• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Not the Change in Transparency Obama Promised

    In a stinging rebuke to corrupt special interests and the status quo the voters handed the President and his favored candidates an overwhelming defeat. Hope has arrived … at United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 in Colorado.

    Ernie Duran, Jr. – President of Local 7 – lost his re-election bid to Kim Cordova, a rank and file union member who works at Safeway. Along with Cordova union members voted in a new Secretary Treasurer, a new recording Secretary, and 19 of 25 board candidates who campaigned as part of Cordova’s reform slate. Change has come to the labor movement in Colorado.

    Why were union members so upset with their long serving President? Because he used their hard-earned union dues for his own personal gain. The President paid himself $162,000 a year, and put his son Ernie Duran III and his daughter Crisanta Duran on the union payroll for $134,000 a year each. The average Denver area grocery cashier, by contrast, earns only $24,000 a year and pays over $450 annually in mandatory dues to fund this largesse.

    Not content with paying himself and his children six-figure salaries, Duran also expensed top-shelf margaritas, a new blue tooth, and even Denver Bronco’s tickets to the union. All of this was paid for by rank and file workers mandatory dues. So it shouldn’t be surprising that he controversially spent those dues heavily to defeat a ballot initiative that would have made paying union dues voluntary.

    Rank and file union members held Duran accountable for his nepotism and misuse of their money. They could do so because of the union transparency reforms the Department of Labor undertook under President Bush. Secretary Chao updated the LM-2 financial reporting forms that unions must file each year. The old versions of the forms provided union members with virtually no useful information about how their union spent their dues. The new forms required unions to itemize their expenditures and report in detail how much they paid all of their employees – like the President, and his children on staff. Thanks to Secretary Chao UFCW Local 7 members could easily see how Duran was spending their money – and they wanted none of it. Union financial transparency protects union members from corrupt officers.

    Unfortunately union leaders do not want to face such scrutiny from their members. So they have lobbied Obama to gut the financial transparency reforms that Secretary Chao implemented. They want to keep their members in the dark. Did the Obama administration promptly show these self-serving union officials door because it would never sacrifice workers rights to benefit a special interest – even one that donated heavily to their campaign.

    No.

    The Obama administration is moving quickly to get rid of the new union financial disclosure requirements. This is not the change that Obama promised America, but it is the change union members are getting.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Not the Change in Transparency Obama Promised

    1. AN AMERICAN says:

      Good for reasonable union members to act.

      Union members are people. They get used and abused just like non-union members.

      And, like all reasonable people, they need sound, accurate information to know when they are being duped.

      They should be disseminating what happened there to all unions. For, you know, this type of fraud, waste, and abuse is rampant.

    2. Roger S., Ma. says:

      Essentially unions act as agents of employees to deal with their employers. Nothing essentially wrong with that so long as all involved consent to the transactions. As such they also are, however, no different from any other business offering goods or services in the marketplace, and should be subject to the same rules as employers regarding proper accounting and reporting practices, also taxation. At the very least, this would make more transparent, also to their members, their "true costs". Any other treatment sets the stage for corrupt practices, from coercion of members, to lack of transparency, to outright fraud. All of us, not just union-members, end up having to bear those costs. Almost needless to say, this is another area where the current Administration will not even recognize, let alone enact, any real improvement. (Those votes are just too "precious".) Kudos to the members of Local 7 UFCW for having acted so effectively, where our government would not!

    3. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 09/24/09 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country…

    4. Bobbie Jay says:

      It may sound funny, but "honesty" in the business should be a requirement for every paid position, ESPECIALLY GOVERNMENT. Now there's a STRETCH, eh Mr. President? Seriously, we can get rid of the rif raf right away…ESPECIALLY ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT!

    5. Pingback: Governor Walker vs Wisconsin Government Unions, Inc. | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    6. Pingback: The American People Can’t Afford to Lose Wisconsin Union Showdown : USACTION NEWS

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×