• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Why the U.N.’s Arms Trade Treaty Won’t Work

    The U.N. wants to negotiate an Arms Trade Treaty. The Heritage Foundation recently published a lengthy study of this proposal. It found that the Treaty, if brought into being as currently projected, will be used not to restrict the access that dictators and terrorists have to conventional arms, but to reduce the ability of democracies like Israel to defend their people against terrorism.

    This week brought further evidence of the U.N.’s impending failure. First came the announcement of a major arms deal between Vladimir Putin’s Russia and Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. The size of the deal is staggering: Russia has given Venezuela a $2.2 billion line of credit. According to the Economist, this deal is about one quarter the size – to take one comparison – of all of Britain’s arms sales in 2008.

    And Venezuela’s got quite the shopping list: 92 T-72 tanks, plus a lot more sophisticated hardware. What would the U.N.’s projected treaty do about this transaction between an authoritarian and repressive Russia and a dictatorial Venezuela? Nothing at all. Indeed, the treaty would give the deal a pat on the back, because it explicitly states that all nations, even dictatorships, have “the right…to manufacture, import, export, transfer and retain conventional arms.”

    So if this treaty would allow Venezuela to import all the arms it wants, what use is it? One of the not-so-hidden aims of its backers is to stop fellow democracies from selling arms to Israel. Sometimes, this aim comes out in code: take, for instance, Iran’s claim that “the major problem of the developing countries” rests in the culpability of “certain major exporters,” i.e. “certain Western countries.” But the NGOs backing the treaty are less circumspect. Take, for instance, the remarks of Rebecca Peters, director of the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), on the 2007-2008 Gaza conflict:

    If combatants [Israel and Hamas] are violating international humanitarian law, then states supplying them with weapons are knowingly assisting these violations and must bear some responsibility. An Arms Trade Treaty would prohibit such arms transfers

    Note how Peters equates Israel and Hamas, and then stigmatizes both Israel and any state that supplies Israel with the weapons it needs to defend itself from terrorists as the targets of the U.N.’s treaty.

    Of course, the U.S. itself is one of Israel’s most important suppliers, and thus the biggest target of these NGOs. But Britain sells to Israel too, and these sales have been a frequent target of British activists. This week has brought a further development. On Thursday, Britain’s Trades Union Congress, the umbrella organization of trade unions in Britain, voted in favor of wide-ranging sanctions against Israel that included a ban on importing goods produced in some Israeli settlements, divestment from some companies, and an end to arms trading with Israel.

    As always, Iran’s culpability in supplying Hamas with its weaponry counted for nothing in this shameful vote. If the U.N. gets its way with its treaty, we can expect a lot more of these votes, and a lot more pressure being exerted on their own governments by the self-nominated, self-righteous leaders of civil society, all of them willfully blind to Israel’s right of self-defense against the aggressions of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.

    The problem is not the absence of an arms trade treaty. It is, as the Economist points out in its latest survey of the arms trade in Africa, that “Borders are porous. Corruption eases the flow. Arms dealers can readily buy forged licenses and paperwork from officials.” In other words, the problem is that there are too many authoritarian, dictatorial, malevolent, and incompetent governments in the world. These are the same governments that are negotiating the U.N.’s treaty, and which will have the responsibility of putting it into effect. And that is why the treaty is a fool’s errand.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Why the U.N.’s Arms Trade Treaty Won’t Work

    1. Bobbie Jay says:

      Obviously the UN has no interest or intent on protecting the world with it's bias and life threatening conduct using our money.

    2. Bill, San Antonio TX says:

      This is just one of many reasons why we need to get out of the UN.

      There is no way to stop this; the UN does not listen to the US, anyway.

      They are knowingly helping Iran who is the major Islamic Jihadist Terrorist country in the world. It is overt with nary a mod or wink. Little does the UN realize, Iran does not care what anyone thinks and will lie to obtain its goals.

      At the same time, the world condemns and emasculates Israel at every turn.

      The Ottoman Empire is dead. The world owes Israel after what happened to the Jews throughout history and especially in WWII. This collective guilt was the reason why the newly formed UN voted for Israel's acceptance as a "nation".

      The world does not help Israel; they leave her to constantly fight for survival.

      The world's nations will be judged.

    3. Buck Crosby Hubert , says:

      I ask again ? Why the h— are we in the useless and corrupt UN . We need to get the h— out and start an organization of constitutional republics based on capitalism and freedom . Even if we were the only members it would be better than associating with the gross , disgusting filth in the UN , and we could use the money going to the UN for worthy causes like paying our bills.

    4. Buck Crosby Hubert , says:

      It won't work because it won't rein in the tyrants that need to be controlled . Much like gun control in a country , only the good obey the law , the criminals its meant to control will only ignore it . Do you think North Korea and Venezuela would respect it ?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.