Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Free Tread

Posted September 12th, 2009 at 9:31pm in American Leadership 0 Print This Post Print This Post

President Obama has decided to apply heavy tariffs to passenger car and light truck replacement tires made in China. This is the latest and worst episode in an ill-advised assault on free trade with the PRC.

Taking WTO-compliant steps to counter Chinese subsidies or other mercantilist behavior is entirely reasonable. (That doesn’t mean any WTO-compliant action is a good idea — the “Buy America” provisions passed as part of the stimulus package may be WTO-compliant but are still terrible policy.) The problem here is that American actions are occurring in a policy vacuum. Our actions appear to be driven by domestic politics, a dangerous development given the importance and complexity of our trade with China.

The tire case has general trade ramifications; it also bears specifically on the PRC. Since the beginning of President Obama’s term through the end of August, the U.S. International Trade Commission has made preliminary or final recommendations to impose or keep tariffs in 25 cases. Twenty-two of these impositions include China. This continues an unwise targeting of the PRC that began in July 2008 under the Bush administration.

President Obama made a mistake.

Presidents must consider the entire country, not just a particular group in a particular sector. In that role, Presidents often clash with the Congress, where districts and states have disproportionate weight on certain issues. The tire case stems from a provision created by Congress to permit tariffs ostensibly to protect against import surges from China. Six previous attempts to invoke the provision failed under the Bush administration, four times rejected personally by President Bush.

In this case, President Obama abdicated his responsibility to the national interest. A flood of complaints against the PRC will follow from unions and the Congress. Most of these will be misguided and some will be outright dangerous. As an illustration, the tires being targeted by this tariff sell at low prices. Now, poorer people face paying more during an economic slump.

The best course would be for the President of the United States to reject specific unilateral targeting of the PRC. It is now imperative for President Obama to present his vision of trade with China, one which is built on the principle of open trade, not stealth protectionism, narrow interests and punishing the poor.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.