Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Obama, JFK and Hugo Chavez

Posted September 10th, 2009 at 12:00pm in American Leadership 1 Print This Post Print This Post

As President Obama reads press accounts of his speech on health care reform last night, he is likely to skip over an important editorial on foreign policy appearing in today’s Washington Post:

Mr. Chavez was in Tehran again this week and offered his full support for Mr. Ahmadinejad’s hard-line faction. As usual, the caudillo made clear that he shares Iran’s view of Israel, which he called “a genocidal state.” He endorsed Iran’s nuclear program and declared that Venezuela would seek Iran’s assistance to construct a nuclear complex of its own. He also announced that his government would begin supplying Iran with 20,000 barrels of gasoline a day — a deal that could directly undercut a possible U.S. effort to curtail Iran’s gasoline imports.

The Post references a troubling analysis presented by the Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau earlier this week. Mr. Morgenthau warned, “the self-described “axis of unity,” will be acting together in our backyard on the development of nuclear and missile technology. And it seems that terrorist groups have found the perfect operating ground for training and planning, and financing their activities through narco-trafficking.”

A sobering new study, highlighted in today’s Wall Street Journal, predicts an Iranian nuclear weapon by next year. Unless Iran ceases its nuclear defiance, a U.S.-Iranian showdown is likely. At such a time Chavez will be well-positioned to render support to Iran’s resistance and doomsday scenarios.

When asked to comment on Mr. Morgenthau’s concerns, the Post remarked, “the State Department, [also read White House], which is deeply invested in the Chavez-is-no-threat theory” promised to look into the situation. About Chavez, it concluded: “Not a threat? Give him time.”

This is not October 1962. The U-2’s are still in their hangars and alert levels are normal. But maybe it is June or July 1962.

JFK was tested 90 miles to the south by Fidel Castro and Nikita Khrushchev. A sobering challenge for the Obama Administration could very well come a little further south in the Caribbean thanks to Mr. Chavez and Mr. Ahmadinejad.

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “Obama, JFK and Hugo Chavez”

  1. Bill San Antonio TX on at said:

    In world affairs, like politics – perception is everything.

    Are we weak or strong? It does not matter what we think, it is what others think.

    It appears we will be tested on multiple fronts.

    The question is, “What will our response to these threats be as they unfold?”

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.