• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Need To Get A Grip On Tires

    There is one, and only one, notable development in the Chinese tires case. The rest is old news, non-news, or nonsense.

    Why does anyone care about this case? It’s certainly not because of the amount of trade affected. Replacement tires constitute a drop in the bucket of US-China trade.

    It’s not because it will dent US unemployment. Three years of tariffs on tires from one country will do almost nothing for production in the US.

    It’s not because of the potential Chinese reaction. The level of grassroots interest in this is nothing like the level needed to actually worry the Party. The Ministry of Commerce will use domestic politics to justify demands or actions, but it is a negotiating tool in this instance, nothing more.

    The PRC has far too much to lose in a genuine trade confrontation with the US. And low-end tire tariffs hardly prevent Chinese trade policy from proceeding on its merry way – simultaneously seeking to locate jobs at home and move up the technology chain for strategic reasons. The difficulty of doing both simultaneously necessitates not only distortions of comparative advantage, but a broadly mercantilist model for most of the traded goods sector. This approach is not threatened in the slightest by replacement tire tariffs.

    The case is not even a notable development in US policy at the operational level. The International Trade Commission has been slapping tariffs on Chinese goods at the rate of nearly two products per month. The notion that the USTR conducted serious negotiations offering to halt tire tariffs for substantial Chinese reform is silly – it will take much, much more than that to alter Chinese trade practices.

    The only reason the tire tariff matters is the precedent that it may create. Will there be more safeguard cases? Will other unused weapons in the American trade arsenal be trotted out against the PRC?

    One source of risk, of course, is the Congress. But Congress has been remarkably restrained in the face of near 10 percent unemployment. In any case, the legislative branch is expected to agitate for protection; it is the executive branch which defends the national interest in open trade.

    Here lies the true reason for all the face. The tire case may be the first real insight into President Obama’s views on trade with China. It may be because, eight months into his term, we have neither a strong philosophical statement nor a set of practical details from a President who has repeatedly shown the ability to offer both.

    President Obama clearly doesn’t want to say anything more about trade than he has to. That is an abandonment of his responsibilities. The uncertainty created is what has sparked the near-frenzy over a possible trade conflict.

    The sole important aspect of the tire case is the fact that, despite the perfect opportunity, President Obama still refuses to tell the country and our partners what he thinks about China trade. No more empty or contradictory soundbites, sir, time to lay it on the line.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Need To Get A Grip On Tires

    1. Ozzy6900, CT says:

      Good luck in trying to stop the Chinese by imposing tariffs. They hold most of the US Debt so it will be interesting to see how they can be stopped.

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 09/17/09 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country…

    3. Pingback: Deflate the Tire Tariff « Des Moines Register Staff Blogs | The Des Moines Register

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.