<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Power: An Expensive and Inefficient Way to Reduce CO2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: $50 light bulbs! Unfortunately for you, the green in Green Energy is your dollars…[Reader Post] &#124; Flopping Aces</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-308294</link>
		<dc:creator>$50 light bulbs! Unfortunately for you, the green in Green Energy is your dollars…[Reader Post] &#124; Flopping Aces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-308294</guid>
		<description>[...] has the effect of increasing food prices while doing nothing for the environment. Then there’s wind and solar energy, neither of which is even remotely close to being competitive with fossil fuels. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has the effect of increasing food prices while doing nothing for the environment. Then there’s wind and solar energy, neither of which is even remotely close to being competitive with fossil fuels. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unfortunately for you, the green in Green Energy is your dollars… &#124; RedState</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-307615</link>
		<dc:creator>Unfortunately for you, the green in Green Energy is your dollars… &#124; RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-307615</guid>
		<description>[...] has the effect of increasing food prices while doing nothing for the environment. Then there’s wind and solar energy, neither of which is even remotely close to being competitive with fossil fuels. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has the effect of increasing food prices while doing nothing for the environment. Then there’s wind and solar energy, neither of which is even remotely close to being competitive with fossil fuels. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince, Chicago, IL U</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-93324</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince, Chicago, IL U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-93324</guid>
		<description>@SaneOne 
 
I could think of a deliberately exaggerated non-problem cynically perpetuated by alternative energy interests whose sudden &#8220;concern&#8221; for the earth is frankly sickening. 
 
Oh, what a coincidence, many of the loudest voices also have a ton of money sunk into alternative energy... ulterior motive much? 
 
For the record, I don&#039;t own an estate. I&#039;m a truck driver, and I still think those things are eyesores. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SaneOne</p>
<p>I could think of a deliberately exaggerated non-problem cynically perpetuated by alternative energy interests whose sudden &ldquo;concern&rdquo; for the earth is frankly sickening.</p>
<p>Oh, what a coincidence, many of the loudest voices also have a ton of money sunk into alternative energy&#8230; ulterior motive much?</p>
<p>For the record, I don&#039;t own an estate. I&#039;m a truck driver, and I still think those things are eyesores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting Conservation Back into Conservatism &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-91383</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting Conservation Back into Conservatism &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-91383</guid>
		<description>[...] create jobs. Wind and solar will take a similar nibble out of the jobless numbers &#8211; but wind turbines are expensive and inefficient, and solar panels will get more expensive before they get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] create jobs. Wind and solar will take a similar nibble out of the jobless numbers &#8211; but wind turbines are expensive and inefficient, and solar panels will get more expensive before they get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-80442</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-80442</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think wind or solar can be a large scale electricial source for energy security reasons. Either you need backup generation or you need transmissions lines to send (or receive) power elsewhere. Both solutions cost lot of money, so you are better to not rely too much on wind. 
 
However, I don&#039;t think it a bad idea to use wind power, take for exemple in Texas, they use lots of gas, which is suited well to backup wind electricity, while being less reliant on gas. 
 
I think the idea is to reduce CO2 with any solution possible, and that&#039;s why Obama is pushing renewables. No one is for inefficients methods, i. e. wind power without backup or transmission lines. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think wind or solar can be a large scale electricial source for energy security reasons. Either you need backup generation or you need transmissions lines to send (or receive) power elsewhere. Both solutions cost lot of money, so you are better to not rely too much on wind.</p>
<p>However, I don&#039;t think it a bad idea to use wind power, take for exemple in Texas, they use lots of gas, which is suited well to backup wind electricity, while being less reliant on gas.</p>
<p>I think the idea is to reduce CO2 with any solution possible, and that&#039;s why Obama is pushing renewables. No one is for inefficients methods, i. e. wind power without backup or transmission lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-55877</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-55877</guid>
		<description>Saneone- you are the exaggerater! I&#039;m sure your ties and profit are in this waste! Your ignorance reigns supreme!  
Oh, and thank you JoAnne. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saneone- you are the exaggerater! I&#039;m sure your ties and profit are in this waste! Your ignorance reigns supreme! </p>
<p>Oh, and thank you JoAnne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Goggin, USA</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-55798</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Goggin, USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-55798</guid>
		<description>For a thorough debunking of the misleading and false claims presented in this fossil-fuel industry funded report, please see our website:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.awea.org/blog/?mode=viewid&amp;post_id=196&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.awea.org/blog/?mode=viewid&amp;post_id...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Michael Goggin, American Wind Energy Association </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a thorough debunking of the misleading and false claims presented in this fossil-fuel industry funded report, please see our website:<br />
  <a href="http://www.awea.org/blog/?mode=viewid&amp;post_id=196" rel="nofollow">http://www.awea.org/blog/?mode=viewid&#038;post_id&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>Michael Goggin, American Wind Energy Association</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnne, Arizona</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-55433</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnne, Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-55433</guid>
		<description>Wind and solar can be useful supplementary energy sources for specific applications. However, it is hogwash that they can be major sources in the foreseeable future for even 20% of our energy needs. Since 1979 (for 30 years!) when President Carter created the Dept. of Energy during the Oil Embargo, Oregon has offered tax credits up to 30%of the cost for installing residential solar hot water heaters. According to the Oregon DOE, &quot;More than 16,000 solar water heaters have been installed in Oregon since 1979 for domestic hot water, swimming pools or spas. A typical solar domestic water heater provides between 50 percent and 60 percent of a home&#039;s water heating needs.&quot; Do the math: that is 533 of these government subsidized ugly flimflams sold to the homeowners in a super-environmentalist state per year, where the political will and personal commitment to the &quot;cause&quot; is extreme.  And despite the overcast skies, the Oregonians claim better efficiency than Florida for their solar systems! 
The Far Left wants all fossil fuel consumption to stop immediately, and thinks the devastation to the world economy, and the millions of dead humans that would result, would be a good consequence, not a bad one.  Unfortunately, they&#039;ve got true believers in elected, appointed, and bureaucratic jobs throughout all levels of government now.  They have had their federal and state subsidized experiments now for decades, and the results are worse than pathetic.  It is time to pull the plug. We can&#039;t afford their sandbox to play in anymore, and they&#039;ve become dangerous to themselves and others. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind and solar can be useful supplementary energy sources for specific applications. However, it is hogwash that they can be major sources in the foreseeable future for even 20% of our energy needs. Since 1979 (for 30 years!) when President Carter created the Dept. of Energy during the Oil Embargo, Oregon has offered tax credits up to 30%of the cost for installing residential solar hot water heaters. According to the Oregon DOE, &quot;More than 16,000 solar water heaters have been installed in Oregon since 1979 for domestic hot water, swimming pools or spas. A typical solar domestic water heater provides between 50 percent and 60 percent of a home&#039;s water heating needs.&quot; Do the math: that is 533 of these government subsidized ugly flimflams sold to the homeowners in a super-environmentalist state per year, where the political will and personal commitment to the &quot;cause&quot; is extreme.  And despite the overcast skies, the Oregonians claim better efficiency than Florida for their solar systems!</p>
<p>The Far Left wants all fossil fuel consumption to stop immediately, and thinks the devastation to the world economy, and the millions of dead humans that would result, would be a good consequence, not a bad one.  Unfortunately, they&#039;ve got true believers in elected, appointed, and bureaucratic jobs throughout all levels of government now.  They have had their federal and state subsidized experiments now for decades, and the results are worse than pathetic.  It is time to pull the plug. We can&#039;t afford their sandbox to play in anymore, and they&#039;ve become dangerous to themselves and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaneOne, London</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-55431</link>
		<dc:creator>SaneOne, London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-55431</guid>
		<description>SaneOne, London 
 
&quot;Why isn&#8217;t anyone mentioning the killing of birds? And other flying species?&quot; 
 
um...because that issue is a deliberately exaggerated non-problem cynically perpetuated by fossil fuel energy interests whose sudden &quot;concern&quot; for wild life is frankly sickening. 
 
Have you even seen a modern wind turbine? 
 
A bird is little more likely to kill itself flying into one of the giant slow moving turbines than it would be to kill itself flying into a building. 
 
The few thousands of bird deaths from wind turbines is miniscule compared to the millions and millions of birds killed on our roads and/or by household pets. 
 
Then there is the FACT that burning fossil fuels is already killing BILLIONS of animals and will kill TRILLIONS more (Don&#039;t believe me? Go take a look at some research on the effects of acidification on the worlds coral reefs - and that&#039;s just ONE example). 
 
Get your head out of the sand, learn something for yourself and get used to the idea that the world needs to change. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SaneOne, London</p>
<p>&quot;Why isn&rsquo;t anyone mentioning the killing of birds? And other flying species?&quot;</p>
<p>um&#8230;because that issue is a deliberately exaggerated non-problem cynically perpetuated by fossil fuel energy interests whose sudden &quot;concern&quot; for wild life is frankly sickening.</p>
<p>Have you even seen a modern wind turbine?</p>
<p>A bird is little more likely to kill itself flying into one of the giant slow moving turbines than it would be to kill itself flying into a building.</p>
<p>The few thousands of bird deaths from wind turbines is miniscule compared to the millions and millions of birds killed on our roads and/or by household pets.</p>
<p>Then there is the FACT that burning fossil fuels is already killing BILLIONS of animals and will kill TRILLIONS more (Don&#039;t believe me? Go take a look at some research on the effects of acidification on the worlds coral reefs &#8211; and that&#039;s just ONE example).</p>
<p>Get your head out of the sand, learn something for yourself and get used to the idea that the world needs to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA Pundits - International</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/14/wind-power-an-expensive-and-inefficient-way-to-reduce-co2/#comment-55421</link>
		<dc:creator>PA Pundits - International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/?p=14759#comment-55421</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wind Power: An Expensive And Inefficient Way To Reduce&#160;CO2...&lt;/strong&gt;


By Nick Loris
In a speech in May, President Obama pushed for our nation to transition to renewable energy and pointed to Denmark as an example of proof it can be done:
Unfortunately. America produces less than 3 percent of our electricity through rene...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wind Power: An Expensive And Inefficient Way To Reduce&nbsp;CO2&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>By Nick Loris<br />
In a speech in May, President Obama pushed for our nation to transition to renewable energy and pointed to Denmark as an example of proof it can be done:<br />
Unfortunately. America produces less than 3 percent of our electricity through rene&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

