• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Panel of Experts See No Economic Stimulus from Cap and Trade

    The Heritage Foundation recently hosted an event on the economic impacts of cap and trade. Multiple organizations have modeled the effects of cap and trade and found varied results but none of them provided the news you’d want to hear, especially in a recession. Despite repeated attempts to sell cap and trade as a jobs bill, not one scenario of even one presenter (including the three government agencies) projected a net increase in income or employment from cap and trade. The entire debate was over the magnitude of income, consumption and job losses.

    Speakers included representatives from the National Black Chamber of Commerce, The Brookings Institution, the Energy Information Administration, the Congressional Budget Office, the Environmental Protection Agency, and The Heritage Foundation. The Congressional Research Service’s recently analyzed seven studies on the projected cost (including the National Association for Manufacturers’ study and the Massachusetts Institute for Technology’s study). None of the studies projected jobs or income growth from cap and trade. While these studies differed, they only differed on the magnitude of negative impacts. There was no disagreement on the sign. That is, cap and trade will lead to fewer jobs and lower income.

    The disparity in the cost estimates was largely a result of differing assumptions on the use of offsets as well as the commercialization of carbon capture and sequestration and increases in the amount of nuclear energy. But two things are clear: This is not a jobs bill. This is not an economic stimulus.

    Regardless of the cost estimates and regardless of whether global warming is a significant problem, the studies all agree that cap and trade will not stimulate the economy. So maybe the trade off is lost jobs and lost income for a cooler planet?

    Climatologist Chip Knappenberger projected that the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation would moderate temperatures by only five hundredths of a degree in 2050 and no more than two-tenths of a degree Celsius at the end of the century.

    More on the costs of cap and trade can be found here. You can watch yesterday’s event, and find the presentations of the presenters, here.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    11 Responses to Panel of Experts See No Economic Stimulus from Cap and Trade

    1. Bob, CO says:

      Waxman-Markey will not create positive change for the environment, but it will create higher unemployment numbers and increase energy costs. Write your Senators to oppose cap and trade at http://tiny.cc/pxIgi.

    2. Pingback: Panel of Experts See No Economic Stimulus from Cap and Trade » The Foundry

    3. Pingback: Left, Center, and Right Agree: No Stimulus from U.S. Global Warming Plan « Prayer, News & Action

    4. jim, florida says:

      Passing cap and trade gives me, as well as most of the population , a bad case of gas, which just adds to the problem if it does indeed exist.

    5. Pingback: Today’s Calamity: Cap and Trade Destroys Jobs and Destroys Wealth | Conservative Principles Now

    6. Pingback: The Verdict’s In: Cap and Trade Will Not Work « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    7. Pingback: Panel of Experts See No Economic Stimulus from Cap and Trade » The Foundry

    8. Pingback: Taxa pe respiratie, sau comunismul verde « Durox’s Weblog

    9. Pingback: 83 CEOs Make Case for Cap and Trade | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    10. Pingback: 83 CEOs Make Case for Cap and Trade | Conservative Principles Now

    11. Pingback: Panel of Experts See No Economic Stimulus from Cap and Trade « John Rysavy for Congress

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×