numbers and excluding legislative language is hardly a great achievement. Now they're trying to run the finances with mirrors.

People go to jail for less. What kind of dummies do they take us for? It's just one insult after another. When the pendulum swings, I hope they remember what "paybacks" are called.

Now is a good time to read the full text of the Declaration of Independence. Well into the document, John Hancock summed up how we all feel now; that we have peacefully appealled to the government, in thousands of town halls, emails, letters, blogs and a huge demonstration on the Mall. All of it has fallen on deaf ears..even worse our concerns have been flicked away like a dead fly on a windowsill. I am insulted by this congress, and its leader, and they must be thrown out in the next election.

"In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people."

Compromise doesn't mean compromising the essence of policy, all know it !!

1. As regards a Baucus scheme, the source of funding coming from a middle class is utterly against the commitment of Democratic party. And the bill would require people to buy insurance they can hardly afford.

The letter from 154 House Democrats to Speaker Nancy Pelosi urges her “to reject proposals to enact an excise tax on high-cost insurance plans that could be potentially passed on to middle-class families.”

“This is not an obscure detail of health care reform,” said Connecticut Rep. Joe Courtney, who drafted the letter. “Taxing health benefits was explicitly debated in the campaign by presidential candidates and people running for Congress.”

2. No cost-competitive advantage of the insurer-friendly scheme does not clear the grave concern about the unsustainable growth in cost of overall health care program in the long run. Baucus scheme Doesn't Bend Cost Curve Enough, Experts Say.

Byond, the scheme proposes a "fake" alternative, nonprofit insurance cooperatives — and it places so many "restrictions" on these cooperatives that, according to the Congressional Budget Office, they "seem unlikely to establish a significant market presence in many areas of the country."

Senator Rockefeller is also upset that the bill would turn nearly a half-trillion dollars over to insurance companies, whose profits he says are “out of sight.”

And the bill would lock many workers into health plans selected by their employers, without allowing them to shop for better, cheaper plans, an alternative that could help drive down costs for everyone.

3. Even with some benefit for primary practitioners, the baseless scheme does not come with fundamental payment reform, or a pay for value reimbursement formula. It means that the insurer-friendly scheme is not cleaning up the concerns over quality, regional imbalance issues and $9trillion of deficit over the next ten years.

((Here is some of CBO analysis : While the costs of the financial bailouts and economic stimulus bills are staggering, they are only a fraction of the coming costs from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that each year Medicaid will expand by 7 percent, Medicare by 6 percent, and Social Security by 5 percent. These programs face a 75-year shortfall of $43 trillion–60 times greater than the gross cost of the $700 billion TARP financial bailout)).

4. For Medicare & Medicaid system to survive from the most wasteful structure on earth, enough savings via fundamental changes need to be ensured, in return, the savings thereof suffice to meet the goal of well-planned public option.

((Even with far less visits to docs, which average a half or a third of them in any other free states, Americans pay roughly twice as much per person right now)).

5. For the record, prior to nation-wide deployment of reform, The State Of "Yes We Can", Minnesota influenced by Mayo clinic spends "20 percent" less per patient than the national average and 31 percent less than in the highest cost state. It highlights that no substantial tax raise is needed at least for sure.

((The $583 billion of revenue package, and the astronomical savings of public option aside, "20%" of $923.5bn (the combined Medicare and Medicaid cost per year, as of July) represents around $184.7bn per year and 1.847trillion over the next decade, and this patient-centered value alone could be sufficient to meet the goal of public option)).

6. In principle, the long-awaited and most hopeful health care plan is to meet these criterias : Affordability, Quality, and A Check function against runaway premiums thereof.

Clearly enough, due largely to its lower overhead cost, purchasing power and fundamental payment reform, the well-planned public option would be doing more than the baseless scheme by THE INDUSTRY in these aforementioned aspects.

Now is the moment to open the page of contemporary energy and financial upgrades glossed over in 8 years.

Thank You !

Boy, this is exactly what we do not need – expand medicaid.

The Feds are leading us to disaster with their Keynesian economics and they will not cut our losses and stop.

They abhore tax cuts even though it has a proven record of raising revenues – because they cannot swallow their pride and admit this current line of action WILL NOT WORK.

Increased Medicaid? That's one way to put more pressure on states already hurting.

Heritage Foundation should do an IN-DEPTH article on the background of EACH of Obama's "Economic Advisors". Who are these people? Are they really his advisors or just window dressing?

If someone else is calling the shots against the economic advisors' advice, (some Czar, perhaps), the economic advisors ought to have enough moral courage to resign and go to the press.

If the economic advisors are the primary source for this plan, their names should be publicly known and what their role was in the on-going implosion of our system.

We all know it is spending and borrowing but WHO is really the architect behind this?

I trust Nothing that this Adminstration has had it's hands on. They do not respect the Constitution! Time to Impeach before any more damage is done to our Republic.