- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Reaction Roundup: Heritage Experts on Obama's UN Speech

Posted By Rory Cooper On September 23, 2009 @ 1:17 pm In International | Comments Disabled

Earlier today, President Barack Obama addressed the General Assembly of the United Nations. You can read the full transcript here [1].  Experts in foreign policy and international affairs at The Heritage Foundation watched the speech and had plenty of reaction.  Here are some highlights:

On Reaction at U.N.:

“The other U.N. member states have to be beside themselves with glee. President Obama gave them virtually everything they could ask for without demanding anything in return that was not already on the agenda – and which they are prepared to twist to their advantage. He did not even ask them to support more accountability, transparency, or efficiency in the U.N. , which will be leading action on the very complex and expensive tasks that he is proposing.

The Obama administration probably thinks that its actions and this speech have purchased them the goodwill of U.N. member states, which  will translate into support for U.S. policies. They are setting themselves up for disappointment. The political nature of the U.N. is combative and tough. Most member states consider these concessions their due. They will pocket them and stand firm to defend their interests. Cooperation will be on their terms, on issues they wish to pursue. The naïveté of the speech was staggering.”

Brett D. Schaefer [2], Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs, Heritage’s Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, and author of ConUNdrum: The Limits of the United Nations and the Search for Alternatives [3]

Compared to Other Obama Speeches:

“Was this Obama’s most naïve speech ever? It is a very strong candidate, but I think there is intense competition for that accolade. The president’s speeches in Cairo, Strasbourg and Prague would all vie for that title. Still, his address today will go down in history as one of the weakest major addresses by a U.S. president on foreign policy in a generation, by a leader who seems embarrassed, even ashamed, by the power and greatness of his own country.”

Nile Gardiner [4], Director, Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation

On Afghanistan:

“Obama’s statements on Afghanistan at the U.N. today — which failed to mention the need to defeat the Taliban insurgency — will likely be interpreted by our allies as a sign that he is beginning to waver in his commitment to finishing the job of stabilizing and securing Afghanistan and preventing its return to being a safe haven for international terrorists. This is highly unfortunate. Without American leadership on Afghanistan, the entire civilized world will remain hostage to international terrorists, backed by the Taliban leadership, intent on attacking innocents at the times and places of their own choosing.”

Lisa Curtis [5], Senior Research Fellow, Heritage’s Asian Studies Center

On the Middle East:

“President Obama proclaimed, ‘ We must embrace a new era of engagement based on mutual interests and mutual respect, and our work must begin now.’  But in the Middle East, his administration’s engagement policy has yielded very little of substance. The Israeli-Palestinian talks, which the administration has trumpeted as an urgent priority, remain in limbo. Obama’s meeting yesterday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas was little more than a tense photo opportunity that did little to clear the way for renewed peace negotiations.

“Although Washington had hoped to announce the formal opening of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, this continues to be blocked by the refusal of Palestinians to agree to negotiations until Israel has halted the expansion of settlements in disputed territory. Never mind that many of the settlements would end up on the Israeli side when the borders are redrawn in a final agreement.

Iran also has proven to be highly resistant to the Obama administration’s calls for engagement. Despite three rounds of sanctions imposed by the U.N. Security Council and continued international pressure to halt its uranium-enrichment efforts, Iran has agreed to participate in talks on a wide variety of subjects — except for uranium enrichment, which it is accelerating. It will be interesting to see how Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad responds to Obama’s speech when he speaks later this afternoon. But the big question is what the Obama administration will do when engagement fails.”

James Phillips [6], Senior Research Fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs, Heritage’s Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/23/reaction-roundup-heritage-experts-react-to-obamas-un-speech/

URLs in this post:

[1] the full transcript here: http://wvgazette.com/News/politico/200909230252

[2] Brett D. Schaefer: http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/brettschaefer.cfm

[3] ConUNdrum: The Limits of the United Nations and the Search for Alternatives: https://secure.heritage.org/bookstore/

[4] Nile Gardiner: http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/NileGardiner.cfm

[5] Lisa Curtis: http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/LisaCurtis.cfm

[6] James Phillips: http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/JamesPhillips.cfm

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.