Comments on: Third Site Missile Defenses Would Demonstrate the Indivisibility of Transatlantic Security http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Bill, Pittsburgh, PA http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/#comment-56447 Bill, Pittsburgh, PA Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:52:19 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=14557#comment-56447 This has shades of the 1930's. The leaders must need a history lesson if they think that appeasing an aggressive government will bring peace or stability. I can certainly understand eastern European fears given the history of the last century. This has shades of the 1930's. The leaders must need a history lesson if they think that appeasing an aggressive government will bring peace or stability. I can certainly understand eastern European fears given the history of the last century.

]]> By: Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government? « A Nation ADrift-Why? http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/#comment-56369 Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government? « A Nation ADrift-Why? Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:48:49 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=14557#comment-56369 [...] http://www.foundry.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility... [...] [...] http://www.foundry.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility... [...]

]]> By: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Conservative Leaders Speak Out on Obama Missile Defense Decision http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/#comment-56220 The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Conservative Leaders Speak Out on Obama Missile Defense Decision Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:29:06 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=14557#comment-56220 [...] http://www.foundry.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibilit... [...] [...] http://www.foundry.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibilit... [...]

]]> By: Carroll George, Arli http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/#comment-56125 Carroll George, Arli Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:54:44 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=14557#comment-56125 Technological advances in mass communications, transportation, and other areas have certainly advanced the good life. 911 has shown that any technologies obtainable by terrorists will, without hesitation, apply them to mass destruction and mass killing. Self defence is a basic right and extends to defense of our way of life and friends from any possible event that we know by experience terrorist will do when they obtain the means. Technological advances in mass communications, transportation, and other areas have certainly advanced the good life. 911 has shown that any technologies obtainable by terrorists will, without hesitation, apply them to mass destruction and mass killing.

Self defence is a basic right and extends to defense of our way of life and friends from any possible event that we know by experience terrorist will do when they obtain the means.

]]> By: Bill San Antonio TX http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/#comment-55003 Bill San Antonio TX Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:24:50 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=14557#comment-55003 Today should remind us that we want peace. It should also remind us that peace can only be achieved through strength because we are dealing with heartless terrorists who are not afraid to die in order to kill as many of us as possible. Today should remind us that we want peace.

It should also remind us that peace can only be achieved through strength because we are dealing with heartless terrorists who are not afraid to die in order to kill as many of us as possible.

]]> By: Bill San Antonio TX http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/third-site-missile-defenses-would-demonstrate-the-indivisibility-of-transatlantic-security/#comment-55000 Bill San Antonio TX Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:18:09 +0000 http://www.foundry.org/?p=14557#comment-55000 Good Article. You do not have to be a historian or stratagist to realize how much danger the world is in. Mass communications and transportation and technology make it more dangerous than any other time in history. Unfortunately, all too many people do not understand or think about the military ramifications... The most important priority is national defense. The liberals hate when you point this out; inside, they know this is true. It's as if we have to fight them in order to protect them and us! There should not even be a debate on our national security being paramount. Where is the common sense? Why is it we continually close our eyes to the reality of the world we live in? It is shameful how politicians always look at defense, first, for cuts, while hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted through inefficencies and fraud. Most of us do not have secret bunkers and hideaways that will accomodate our nation's leaders and their families in the event of a catastrophic attack. We understand and accept this. What we should not accept is backing away from a comprehensive missle shield. At least, we will have done everything possible to protect Americans. Some countries do not want us to builder a defensive missle shield. Why? Because it will be harder to successfully attack us. Hello!!! That is the general purpose for the program. May God Help Us Good Article.

You do not have to be a historian or stratagist to realize how much danger the world is in.

Mass communications and transportation and technology make it more dangerous than any other time in history. Unfortunately, all too many people do not understand or think about the military ramifications…

The most important priority is national defense. The liberals hate when you point this out; inside, they know this is true. It's as if we have to fight them in order to protect them and us!

There should not even be a debate on our national security being paramount. Where is the common sense?

Why is it we continually close our eyes to the reality of the world we live in?

It is shameful how politicians always look at defense, first, for cuts, while hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted through inefficencies and fraud.

Most of us do not have secret bunkers and hideaways that will accomodate our nation's leaders and their families in the event of a catastrophic attack. We understand and accept this.

What we should not accept is backing away from a comprehensive missle shield. At least, we will have done everything possible to protect Americans.

Some countries do not want us to builder a defensive missle shield.

Why? Because it will be harder to successfully attack us. Hello!!! That is the general purpose for the program.

May God Help Us

]]>