishful thinking have actually torpedoed peace and, in the area of peace and war, results matter. Perhaps we should rename the award the Neville Chamberlain Award as a tribute to articulate wishful thinking and give up the pretense of actual accomplishments.

October 9, 2009 Dave D Washington writes:

What a joke. This guy gets a cookie every time he turns a corner. And has done pretty much nothing so far. This is the hope and change we have been promised. What has happened to the intelligence of the worlds people.

October 9, 2009 R.U.WITHMEE writes:

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,THE MESSIAH HAS BEEN CROWNED!WHEN WILL ST PETER(NANCY PELOSI) BE ENSCONCED IN THIS EUPHORIC LAND OF OZZ?

October 9, 2009 Prince of Peace « Exigencies of the Age writes:

[...] The committee made no mention of any movement among world leaders, sparked by Obama or not, to “administer to a diseased and sorely-afflicted world the remedy it requireth.” Many of the reactions I have been reading seem to have a similar bent. [...]

October 9, 2009 Lloyd Scallan - New Orleans writes:

Is this some sort of joke? Has the Nobel Committee gone completely socialist. Or is this “pay-back” for the decision of the Olympic committee? Or is it because Obama is the first half-black president. The only award Obama should be awarded is “best lier” that ever disgraced the Oval office. It was bad enough Al Gore was given this, but at lease there was some sort of basis the Nobel committee could point to, although it was misguided. But what has Obama ever done to deserve any award? This joke totally diminishes the value of this award.

October 9, 2009 Nobel Peace Prize Future Nominee Speaks « Pied Patter writes:

[...] thought was sad, but today, I’ve been given hope that all I really need in life is to have the intention of something great.  Thanks Nobel Prize committee for recognizing that no great thing need every [...]

October 9, 2009 Tricia, Arizona writes:

I am just FLABBERGASTED!

October 9, 2009 Nothing goes better with coffee than a good hearty laugh « Copacabana writes:

[...] let The Heritage Foundation explain it a little more [...]

October 9, 2009 george virginia writes:

Why doesn’t the great one donate the cash prize
to people that are starving in the world. I hope
he would not give it to Acorn.

October 9, 2009 James Campbell, Richmond, VA writes:

The Nobel committee took a swipe at President Bush by awarding their trinket to Al Gore. The “kick Bush while he’s gone” endeavor continues. Mr. Obama has been in office 8 1/2 months, or so! Maybe he got it because of his Euro Left, Left wing tilt.

October 9, 2009 Skullsplitter, Maryland writes:

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.” Isaiah 5:20

The Three “Nobel” Stooges: Gore, Carter, Obama

October 9, 2009 Christopher Popham Smith, Boston, Ma. writes:

Excellent, though somewhat tongue-in-cheek analysis
of the Nobel Prize Award to President Obama.
To give such laudatory international ‘recognition’
to someone, based on what they ‘might’ be able to
accomplish in the future seems beyond absurd and
suggests a loss of reality in judgement by the Oslo
oligarchs. Without sounding conspiratorial, this
whole scenario smacks of the socialistic one-world
government theory that has been bandied about for a
couple of years. In jest, I’m sure, some are suggesting that Obama be nominated as head of the
E.U. as well, securing an even more consummate role
as the leader of the ‘free’ world.
As the headline in the Drudge Report said this a.m.:
Nobel Peace Prize? For what?

October 9, 2009 Ron, Derry NH writes:

You are spot on.
Giving an award for; Hope he makes some change in the world, is childish and demeaning to those dying to make a difference.

This is just more of the delinquency toward reality that elitists add to the game of life where their pomposity outweighs their relevance by actions done like this, to promote intentions of some one they have pre chosen for grandiosity with no proof.

This award has been cheapened into a political accommodation to promote intellectual hijacking over actual deeds and principles.

It has shown that the reason peace is so hard to achieve is that even the well intentioned, supposed intellectual will lie, abuse their position and fraud the public to maintain and promote their chosen type of people, even while others more worthy rot in prisons or are beaten and murdered defending true peace.

A callous disregard for actions committed in a life with the transference of accreditation to another without a deed of merit, for blatant self promotion is the reasons people distrust others and peace becomes such a struggle.

The Nobel Prize committee has chosen to exemplify why trust is so easily lost and how hard it is to keep.

October 9, 2009 Normca writes:

Obama has done more than nothing. His words do not mean anything. What he has said is that he wants a world without nukes and plans to remove a defensive weapon in Europe. He wants to unilaterally disarm America and weaken America so that it is equal to the rest of world - eliminate the super power. That is why he received this award which has become worthless from the days of its beginning. He speaks words the rest of world has said and feels. He has apologized for our country, apologized for freeing the world’s people. Liberals who call us Neocons are all about intentions and not about deeds. This award, like its present recipient is a sham. Now he has something else like Algore, a meaningless statute, for meaningless men.

October 9, 2009 Steve, Michigan writes:

William Manchester, in The Last Lion, reports that when Chamberlain returned to England from selling out the Czechs with his “peace in our time” promise, that the press were adulatory: “No conqueror returning from a victory on the battlefield,” The Times trumpeted, “has been adorned with nobler laurels.”

Peace is a worthy goal, but it is only the achievement, not the wishing for, that counts. We had better hope that Obama fares better than Mr. Chamberlain did. The Nobel Prize laurels are prematurely worn, as they have been before. did!

October 9, 2009 Suzanne, San Diego writes:

It is blatantly obvious by the announcement this morning that Barack Obama has received the Nobel Peace Prize that the Nobel Peace Prize committee has moved into the political realm of the oblivious left. It confounds me to the degree in which we as a nation and world have lost true values and strength of righteousness. This is ludicrous!

October 9, 2009 Phil, NC writes:

Just another example of corruption and manipulation of US and Global politics.

October 9, 2009 Zoltanne in Virginia writes:

The Nobel prizes have become a politically arranged Pageant. The significance of a Nobel prize has been minimized before this, but now, with Obama getting the Peace Prize, we see a farce. He has done nothing to earn this and should not accept it in light of all of those who actually HAVE worked for peace.

But his ego won’t let him.

Wondering if the next Olympic medals might not follow suit. Why bother with achievements or competition. Let’s just judge them on a bit of hope and promise. Why not give out the Olympic gold, silver, and bronze to those competitors who show good promise for tomorrow?

October 9, 2009 April, Colorado writes:

Congratulations to President Barack Obama for being selected by an international delegation to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

“Skullsplitter”…if you are going to quote scripture from the Bible, you may want to choose a different blog name.

October 9, 2009 Pete Kleff, Cypress, Texas writes:

Frankly awarding Obama the Nobel Peace Prize should come as no surprise. The “Peace Prize” has been an obscene joke for at least a decade.

October 9, 2009 Bruce Hubbert writes:

Heritage Foundation, “he should accept the award on behalf of the American people for all our many sacrifices to make the world a better place”

He just did.

October 9, 2009 Gisele, Ohio writes:

Because of the “fall” of mankind in the Garden of Eden, we are born with a sin nature and therefore live in a sinfilled world.

Due to this, we need military might to dissuade and discourage our enemies from attacking us and our allies. First we need God’s help and divine intervention, but God also uses armies to do His will and fighting also.

I disagree with Obama’s nuclear disarmament for America anywhere in the world. How can we trust our enemies to disarm? This will only give them more of an advantage.

This nobel prize awarded to Obama is a joke. The worldly (not Godly) “powers that be” obviously are consoling him for his blantant childish act of wasting taxpayer money and taking two jets to Copenhagen to try to persuade them to give Chicago and the people “he owes” the Olympics.

In my estimation, Obama is the poster child and vehicle to help usher in a One World Government/System. They needed to make him look good after another of his blunders in the Copenhagen fiasco.

What better way to do it and make it a global recognition, than awarding him the nobel peace prize…again I say, what a joke.

This is another disappointment for me and shows where we are headed…and it isn’t good or beneficial for America.

October 9, 2009 A. Heuston, Morgan Hill, CA writes:

Well said. I find this news very disturbing, and, unfortunately, not surprising.

October 9, 2009 Mike, Texas writes:

The current President has been referred to in past articles as “the Messiah, the Great one, etc”.
I wonder if this devisive talk and labels were used for past leaders or if this dialogue is reserved for leaders who do not heed or further the speaker’s beliefs.
This attitute follows the saying that “The brightest ray of sunshine can not penetrate a closed mind.” Author unknown.
This is not saying the current President is a “Ray of sunshine” though some will think so and there the lies the problem.

October 9, 2009 escondido california writes:

Regarding the article about FHA needing a bailout from the New York Times. David Strettfeld gets it completely wrong about FHA starting in 1934 to help lower income and first time buyers purchase homes. FHA was established in 1934 to guarantee loans to lenders who made home improvement loans. During the great depression lenders feared making loans with no collateral and people were in desperate need for basic necessary improvements(roofs etc.) It was over twenty years latter that FHA became available for home purchase. Makes you wonder what other major mistakes were made in the NY times article….

October 9, 2009 Andy; Florida writes:

The award is really for Obama’s redistribution of America’s wealth to the rest of the world; Soros is part of this somehow.

October 9, 2009 k anne NY writes:

…”Past winners have risked life, freedom, families, etc.??? “…. Do those ‘risk takers’ include Jimmy Carter and Al Gore??
The road to hell is paved with “good intentions” and that is where our President is leading this nation! So, in that respect, Congratulations, Mr. O! Do keep up your good work!
Mmmmm,mmmmm,mmmmm.

October 9, 2009 Martin/Georgia writes:

I was up at 04:30 this morning when this news broke. My first impression was to hurl then it occured to me that Oslo really couldn’t help it. It was that tingling feeling running up their collective legs.

October 9, 2009 Jill - Minnesota writes:

The Nobel Peace Prize is now meaningless. Don’t see how it can ever regain any sense of honor.

October 9, 2009 Richard Van Pelt, Satellite Beach Florida writes:

I think we all ought to congradulate Obama on his Nobel Appease Prize.

October 9, 2009 Virginia, San Diego writes:

Nobel Peace Prize should be renamed Nobel Prize for Created Crisis.

October 9, 2009 Roger S., Ma. writes:

“…the Nobel organization is a private one. And it has every right to give this award to whomever it chooses…”

Unfortunately the Nobel Committee is private only in terms of funding and legal structure, so here are some rhetorical questions regarding the past, present, and future choices impacting its and the recipients’ quite public reputations:

Wasn’t Yassir Arafat endowed with the same prize, just a few years ago ?!

May we expect the same prize for Mr. Ahmadinedjad, next year, now that he has “come clean” on the “secret” 2cnd Iranian nuclear concentration plant?

Why has Fidel Castro been so far denied this “honor”? Did he not facilitate for over 40 years the “peaceful coexistence” in close Caribbean quarters of the Soviet Bloc and the USA, while facilitating “peace and prosperity” in Cuba?

Last, not least, doesn’t this constitute a special mandate to BHO to receive forthwith the Dalai Lama at the White House?

Oh, I forgot: “modern man” needs no reasons, feel-good “vibes” suffice!

October 9, 2009 DAVID SAYERS GOLDSBORO,NC writes:

Seems that there are just as many moronic commies over there as here.

October 9, 2009 JP WA writes:

Giving the Nobel Prize to person who has accomplished nothing in the world. His greatest claim to frame is he organized a group of people to lazy work or to stupid to know that education is the only way to achieve a goal. Organizations like ACORN are what Obama is about. Obama has no idea what peace is. It is not flying around the stating that the United States is responible for all that is wrong in the world.

October 9, 2009 Mike Rapkoch, Billings, Montana writes:

I first saw this story on msn.com. That server was apparently having some technical problems in reporting comments made about Obama’s novel prize by Bishop Desmond Tutu. Within Bishop Tutu’s msn.com quote was the following:

“acticipittesgnevn gratr anriutantoars akngsou wrl akngou asaerplace fo all.”

This made more sense to me than the gobbledygook that escaped the evident foul up in msn.com’s system. Therefore, relying on Tutu’s quote as set out above, I better understand the award going to Obama.

Oh, it is possible Tutu was speaking in some foreign language unfamiliar to me, but even so his quoted remarks best explain, to me anyway, the noble decision.

October 9, 2009 Barack Hussein Obama Wins 2009 Nobel Peace Prize writes:

[...] news reports all morning and my favorite headline by far comes from The Heritage Foundation – The Nobel Intentions Prize.  My favorite quote comes from The Times of London - The committee said today that he had [...]

October 9, 2009 Jim Brokenbek, Amarillo, TX writes:

I cannot and will not join you in congratulating Obama on the Nobel Peace Prize… the man and his cronies are evil. The award has been a sham since it was awarded to Yasser Arafat. The committee is nuts and/or has a terribly warped sense of humor.

October 9, 2009 Freedom of Speech, TX writes:

To Worldbfreeforme:

There are undoubtedly millions who feel the same way you do.

As for a …diminished southern voice, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Before you leftists are done, every one’s voice will be diminished - including yours.

It will be too late for you to say “worldbefreeforme”.

October 9, 2009 Richard, Ma, Oh, Mi,Ca,Il,DC,Fl writes:

I am to scared to realy view my opinion. But, thanks for the forum. And I very much enjoy educating and informing myself through your articles. Love the West Pointer Carrafano.

I will say that I have friends fighting in the middle east and a friend who has a son going to boot camp Monday. I can not be wasting my prayer time on a once respected award.

October 9, 2009 Tom. Florida writes:

Today another false award was given to Barry. What did he do to warrant this award. I have asked friends and even a Doctor he did not know. Did discover a cure for AIDS? We all don’t know.

October 9, 2009 okiejim writes:

So that’s the secret. Just say you are going to do something and you will be rewarded. Why-o-why did I work so hard for years? I could have just said I was going to work hard and would have been rewarded.
Why was not President Reagan awarded the Peace Prize? He ended the cold war.
I would ask Worldbfree4me what positive changes Obama has made for America and Americans? I see none, and none in the future. He is selling your country out and you think that is good?
This is not a southern voice speaking, it is an American voice who fought for the freedoms you are so ready to give up without question.

October 9, 2009 Mad-andy, Missouri writes:

I give up! The world is insane!

October 9, 2009 Lee-White Tanks AZ writes:

One can only reach a single conclusion regarding who gets the Nobel Peace Prize: It goes to the number one “Flim-Flam” man of the last 365 days.

A prize obviously easily won by charlatans. First Al Gore of the “Greatest Hoax on Earth”, Global Warming aka Climate Change. Then comes number two (not necessarily that left on Air Force One but definitely made of the similar material) “The Second Greatest Scam on Earth” The Obama Administration and Lapdog Congress.

Two comments come immediately to mind:

First, the Peace Prize Committee really had to scrape the bottom of the barrel as it relates to accomplishment. SNL has it right. What is the level of Foreign Policy Peace related accomplishments, Zero, zero and Nada.

Second, P.T. Barnum has to be laughing so hard his gravesite’s a quiverin.

PC is Thought Control
LEE

October 9, 2009 Bud, Fullerton, Ca. writes:

I do not understand. If the health care reform bill is so “necessary for this nation” and “so despararely needed”, then why won’t the writers of the bill be honest and up front and present the bill openly and to the public? Could it be they know that the American people will not accept their hidden agendas if they are made known prior to passing the bill?

October 9, 2009 Leland, Illinois writes:

screen that truth, kool-aid drinkers. pathetic.

October 9, 2009 Skullsplitter, Maryland writes:

April is a better name? Naaaaaaaaaahhhhh!!!! :)

April here is one for you:

Proverbs 31:6 (New International Version)
Give beer to those who are perishing, wine to those who are in anguish.

(Skullsplitter is the name of a good beer!)

October 9, 2009 Chris, Edmond OK writes:

Heritage is oh so nice to congratulate Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize when he’s nothing to deserve it. You guys are just plain nice.

October 9, 2009 TREVOR MERCHANT BRONX NEW YORK CITY writes:

WHATMORE SHOULD I SAY SEPERATE FROM FORMER PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER AND FORMER VICE PRESDENT ALBERT GORE WERE BOTH AWARDED THIS SAME NOBLE PEACE PRIZE AS WELL . HENCETHEREFORE NOW IT IS PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA WHO IS NOW PREMATURELY AWARDED SAME WITHOUT LIKEWISE THE THE OTHERS AFOREMENTIONED DID NOT ACHIEVE ANYTHING OF GREATNESS AND OR EXCELLENCE TO DESERVE SUCH AN AWARD WHEREBY AS OF NOW THIS AWARD IS DIMINISH SIGNIFICANTLY AND HAS NO MEANING . NO ONE SHOLUD BE SURPRISE AS TO HOW THE LIE-BERALS RADICALS LEFTIST WILL WALLOW IN GLEE AND SPLENDOUR WHILE AT THE SAME TIME CONTINUE ON WITH THEIR HATE MESSAGES AND HATRED FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . MORE TO COME TREVOR MERCHANT BRONX NEW YORK CITY FRIDAY OCTOBER 09.2009

October 9, 2009 Barak in Washington DC writes:

This should be renamed the Politicaly Correct Peace Prize as I’m sure old Alfred is rolling over in his grave by now.

October 9, 2009 Susie writes:

This should not be a surprise to him; the nomination was decided in Feb. of this year! What achievements could he have possible made in one (1) month’s period?

October 9, 2009 Leith Wood, Virginia writes:

When my husband woke me this morning, having returned from the village news store, he said I would not believe what he’d just heard and might want to go back to sleep for quite awhile. The Morning Bell has it right. “1984″ and ” Alice In Wonderland”. We live in the north and the south and will keep working to keep America free and honest with high standards for all.

October 9, 2009 Wallyblu, Zion, IL writes:

Since this award is based on what has happened before February 1st and everything that has happened before February 1st has been blamed on George Bush, I wonder if the liberals will give George Bush credit for Obama winning the Noble Peace Prize?

Just a thought.

October 9, 2009 R.U.WITHMEE writes:

REMEMBER WHAT MARX SAID IN THE MANIFESTO “REMEMBER THE EXECUTIONER STANDS IN THE DOORWAY”—HAVE A NICE DAY “LIBERALS”

October 9, 2009 Frank L. White, Gulfport, MS writes:

I think he got the award for flying around the world so many times thus far in his presidency. We will have to replace the planes before he leaves office…………..

October 9, 2009 Frank L. White, Gulfport, MS writes:

Wow! Maybe I should get one also for GOOD Intentions.

October 9, 2009 Ella QUINN N.C. writes:

Obama needs to make peace with the american people.No prize should be given to a person who is destroying our great country america.Peace their will be no peace for him in heaven cause he wont make it the way he is doing us.

October 9, 2009 Talk Now Speaks Louder Than Actions writes:

[...] and Matthew Mosk . Nobel Peace Prize: past winners that have raised questions from UK Telegraph. Morning Bell: The Nobel Intentions Prize. Greenman: Obama Nobel Peace Prize win mocks world’s biggest award from Opinions – NY [...]

October 9, 2009 J&T, GA writes:

10/9/09:
Anybody want to fly to Sweden with us to pick up your Nobel Peace Prize?
We hear they’re selling them in the airport shops there.

October 9, 2009 Huh?????????????????? | The Dame Truth writes:

[...] H/T’s to Drkate’s View, Lame Cherry, We The People,  Talktop, Larry Bowyer   at Townhall.com and Andrea Shea King for passing the word. Also, Patriot Post, Heritage Foundation. [...]

October 9, 2009 Mike Sheahen, Hickory, North Carolina writes:

The Europeans have “lobbed a football into American politics”?

Au contraire! It’s more like the Europeans have lobbed another thinly disguised multiple warhead missile into our American value systems/”politics” by giving their Comrade Obama their “Nobel (so-called) Peace Prize”, not for any real accomplishments for real world peace (and the freedom and security which real peace requires), but instead to promote the ultimate dream and goal which those such as Obama share with them.

And what ultimate dream and goal is that they share with such as Obama?

It is a so-called “New World Order”, ruled by a “One World (Leftist) Government” oligarchy, the only thing yet to be seen being who will be its’ “President” or “General Secretary” or “Chairman” or “Dear Leader”.

Of course, as history repeatedly shows and proves to this day, there’s nothing “new” about the so-called “Progressive” Left’s ideas and ways which make individuals and whole populations subservient to government and/or its’ ruler.

Instead, our Republic (not democracy), the United States of America, is the new idea and way, the exception among all of history, based on our Constitutional principles of limited government and individual rights, freedoms, and prosperity, which, like a rising tide, tends to “raise all boats”, and has produced the freest, strongest, most prosperous and generous individuals and nation ever on the face of the earth.

But of course both “We the People of the United States” and freedom-loving people throughout the world can yet lose the freedoms, prosperity, and security which are this “last best hope of mankind, the USA.

In fact, evidently, we are in the process of losing it all, and all we have to do to keep doing so is keep falling for Leftist government elitists and statists such Obama and such as the similarly elitist political tool which is being made of the Nobel Peace Prize.

October 9, 2009 DAVID SAYERS GOLDSBORO,NC writes:

Here’s another two cents. A meaningless award given by meaningless people to a meaningless politictian. Pretty pathetic.

October 9, 2009 Don, Lima, Peru writes:

Bill Krystal said, “Now they should give Sarah Palin the Nobel Prize for Literature; nobody’s read her book yet, but at least a lot of people want to.”

I want one liberal here to tell us exactly what Obama has done to deserve this award. Has he liberated a single person? (Bush liberated 50 million of them from tyranical regimes.) Is a single Muslim woman less oppresseed beecause of Obama? (About 14 million females in Afganistan are better off today, and generations to come can have actual “hope” because of George Bush.) How about millions of Eastern Euros free from the yoke of the Soviets? (Oh, Reagan and Thatcher couldn’t be conisdered for their hard work on that since they were conservatives.)

October 9, 2009 mackp writes:

The President is on a roll. First he disgrace the office of the President.

Then America by apologizing for being the most given country in the world, with the lives,blood and tears of our servicemen and women and familys.

Now the Noble Peace Prize for doing what. Kissing up to Socialist dictators. Tearing done our National security. Liberals wake up before this man distroys this country.

3 out of 3 oh I’m sorry 3 out of 4 the olympic committe told him to kiss off. At least someone has some sense in this world.

Semper Fi

October 9, 2009 phyllis, texas writes:

mmmm mmmm mmm
Obama gets the Nobel Prize!
even tho it was not in his eyes!
mmm mmm mmm
he’s humble as can be ,
but I can’t refuse because IT”S FOR ME!!
{wave hands up high]
mmm mmm mmm
just wait and see; what Health Care will
finally be!
mmm mmm mmm
No mo’ people dying in the street;
and Gawd forbid you break your hip,
and a pain killer will be granny’s treat!
mmm mmm mmm
mmm mmm mmm

October 10, 2009 Dale, Oklahoma writes:

The Noble Prize is no longer nobEL.
It has quickly become a joke whose
worth is more from the monetary amount
received than the notion of the actual
prize itself. One may just as easily
get something out of a Cracker Jack
box that is equally valuable. At least
if you’re an American conservative or
member of the G.O.P.. For this…”prize”
continues to elude the greatest of
those political stripes.

It would seem that Hugh Hefner or Larry
Flynt have a better chance of having
Sainthood bestowed upon them by the Pope,
than Ronald Reagan would’ve had in
winning the IGNOBLE Nobel Peace Prize.
Even the inventor of dynamite ( were he
still alive today ) would be BLOWN AWAY
by the political, affirmative action
direction of his growingly meaningless
“prize” today.

October 10, 2009 Chris, Ohio writes:

Are you kidding me???? I can’t imagine this guy’s ego getting any bigger than it already is. Some have said we, as Americans, should be proud that our president was awarded this prize. I am embarrassed and saddened that they would choose this do-nothing liar and deceiver over the many, many more deserving nominees. Politics as usual. I see another first family tax-payer funded “vacation” to Oslo. I wonder if they will take the dog?

October 10, 2009 The Nobel Intentions Prize « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity writes:

[...] The Nobel Intentions Prize Filed under: Heritage.com — nhiemstra @ 7:37 am via: Heritage [...]

October 10, 2009 timothy f.crowley writes:

It is most comfortable knowing he’s being recognized for trying.
I voted twice for GWB and many of my family members and friends are of the Conservative”tribe”.
The Heritage Founbdation has value as well.

I say we must ALL work at Co-existing as Americans and stay open minded with those who aren’t blessed with the fruits and vegetables planted from our fathers and mothers.
Thankyou.

October 10, 2009 April, Colorado writes:

Skullsplitter. Congratulations on your ability to use a concordance.

October 10, 2009 Obama’s prize « Unto the Breach writes:

[...] the Heritage Foundation points out: The Nobel Peace Prize is not the Nobel Intentions Prize. Past winners have risked life, freedom [...]

October 10, 2009 James Ellison, Iowa writes:

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN WELCOME TO THE NOBEL PRIZE GAME….WE ARE YOUR HOST THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT…. ALL WE NEED FROM YOU IS A PROMISE TO DO SOMETHING….DOSEN’T HAVE TO BE A BIG SOMETHING… DON’T EVEN HAVE TO COME THROUGH WITH THAT PROMISE JUST ISSUE US A PROMISE AND WE WILL GIVE YOU ONE OF THESE WONDERFUL PRIZES…BOB WHAT WILL THEY WIN?…..THANK YOU TONY THE PEOPLE WHO GIVE US AMERICAN PEOPLE A PROMISE WILL WIN THIS WONDERFUL AND ELEGANT NOBEL PEACE PRIZE AND THE NOTERIETY THAT COMES WITH IT…IT OVER RIDES ALL OTHER PRIZES JUST THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS THAT HAVE GONE INTO THE PRIZE ITSELF BE DAMNED…IT IS YOURS JUST FOR THE PRICE OF A PROMISE…TONY…

seriously let’s all hope that he dosen’t get into that mind set and actually deliveres on his promises that he gave all of us during his campaign…i think we can all agree that will go along way towards our belief in the organization and their abilty to award the right people and that he will not get the “you love me, you realy love me” philosophy. then again…we can always tune in next week to THE NOBEL PRIZE GAME.

October 10, 2009 jay pister writes:

Sending 750 billion dollars a year to parts of the world that want to destroy us ranks as the most stupid thing the country has ever done…outside, perhaps , of electing a committed socialst to the nation’s leadership….

jay pister

October 11, 2009 Steve Skeete, Barbados writes:

President Obama, being the well-liked person that he is, it will almost obviously seem mean-spirited to criticize anyone wanting to give him an award, for any reason. However, I must criticize the 2009 Nobel award.

Taking into account the January 2009 cut off point for nominations, and the short time the President has been in office, it is clear that both his “nomination” and “choice” were foregone conclusions. This, in my view, demeans not the President but the nomination. Popularity and politics ruled out every other consideration.

However, take the nomination of Morgan Tsangarai. Now here is a man worthy of a peace prize. “Bloodied but unbowed”, he has chosen for the sake of his equally battered country, to refuse the call to arms, and instead serve as Prime Minister next to a monster who is intent on gobbling up Zimbabwe.

The Nobel committee was not looking for hope, because had it been, it would have found it in Tsangaria who with swollen lips from his hospital bed called on his supporters not to sink to the violent levels of their oppressor, Tsangarai who travelled far and wide seeking international intervention and financial aid for his country.

If that attitude of self-sacrifice, and love of country and the democratic ideal is not worthy of a Nobel acknowledgement then we might as well give up “hope”.

October 11, 2009 Hank Richards, Managing Partner - PRonlineNews writes:

Let’s see — “NEDA” the Iranian girl who was a household word a few weeks ago gets killed for protesting what may have been “BOGUS” election results — OBAMA says “WE SHOULDN’T MEDDLE” and get a Nobel Peace Prize — Simply rearkable and “NUTZ”

Hank Richards, Managing Partner
editor@pronlinenews.com

October 11, 2009 Hank Richards, Managing Partner - PRonlineNews writes:

Let’s see — “NEDA” the Iranian girl who was a household word a few weeks ago gets killed for protesting what may have been “BOGUS” election results — OBAMA says “WE SHOULDN’T MEDDLE” and gets a Nobel Peace Prize — Simply remarkable and “NUTZ”

Hank Richards, Managing Partner
editor@pronlinenews.com

October 12, 2009 jim toledo writes:

Who really cares? I mean anyone with any sense knows this award is political at best, Obama hasn’t done anything to fix anything, and he isn’t going to fix anything because everyone looks at him as a weak leader who will give into whoever yells the loudest. We should be spending all of our time getting the economy moving north and for the unemployment rate to go south. The only person in my recent memory who actually did some very stuff was Mother Theresa, those are the types of people that we should proclaim as the real heros.

October 12, 2009 John Watt Anaheim, CA writes:

There is hope for me— If Obama did what? This world is turly upside down.

October 12, 2009 LR Crane, Downsville, LA writes:

I find it very hard to understand how and why President Obama received this award. I always respected the individual who received it previously. As far as I can tell, President Obama has not done ANYTHING to qualify for this, heretofore, prestigious award. He is and has been “all talk and no action”. He has embarrased the American Citizens, he has projected an image that this Great Nation has been going down the wrong path, and has done so many things unhandedly and illegal. Mr Wilson in Congress told the truth when he said President Obama has lied. He has and continues to do so. It is very evident by the Tarp Bill that was unnecessarily and unethically pushed through Congress,as well as, the Health Care Bill that will most likely be done the same way. Something needs and must be done about this man - I respect the Office of the Presidency but not the man who was placed in that Office, most likely, illegally with voter fraud.

October 17, 2009 mary, ohio writes:

I think that obama geting the nobel peace prize was a insult to AMERICA, & the WORLD!

Leave a comment

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. Commenting is a privilege, not a right. Please keep it clean and stay on topic. Personal attacks and obscene language will not be tolerated. Essentially, don’t say anything you wouldn’t say to your mother at the dinner table.

Sign up for Morning Bell Email

Archives

Heritage Poll

Recent Visitors

Search The Blog